Reading the comments at the YouTube version of the Dan Clark Stealth review, I noticed that, as is typical on YouTube, there were some very lame comments and a fair amount of whining about the cost of these superb limited edition headphones. While reading the comments, I realized how much I appreciate the much higher level of discourse in many threads here at ASR.
I was going to post the below comment, but backed off and deleted it before hitting the reply button. Some clueless commenter who obviously operates from the common internet position of babbling before checking anything out, posted "Would be cool to see you measure and listen to some new R2R DACs" when the subject has been already been thrashed thoroughly here at ASR via reviews and heated discussions. When @VintageFlanker pointed this out, the defensive whining began, and I was going to reply with the below, but backed off and deleted the comment before posting. (The same commenter also stated " I love measurements as well , but no one with a serious system has a topping DAc. Get over yourself.")
-------------------
On a more productive note, my morning ASR session prompted me to think of a possible couple of topics for @Amir for future videos:
R2R vs Traditional Audio DACs - which technology works best?
and
Are superb performing DACS like Topping and SMSL - suitable for "serious" audio systems? (I would guess that the answer is yes - especially for those who recognize that speaker/amplifier matching and room treatment and/or DSP are the most important factors in making any system - entry-level or 'high-end" system - sound good. I can easily visualize a system with a Topping D90SE DAC, Benchmark or Mark Levinson amplifiers, and top-of-the line Revel loudspeakers that would be very "seriously" good. (Although I would probably go for an RME ADI-2 DAC.)
I was going to post the below comment, but backed off and deleted it before hitting the reply button. Some clueless commenter who obviously operates from the common internet position of babbling before checking anything out, posted "Would be cool to see you measure and listen to some new R2R DACs" when the subject has been already been thrashed thoroughly here at ASR via reviews and heated discussions. When @VintageFlanker pointed this out, the defensive whining began, and I was going to reply with the below, but backed off and deleted the comment before posting. (The same commenter also stated " I love measurements as well , but no one with a serious system has a topping DAc. Get over yourself.")
That was a painfully obvious defensive "lashing out" comment, likely from a young and inexperienced audio fan - the kind of comment that the younger generation might call "butthurt" motivated. Vintage Flanker is indeed a valued and experienced contributor at ASR - one among many intelligent amateur and professional participants who participate there, and someone whose opinions are usually worth reading. The "opinions" of those discussion participants (not just VintageFlanker) who demonstrate familiarity with and an understanding of evidence-backed "facts" are far more valuable than those of people whose opinions are based simply on emotion without any backing evidence.
-------------------
On a more productive note, my morning ASR session prompted me to think of a possible couple of topics for @Amir for future videos:
R2R vs Traditional Audio DACs - which technology works best?
and
Are superb performing DACS like Topping and SMSL - suitable for "serious" audio systems? (I would guess that the answer is yes - especially for those who recognize that speaker/amplifier matching and room treatment and/or DSP are the most important factors in making any system - entry-level or 'high-end" system - sound good. I can easily visualize a system with a Topping D90SE DAC, Benchmark or Mark Levinson amplifiers, and top-of-the line Revel loudspeakers that would be very "seriously" good. (Although I would probably go for an RME ADI-2 DAC.)