Everybody understood like solderdude, and in that I mean, ambiguously.
Under several comments arguing most audio cables sound the same, which was the point of the discussion, you said '"ironically most of them do make a difference".
You beginned with an argument of authority (20 years experience, thousands of cables), that we can qualify as such because the next sentence gets -intentionally- very vague "Just not for the better and not for the reasons anyone thinks", and then provide zero explanation on the -crucial- context.
Which is a (subtle?) way of moving the debate from "do hifi cables sound different?" to "do electric cables have different properties?". Some perfectly able and fine fellas might logically think it is probably the area of expertise you mentioned at first?
My picture
Thank you for your attention.
I have no idea what to tell you. You seem to understand just fine. You understood the context and then proceed to tell me I gave you no context. Let me try again.
I don't agree with everyone else.
High end cables can often make audio sound worse.
When the audio sounds worse, in my experience the culprit is generally the result of the cable - intentionally or unintentionally - being created as a filter.
If I am still losing you, IDK how to help.