Pareto Pragmatic
Addicted to Fun and Learning
I don't care much about AV, other than I like 5.1 for zoom crash boom. Still, I've been thinking about replacing my ancient AV speakers, and while I would have rather NOT gone Klipsch, the numbers are the numbers and the room is the room. Cost is also numbers, which was $750 usd for the RP 5000f ii. This was for a 33'x13'x8.5' room, connected in the back through 4 doors into 2x the volume in other parts of the house... with windows open at the back. Speakers one foot off the wall behind them.
After setting them up today for my low level 5.1 system (Denon 540 bt), I shot a sweep through my reference system of just the speakers, no sub. Quick report, even in my room with insane levels of gain from my 100 year old floor bouncing like a huge passive radiator, they do drop at 50hz, just at measured by Erin. They are bright, and so the speaker tilt up/distance needs to be correct to keep me under the tweeter. Still bright, just not as bright that way. Shoulder toe to the listening position (speakers are asymmetrical to the room and the couch/mic, for reasons).
Given my room, they did just what I thought they would. Here's a 1/12 sweep and a 1/3 REW EQ Wizard solution with 10 PEQs (starting at 50 since these speakers cross over pretty well with my floor at 30). I have not tested/tuned the EQ yet, just simulated. There is a -2db hs for the brightness at 3kHz.
The drop as it approaches 20k, that's my floor, not the speaker, 100%.
They sound good, better than I thought they would. I am once again reminded of why people like Klipsch.
They are no competition for my Sierra LX set 5' into the room, nor should they be, but good. They do the trick quite well for AV, and for background/working music I like them . My wife appreciates the vocal clarity upgrade from what went before.
I have a feeling that even with EQ, they won't play as loud as comfortably as the LXs in stereo. Loud meaning 80db/12' or 90db/1m levels, loud for me. But they won't have to play in stereo, they have a sub.
So if you are thinking about any of these, trust the roll off frequency for extension, but consider your room gain for levels. I did, and it worked out well for me.
After setting them up today for my low level 5.1 system (Denon 540 bt), I shot a sweep through my reference system of just the speakers, no sub. Quick report, even in my room with insane levels of gain from my 100 year old floor bouncing like a huge passive radiator, they do drop at 50hz, just at measured by Erin. They are bright, and so the speaker tilt up/distance needs to be correct to keep me under the tweeter. Still bright, just not as bright that way. Shoulder toe to the listening position (speakers are asymmetrical to the room and the couch/mic, for reasons).
Given my room, they did just what I thought they would. Here's a 1/12 sweep and a 1/3 REW EQ Wizard solution with 10 PEQs (starting at 50 since these speakers cross over pretty well with my floor at 30). I have not tested/tuned the EQ yet, just simulated. There is a -2db hs for the brightness at 3kHz.
The drop as it approaches 20k, that's my floor, not the speaker, 100%.
They sound good, better than I thought they would. I am once again reminded of why people like Klipsch.
They are no competition for my Sierra LX set 5' into the room, nor should they be, but good. They do the trick quite well for AV, and for background/working music I like them . My wife appreciates the vocal clarity upgrade from what went before.
I have a feeling that even with EQ, they won't play as loud as comfortably as the LXs in stereo. Loud meaning 80db/12' or 90db/1m levels, loud for me. But they won't have to play in stereo, they have a sub.
So if you are thinking about any of these, trust the roll off frequency for extension, but consider your room gain for levels. I did, and it worked out well for me.