The room size is 8m length. But that’s not the point. The FR graph was measured 1m from the speaker. At the actual listening position the bass extended to a few Hz like other sealed subwoofers.Slightly surprised to see the bass roll off, has the room been created within a larger room?
Keith
Side walls are treated with thick absorbers/diffusers. It would be matter about bass response and stereo image width than comb filter.I feel too close to the side wall even in 5M from speaker. That kind of comb filtering.
If speakers are on rollers, you can move it bit by bit. Once I was setting up Avalon Acoustic Isis. We didn't have treated room. We naturally wouldn't place too much near the side wall. We have 20 plus tube traps to play around. Of course tube traps were not aesthetically appealing.Side walls are treated with thick absorbers/diffusers. It would be matter about bass response and stereo image width than comb filter.
But It also can be relocated a little.
The measurements are 1 meter away from the speakers and not actually at the listening position.Unfortunately that wide SBIR dip around 100 Hz will make the bass sound lifeless....
Nevertheless quite close to my currently preferred target:
View attachment 184777
Thank you for posting. But doesn´t seem very impressive for such a heavily treated room? Or am i wrong? I only know nearfield setups, but seeing this i wonder how LP measurements of big main monitors in a big studio look like.This is the listening position in room measurement. It's about 5M from the speaker.View attachment 184791
Far field measurement is hard to be clean FR as nearfield. Of course the bass range should be more clean, but the ceiling and side wall absorber is not very thick to absorbe axial room modes. The front and back wall are treated thick and bass resonant absorbers, So the overall RT60 is about 0.2~0.4s from the bass to treble.Thank you for posting. But doesn´t seem very impressive for such a heavily treated room? Or am i wrong? I only know nearfield setups, but seeing this i wonder how LP measurements of big main monitors in a big studio look like.
The graph has only a 1/24 octave smoothing, apply a 1/6 smoothing, which is the basis for most eq for example and some of the dips will vanish. 1/24 isn't really conclusive for how a speaker sounds to the ear.Thank you for posting. But doesn´t seem very impressive for such a heavily treated room? Or am i wrong? I only know nearfield setups, but seeing this i wonder how LP measurements of big main monitors in a big studio look like.
The graph has only a 1/24 octave smoothing, apply a 1/6 smoothing, which is the basis for most eq for example and some of the dips will vanish. 1/24 isn't really conclusive for how a speaker sounds to the ear.
The room isn't perfect, but the dips and peaks are fairly narrow and not huge in amplitude, this is a very fine sounding room. If you wish, you can eq the 600Hz region or bring down the whole curve a bit to even out the bass, but i would guess, that the difference would be marginal.
Good day to you all!Wow! Impressive room design and speakers!
Edit : Measurement data was excluded at the request of the concerned person.
Thanks, the SBIR dip problem doesn't really change though.The measurements are 1 meter away from the speakers and not actually at the listening position.
SBIRs are usually not that wide it’s probably a room mode or a mix of two.Thanks, the SBIR dip problem doesn't really change though.
Yes, usually a combination of SBIRs and modes.SBIRs are usually not that wide it’s probably a room mode or a mix of two.
They are active.They're not active? I think I'll pass