• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Kenwood L-05M Vintage Amplifier Review

Rate this amplifier:

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 6 3.0%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 27 13.6%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther)

    Votes: 123 61.8%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 43 21.6%

  • Total voters
    199

Mnyb

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Aug 14, 2019
Messages
2,645
Likes
3,624
Location
Sweden, Västerås
Probably not. EI transformer, proximity to circuit, PSR of the circuit, ancient PCB design. However EI is good to reduce HF from mains.
Thanks :) we learned some things in 40 years transformer with less stray field and not so close to circuit.

But at the time this was built it was far far better than any source component vinyl or tape or radio :) so mission accomplished.
 

JktHifi

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2023
Messages
387
Likes
195
And what?? It is inaudible.
It’s the performance. I can say the SINAD same as Torque in car because torque will win the race. The wattage is same as Horsepower but SINAD is the Torque
 
Last edited:

pavuol

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Oct 2, 2019
Messages
1,562
Likes
3,951
Location
EU next to warzone :.(
considering Kenwood's current offer, good example of region dependant "brand":
US: no home audio, just "car entertainment stuff"
EU/DE: quite a selection of "modern" microsystems (color displays, DAB, streaming...), this product category was abandoned by most manufacturers already
example M-9000S-B
M-9000S-B_Front_Icons.png

JP: site still lists some "old schood" quality looking microsystems, eg:
K-515
image_product01_big.jpg
 

thewas

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 15, 2020
Messages
6,755
Likes
16,214
Yeah, that’s it. 40+ years old amplifiers that has no problems with complex load impedance and has very good parameters that may be audible. The designers new what they were doing.
Also nice to see decay of harmonics in the spectrum. Not the now usual crossover distortion dominated.
Good old Japanese hifi from an era where large and serious companies with a lot of R&D were involved in stereo Hifi, unfortunately after the mid 80s things changed a lot to come to the "high end" snake oil mess of today.
 

Koeitje

Major Contributor
Joined
Oct 10, 2019
Messages
2,292
Likes
3,880
Back then the thing would have cost about $1800 in today's money.
Really shows the leap in performance over the past decades. Nothing really wrong with this amplifier, but modern amplifiers in the price range run circles around it.
 

Sokel

Master Contributor
Joined
Sep 8, 2021
Messages
5,844
Likes
5,787
It’s the performance. I can say the SINAD same as Torque in car because torque will win the race. The wattage is same as Horsepower but SINAD is the Torque
(which god do I have to pray too to save me from analogies?)

To the subject,I wish 40 years from now I will still have one of my now electronics and perform the same.
Pure respect.

Thanks Amir!
 

sergeauckland

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Mar 16, 2016
Messages
3,440
Likes
9,100
Location
Suffolk UK
Really shows the leap in performance over the past decades. Nothing really wrong with this amplifier, but modern amplifiers in the price range run circles around it.
They may do in terms of specs, but so what? These new amps won't sound any better.
This Kenwood amp illustrates what I've been saying for a while, that amps haven't improved audibly since the late 1970s, and within power and load limitations, since the late 1960s.
Modern amps only have the specs they do because it's now hard not to.

S.
 

AndreaT

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Jul 19, 2020
Messages
613
Likes
1,182
Location
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Modern amps do sound better to me. While it is impossible to scientifically validate my statement, an old ML-11 (with new caps) I cherished does not offer the same emotionally engaging envelope offered by newer Hypex monoblocks, at a similar listening volume. It is a great review of a classic Kenwood, however, no nostalgia for the 1980’s!

Thank you Amir!
 

AndreaT

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Jul 19, 2020
Messages
613
Likes
1,182
Location
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
The L-05m/L-07m are a generation before the L-06m/L/08m.

The L-08M measures far better, but to be fair, my L-08M was given to Peter at QuirkAudio and told to go to town with upgrading the power supply and all of the capacitors, etc.

I recently picked up a Topping D90, so I can retest the L-08M.
It will be a great pleasure to read about the improved performance after the visit to town!
 

PeteL

Major Contributor
Joined
Jun 1, 2020
Messages
3,303
Likes
3,838
Modern amps do sound better to me. While it is impossible to scientifically validate my statement, an old ML-11 (with new caps) I cherished does not offer the same emotionally engaging envelope offered by newer Hypex monoblocks, at a similar listening volume. It is a great review of a classic Kenwood, however, no nostalgia for the 1980’s!

Thank you Amir!
But That's just generalities, the ML-11 is just a 50 wpc amp. This here have significantly more power and likely measure better than your Mark Levinson. That's what this serie of Kenwood monoblocks was about. No nonsense Japanese Engineering with objective performance as a focus. Power is not about listening Volume, it's about headroom and dynamics.
 

notsodeadlizard

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2023
Messages
403
Likes
362
So, this machine is from the early 80s of the last century (no later than 1981).
There are 42 years old capacitors inside and so on.
And after 42 years, the amplifier shows the parameters declared by the manufacturer.
This is what we are losing in the flood of cheap Chinese nonsense.
 

fpitas

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jul 7, 2022
Messages
9,885
Likes
14,191
Location
Northern Virginia, USA
So, this machine is from the early 80s of the last century (no later than 1981).
There are 42 years old capacitors inside and so on.
And after 42 years, the amplifier shows the parameters declared by the manufacturer.
This is what we are losing in the flood of cheap Chinese nonsense.
Well, kind of. People expect nice things to be dirt cheap now. And indeed, you can get a lot of bang for the buck. But I bet this amp was not considered inexpensive in its day.
 

FrantzM

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Mar 12, 2016
Messages
4,337
Likes
7,737
So, this machine is from the early 80s of the last century (no later than 1981).
There are 42 years old capacitors inside and so on.
And after 42 years, the amplifier shows the parameters declared by the manufacturer.
This is what we are losing in the flood of cheap Chinese nonsense.
You don't know yet... unless you have a Time Machine. (underlining is mine)

Peace.
 
Top Bottom