• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

KEF R3 Meta - Review & Measurements by Erin

The old R300 were pretty good already, then R3 were still better and now of course R3 Meta better yet. They are going to sell a lot.
Maybe not too many regular people are on ASR we probably represent less than 1% of the population who looks at data rather than subjective opinions!
 
Wow! Erin has been busy lately. Good to see him back in action.
 
Maybe not too many regular people are on ASR we probably represent less than 1% of the population who looks at data rather than subjective opinions!
By traffic, ASR is the 5th or 6th most visited Hi-Fi forum worldwide, FYI. I think it even went to 4th position back in 2022 (same traffic as HeadFi, but behind AVS). ;)
 
By traffic, ASR is the 5th or 6th most visited Hi-Fi forum worldwide, FYI. I think it even went to 4th position back in 2022 (same traffic as HeadFi, but behind AVS). ;)
Encouraging but 99% of people out there still believes expensive cables improves sound quality and signature. Snake oil audio is still here to stay. Probably need another 10 years to see a difference in local hifi industry
 
By traffic, ASR is the 5th or 6th most visited Hi-Fi forum worldwide, FYI. I think it even went to 4th position back in 2022 (same traffic as HeadFi, but behind AVS). ;)
We're not only in the golden age of audio equipment, we're also in the golden age of audio reviewing. Perhaps the latter has something to do with the former.
 
I think distortion measurement w/ 80hz crossover was cool because (and somebody's gonna ultra disagree with me) such speakers shouldn't be used without a sub.

edit:
Same for info on 10 degrees off axis. I want measurements correlated to how I'd actually use the speaker.
 
Last edited:
To clarify, Erin doesn't have skin in the game. His reviews can not be swayed in any direction other than the objective truth. It is possible, down the road, that conflict of interest could arise. This is why I wrote all his reviews are positive. I wasn't talking about what he says in his videos, as I don't watch them. To my second point, I don't believe Erin or Amir have ever given poor design/measurements favourable reviews. They are not Zeos. To me, that is the best kind of review. They are all positive because they rely on objective data/measurements. I can look at a few charts and make conclusions myself. Now as far as speakers being good with poor measurements, I have yet to come across that on ASR or Erins Audio.

I don't really care if someone says this is a bad speaker in a "video," as I know both reviewers are going to say that already, given the measurements.

Edit: I re-read my initial comment. I wasn't saying the KEF R3'S were bad. I meant to say the reviews are all positive. The speakers, in broad terms, could be good or bad based on the objective data provided. Thats a win/positive for me.
See this review?

 
  • Like
Reactions: GDK
In the thread with the Kef representative answering questions on the white paper they said there was no change to driver or waveguide geometry that would change dispersion, so it would be the same.
but they changed the crossover point.. that was the '' wider '' dispersion?
if im not wrong the ref1meta has a bit wider directivity, now it's 50° instead of 40° or im lost?
 
With my front 3 being Kef Reference, I had R3 as side surrounds (80Hz crossover). For the longest time I wanted to upgrade my side surrounds to used non-Meta Reference 1s. I ended up with the R3 Meta instead, and I couldn’t be happier.
 
Should they sound identical then?
No, both their on- and off-axis responses are different as it can be seen in the same plot (plus the distortions which cannot be seen in a spinorama).
 
Also the second part of his claim

is similarly wrong.

See this review?

I have not. That is rather unfortunate. I haven't read the review but curious about the panther.
 
Back
Top Bottom