That’s the great thing about jokes, they don’t need to be factually accurate
This is correct and also irrelevant to both your original comment and my response. Factuality was never a consideration, only the relevance to Amir's post.
For the style of humor you seem to have been attempting, it is typical, well studied, and well tested that the most effective jokes of such nature take into proper account their inspirational material, otherwise you alienate your audience.
For example. Let's say I express news that some person in preparation for their second marriage has finally managed to save up the necessary funds to have the lavish wedding ceremony they wish they could have had in their first marriage.
If you made a joke about the money being a waste, because they don't know how to choose a spouse or some other comment of that nature, it may be rude, but it would be relevant because you are referencing information that has been given and is common knowledge to those reading your comment.
Now let's say you make a comment about how it's the parents paying for everything.
This could have potentially been funny or rude if relevant, but instead it's just noise. The reason being because you reference information that only lives in your own mind. Nobody can relate to the joke, because nowhere in the original news given was there evidence of any parental funding. In fact, the news seems to be quite the opposite.
So I hope this clarifies the issue and why I gave correction. Factual or not, your response to Amir's post was irrelevant to the information given.
There is the genre of sarcasm, which uses the device of saying something opposite to the actual intent, but that must be delivered with a certain level of skill and subtlety in order to be effectively communicated. If you were attempting sarcasm, I would suggest you do not have the skill for it.
But I do not believe sarcasm was the intent.
I think you just made a simple mistake of not reading the original post carefully enough to understand Amir's situation.