I want to add a comment to this, since I had the L-08M’s which I have shown really nice measurements of here.
I know everyone insists that all amps sound alike if they aren’t broken, and I also agree that all amps sound nearly indistinguishable and that any real or perceived improvement is a fraction of what you would get applying that same budget to the speakers.
But I spent over 3000€ importing a set of multi voltage L-08m and then another $1000 having it restored by QuirkAudio, who also has a track record of great measuring upgrades here.
I finally get the set up back and sit down and _______
I don’t like the sound.
Sighted bias should have really made me feel like this was the world’s greatest amp. If anything, I should have said no difference but I know it measures really well and beyond the threshold of hearing.
But no. I don’t like the sound.
Despair? Depression? I actually start going through track after track and it pales in comparison to the Marantz PM-90, also tested here.
I start doing A/B comparisons with plenty of delay and sighted bias. I try to think what I do or do not like about it.
The difference is in the width of the phantom center. Using something like the La La Land Soundtrack, the vocals are very different in perceived width. With the Kenwood, it’s so narrow and with the Marantz it’s wider. With the Kenwood, I can pinpoint the mouth of the singer in my virtual space. With the Marantz, the center seems larger than life and I cannot really point with on finger exactly where the phantom center is but I can point to the region.
Is this cross talk? Some sort of harmonics adding perceived bloom? Subtle difference in FR from the speaker load?
No idea. It was just very interesting that sighted bias, newness bias and wallet bias should have made me love what I just bought and I actually didn’t.