Either that or just a loose, intermittent connection.When I’ve noticed differences in RCA cables, the first thing I’ve done is disconnect and clean them. Connector rectification is something that I’ve noticed, and that can make a difference.
Either that or just a loose, intermittent connection.When I’ve noticed differences in RCA cables, the first thing I’ve done is disconnect and clean them. Connector rectification is something that I’ve noticed, and that can make a difference.
Offering that much might raise suspicions. I'd offer $5I’m always fascinated by the reaction to one of Amir’s piggybank reviews. They seem to trigger a large number of responses from those amongst us that are exasperated/ astonished/ annoyed by the stupidity rich and their spending habits. At $4500 the Kimber RCA cables are certainly overpriced, but if I came across these or something similar at an estate sale I wouldn’t hesitate to offer something ridiculous, like $45, just to see if the seller knows what they are.
LMAO !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Offering that much might raise suspicions. I'd offer $5
Sure. Due to very high impedances of the load, there can be interactions there that don't exist in normal cables.Maybe you can test detachable estat headphone cables if someone sends you some
I don't have the audio sample part but can easily create one with very long cables. For now, here is a study I did on advertised "12 gauage" wires: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/when-12-gauge-wire-is-not-12-gauge.3/I would love to see a video showing this measurable effect of resistance in either speaker or audio interconnects, and capacitance in same wires, and if audible then audio samples as well.
The only reason I might offer $5 is to recycle the crap on eBay. I'm quite sure some fool could be convinced to part with 1/10th its original price and I'd have no qualms at pocketing the profit. In an eBay auction environment or at something like an estate sale, making an offer of sale without ANY of the misleading claims, I'll take what I can get.Offering that much might raise suspicions. I'd offer $5
lol you're very much not liked by some of these zealots on one of the forums rife with this BS.That which is unmeasurable, as they like to say.
I won't say who it was, but an audio manufacturer recently approached my objective stance on measurements by asking if I was religious and then insinuating faith/the belief you hear a difference means a difference exists.
You will NEVER convince everyone with objective data. Just won't happen.
If they can't be measured, likely they are not objectively real. Do a double blind test yourself with a silver cable and a copper cable. If you do not know which cable you are listening to, they will sound the same. Any differences that people think they hear in cables like these are due to placebo effect - it's all in their minds.why didn't you do a listening test? something can't be measured. Silver should sound clean, that's what I want to hear!
/s
Some one missed the /s signIf they can't be measured, likely they are not objectively real. Do a double blind test yourself with a silver cable and a copper cable. If you do not know which cable you are listening to, they will sound the same. Any differences that people think they hear in cables like these are due to placebo effect - it's all in their minds.
You expect silver to sound clear - so when you listen to a what you know is a silver cable, your mind will fool into thinking there's a difference in sound. This is the difference between subjective and objective - the reason it's called psychoacoustics and not just acoustics. These differences vanish in double blind testing, as has been shown repeatedly. Read Floyd Toole's work.
Yea, it is super surprising how many people take issue with me being upfront and direct, even when it means I am NOT upselling them or I am actively trying to save them money with the truth.lol you're very much not liked by some of these zealots on one of the forums rife with this BS.
I'd paraphrase what one said in response to a post asking about 1ET9040BA and Hypex Amps and their "musicality"
here's the comment - "The reason Buckeye doesn't talk about his amplifier sound is because, and I quote this is coming from him all his amplifiers are "true to source". A straight wire with amplification. What about other amplifiers like the AHB2? Well they are also 'true to source' and thus sound completely identical.
That is his claim, whether they sound identical or true-to-source or not, I cannot report.
Personally I find him very lacking in knowledge. Saying things like 'all op-amps sound identical when implemented properly' and 'measurements tell the absolute truth'. "
you must have hurt their feelings not indulging in their expectations of amp makers making shit up for marketing lol
In extreme cases only. Just how dirty were they is really the question I was asking.
Honesty can be a rare thing these days, hence people have trouble recognizing it sometimes.Yea, it is super surprising how many people take issue with me being upfront and direct, even when it means I am NOT upselling them or I am actively trying to save them money with the truth.
Especially in the current political contextHonesty can be a rare thing these days, hence people have trouble recognizing it sometimes.