• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Let's stop calling Class D amplifiers "efficient" when they are not.

Well we can backcalculate from that:

1720341500581.png


I assumed it did not have PFC due to the big 50Hz transformer, but it has above 0.7 at some points and varies until 0.85 at full load so this has the behavior of passive PFC.

Also strangely enough I'm not seeing the class G-ness of this amp because efficiency at 1/8 and 1/3 is pretty ahem compared to full, where's the region of high efficiency that people keep pointing on the graphs.
Edit: Oh
1720342454544.png


Edit2: Ok I did the same for GX5 because I just had to see the G-ness
1720342659711.png
 
Last edited:
For comparison, Buckeye Amps stereo 350 W/ch (8 ohms) amp (Hypex NC502MP based) uses 0.5 W at idle and is specified as 92% efficient at full power.

0.5W is standby (soft off), not idle.
 
Well we can backcalculate from that:

View attachment 379509

I assumed it did not have PFC due to the big 50Hz transformer, but it has above 0.7 at some points and varies until 0.85 at full load so this has the behavior of passive PFC.

Also strangely enough I'm not seeing the class G-ness of this amp because efficiency at 1/8 and 1/3 is pretty ahem compared to full, where's the region of high efficiency that people keep pointing on the graphs.
Edit: Oh
View attachment 379514

Edit2: Ok I did the same for GX5 because I just had to see the G-ness
View attachment 379517
I missed QSC had PFC, not something I looked for. My original idea was a quick calculation, should have known better than try that here.

I earlier mentioned that QSC does not make it clear class of operation; you have to dig into various documents for each amplifier series, and not all amps in the series have the same class. Lower-power amps are often AB, higher-power H or D.

0.5W is standby (soft off), not idle.
Figures.

I think I've screwed up enough for one thread, out.
 
I don’t much care about efficiency as a percentage at low power outputs. If I’m putting a watt into the speakers, I don’t care idf the amp is consuming 10 watts or 1.1. And efficiency will always be zero at idle.

I do note idle power consumption. B&K claimed my amp idles at 60 watts. That’s a significant amount of heat for no output—enough to need significant heatsinks. But not heatsinks larger than at rated power.

The efficiency of Class D matters for heatsink and cooling design, it seems to me, which isn’t much of a thing at idle. Cooling sufficient for rated power will be abundant for idling, it seems to me. My Buckeye, if it is indeed producing 300 wpc, is creating about 50 watts of heat from the devices (plus power supply). It’s creating less than that at idle.

Percentages are statistics that can be really misleading.

Rick “just tell me how many watts are being radiated as heat” Denney
 
I don’t much care about efficiency as a percentage at low power outputs. If I’m putting a watt into the speakers, I don’t care idf the amp is consuming 10 watts or 1.1. And efficiency will always be zero at idle.

I do note idle power consumption. B&K claimed my amp idles at 60 watts. That’s a significant amount of heat for no output—enough to need significant heatsinks. But not heatsinks larger than at rated power.

The efficiency of Class D matters for heatsink and cooling design, it seems to me, which isn’t much of a thing at idle. Cooling sufficient for rated power will be abundant for idling, it seems to me. My Buckeye, if it is indeed producing 300 wpc, is creating about 50 watts of heat from the devices (plus power supply). It’s creating less than that at idle.

Percentages are statistics that can be really misleading.

Rick “just tell me how many watts are being radiated as heat” Denney
I keep requesting mains wattage draw c/w current metering too so we can see what is occurring with this gear. I had it at one electronics lab I owned and it was so nice to operate when it is all prewired with meters and one just plugs in and also have a variac to it if required but for @amirm's purposes a variac is not required.
 
I keep requesting mains wattage draw c/w current metering too so we can see what is occurring with this gear. I had it at one electronics lab I owned and it was so nice to operate when it is all prewired with meters and one just plugs in and also have a variac to it if required but for @amirm's purposes a variac is not required.
Wattmeters are $10 on Amazon.
 
There is a little more to it than a Watt meter. It needs voltage metering and current or watts. I prefer current and then we can make our own Watts calc.
The ready made ones are recording. It would be useful to know the energy consumption over a week or month of actual use.
 
The ready made ones are recording. It would be useful to know the energy consumption over a week or month of actual use.
The week or month is a difficult metering because the unit needs to be operated and used for that period otherwise it sits there quiescent. To get Amirm to meter the voltage and current will be a hurdle... LoL.
 
The week or month is a difficult metering because the unit needs to be operated and used for that period otherwise it sits there quiescent. To get Amirm to meter the voltage and current will be a hurdle... LoL.
But that’s the point. Annual energy consumption.
 
But that’s the point. Annual energy consumption.
Well... If we can get a quiescent metering and a fully loaded metering we can determine a lot about the gear. Then we can compare them to each other and see what is what. Class D to class A/AB would be a interesting comparison.
 
There is a little more to it than a Watt meter. It needs voltage metering and current or watts. I prefer current and then we can make our own Watts calc.
Not unless you know the current/voltage waveform and phase relationship you can't.
 
Back
Top Bottom