Probably not. EI transformer, proximity to circuit, PSR of the circuit, ancient PCB design. However EI is good to reduce HF from mains.Wonder if not some of the 60Hz would go away if the owner refurbed the power supply ?
Probably not. EI transformer, proximity to circuit, PSR of the circuit, ancient PCB design. However EI is good to reduce HF from mains.Wonder if not some of the 60Hz would go away if the owner refurbed the power supply ?
Thanks we learned some things in 40 years transformer with less stray field and not so close to circuit.Probably not. EI transformer, proximity to circuit, PSR of the circuit, ancient PCB design. However EI is good to reduce HF from mains.
And what?? It is inaudible.SINAD below 90, even close to 80.
It’s the performance. I can say the SINAD same as Torque in car because torque will win the race. The wattage is same as Horsepower but SINAD is the TorqueAnd what?? It is inaudible.
Probably not. EI transformer, proximity to circuit, PSR of the circuit, ancient PCB design. However EI is good to reduce HF from mains.
PMA already answeredI wonder if changing those filtering caps would mitigate some of the mains leakage.
Good old Japanese hifi from an era where large and serious companies with a lot of R&D were involved in stereo Hifi, unfortunately after the mid 80s things changed a lot to come to the "high end" snake oil mess of today.Yeah, that’s it. 40+ years old amplifiers that has no problems with complex load impedance and has very good parameters that may be audible. The designers new what they were doing.
Also nice to see decay of harmonics in the spectrum. Not the now usual crossover distortion dominated.
Really shows the leap in performance over the past decades. Nothing really wrong with this amplifier, but modern amplifiers in the price range run circles around it.Back then the thing would have cost about $1800 in today's money.
(which god do I have to pray too to save me from analogies?)It’s the performance. I can say the SINAD same as Torque in car because torque will win the race. The wattage is same as Horsepower but SINAD is the Torque
They may do in terms of specs, but so what? These new amps won't sound any better.Really shows the leap in performance over the past decades. Nothing really wrong with this amplifier, but modern amplifiers in the price range run circles around it.
It will be a great pleasure to read about the improved performance after the visit to town!The L-05m/L-07m are a generation before the L-06m/L/08m.
The L-08M measures far better, but to be fair, my L-08M was given to Peter at QuirkAudio and told to go to town with upgrading the power supply and all of the capacitors, etc.
I recently picked up a Topping D90, so I can retest the L-08M.
Kenwood L-08M Monoblock Amplifier (Vintage Review)
Kenwood L-08M Monoblock Amplifier Review (Vintage Gear; QuirkAudio restored) Where were you in 1980? In Tokyo, Japan, a small team of engineers released the most sophisticated amplifier of its time... A bit of history In the 1970's, an elite team of veteran Trio-Kenwood engineers left the...www.audiosciencereview.com
But That's just generalities, the ML-11 is just a 50 wpc amp. This here have significantly more power and likely measure better than your Mark Levinson. That's what this serie of Kenwood monoblocks was about. No nonsense Japanese Engineering with objective performance as a focus. Power is not about listening Volume, it's about headroom and dynamics.Modern amps do sound better to me. While it is impossible to scientifically validate my statement, an old ML-11 (with new caps) I cherished does not offer the same emotionally engaging envelope offered by newer Hypex monoblocks, at a similar listening volume. It is a great review of a classic Kenwood, however, no nostalgia for the 1980’s!
Thank you Amir!
Well, kind of. People expect nice things to be dirt cheap now. And indeed, you can get a lot of bang for the buck. But I bet this amp was not considered inexpensive in its day.So, this machine is from the early 80s of the last century (no later than 1981).
There are 42 years old capacitors inside and so on.
And after 42 years, the amplifier shows the parameters declared by the manufacturer.
This is what we are losing in the flood of cheap Chinese nonsense.
You don't know yet... unless you have a Time Machine. (underlining is mine)So, this machine is from the early 80s of the last century (no later than 1981).
There are 42 years old capacitors inside and so on.
And after 42 years, the amplifier shows the parameters declared by the manufacturer.
This is what we are losing in the flood of cheap Chinese nonsense.