mhardy6647
Grand Contributor
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2019
- Messages
- 11,368
- Likes
- 24,573
Ok, I ordered one. What the heck I am going to do with these speakers...I have no idea....
@amirmWell Q Acoustics have a 30 day risk-free trial on their speakers, so you could just return them for a refund right after measuring
As a policy, I don't do that. I get use out of them by measuring and it would not be right to then return them for free.Well Q Acoustics have a 30 day risk-free trial on their speakers, so you could just return them for a refund right after measuring
As a policy, I don't do that. I get use out of them by measuring and it would not be right to then return them for free.
Members can do that that though if measurements don't match the company advertising.
As a policy, I don't do that. I get use out of them by measuring and it would not be right to then return them for free.
Members can do that that though if measurements don't match the company advertising.
Exactly. I have seen so many forum posts like "I ordered 3 camcorders to test, and I will keep one and send back the others..." It makes me wonder what happened to the common morality. Returned items cannot be re-sold as new, or for the new price. It is stealing just as sure as swiping something at the 7-11
Good thing the moral bastions of Amazon, Walmart, Best Buy, Apple et. al have folks like you looking out for non-fraudulent return bandits so they can continue to dodge hundreds of billions in taxes, pay their employees a homeless wage, charge you triple/quadruple digit mark up, and enact schemes/policies designed to screws you over and bleed you dry. Nope, the immoral party here is Joe Plumber, to whom $500 is probably a significant amount of money, buying 2 camcorders with the intent of returning 1.
Exactly. I have seen so many forum posts like "I ordered 3 camcorders to test, and I will keep one and send back the others..." It makes me wonder what happened to the common morality. Returned items cannot be re-sold as new, or for the new price. It is stealing just as sure as swiping something at the 7-11
> If I swindle the swindler, I'm not a swindler myself!Good thing the moral bastions of Amazon, Walmart, Best Buy, Apple et. al have folks like you looking out for non-fraudulent return bandits so they can continue to dodge hundreds of billions in taxes, pay their employees a homeless wage, charge you triple/quadruple digit mark up, and enact schemes/policies designed to screws you over and bleed you dry. Nope, the immoral party here is Joe Plumber, to whom $500 is probably a significant amount of money, buying 2 camcorders with the intent of returning 1.
If a no obligation return policy is stated then it can be used. However your post infers that 'two wrongs make it right'. That is morally wrong. View attachment 51234
> If I swindle the swindler, I'm not a swindler myself!
That's not how logic works. Even if it might be rightful/lawful swindling; just don't go and try to twist words as a a shortcut, you damage your position.
If a no obligation return policy is stated then it can be used. However your post infers that 'two wrongs make it right'. That is morally wrong. View attachment 51234
As you said, if it's in their policy, it's lawful. And it could be rightful if your intention is, same way that killing a killer isn't necessarily bad, unless you live in Plato's Republic's ridiculous justice.Rightful/lawful swindling? Pull the other leg. View attachment 51235
As you said, if it's in their policy, it's lawful. And it could be rightful if your intention is, same way that killing a killer isn't necessarily bad, unless you live in Plato's Republic's ridiculous justice.
Well, if you want to say that "rightful" has no meaning or reality, revel in your moral relativism all you want, I guess.Lynch mob mentality was 'rightful'. Ugh.
Well, if you want to say that "rightful" has no meaning or reality, revel in your moral relativism all you want, I guess.