What I meant was also sarcasm, we all know muon should be faster than a 10 dollar speaker.
What I meant was also sarcasm, we all know muon should be faster than a 10 dollar speaker.
If you put it on a Lamborghini and the Bluetooth speaker on a Ford Mondeo, then yes.What I meant was also sarcasm, we all know muon should be faster than a 10 dollar speaker.
Maybe take independently weigh both the old version and the new one, that is, find out the real weight difference.The tweeter has been redesigned in particular the "flanges" or external lines I don't know exactly what they are called, also the magnet block is different (first open now closed) with the addition of the Metamaterial... all things however that do not justify the decrease weight???
I read these things on the Kef website, there are also videos about it.
I honestly don't understand this difference in weight, from the specifications the Meta speaker box is also a few millimeters larger.
The woofer seems to be the same as the old series, that can't make any difference......perhaps the crossover?
I don't understand, I'm tempted to take the latest examples of the R series then I tell myself the new series is better!!! (maybe more out of curiosity).
Another option is to take the old model and keep it for one year to see how the new "Meta" goes
Maybe it's a "flop" and it turns out that the older model is better?
Confused, a greeting.
If I play a 100hz signal for 1second on muon and a 10 dollar speaker, both should go forth and back 100 times and stop perfectly at the end of 1 second right ?If you put it on a Lamborghini and the Bluetooth speaker on a Ford Mondeo, then yes.
I think when people mention “speed” what they really refer to is either group delay, transient response or dynamic range.If I play a 100hz signal for 1second on muon and a 10 dollar speaker, both should go forth and back 100 times and stop perfectly at the end of 1 second right ?
Exactly, these are often speakers with extremely light tiny woofers and fairly large magnets. Virtually no semi-decent Bluetooth speaker will have trouble following abrupt frequency changes faithfully. Then it doesn't have the physical ability to generate movement of air at certain frequencies, but that's a different story.If I play a 100hz signal for 1second on muon and a 10 dollar speaker, both should go forth and back 100 times and stop perfectly at the end of 1 second right ?
One can only assume the difference in weight is a thinner cabinet or one with less bracing, possibly because resonances are less of an issue with the meta material. Interestingly it seems the entire line-up has higher sensitivity than the prior gen. That's probably going to be biggest audible upgradeThe tweeter has been redesigned in particular the "flanges" or external lines I don't know exactly what they are called, also the magnet block is different (first open now closed) with the addition of the Metamaterial... all things however that do not justify the decrease weight???
I read these things on the Kef website, there are also videos about it.
I honestly don't understand this difference in weight, from the specifications the Meta speaker box is also a few millimeters larger.
The woofer seems to be the same as the old series, that can't make any difference......perhaps the crossover?
I don't understand, I'm tempted to take the latest examples of the R series then I tell myself the new series is better!!! (maybe more out of curiosity).
Another option is to take the old model and keep it for one year to see how the new "Meta" goes
Maybe it's a "flop" and it turns out that the older model is better?
Confused, a greeting.
You can not judge a speaker by a YouTube video. We went over this here recently ad infinum. You can look it up and read all the facts about.Even the second track I find warmer and more detailed than the old model.
While the third the Meta series is less annoying on the Rock piece (probably the Metamaterial absorbs distortions and reverberations).
I think for my musical genre (I don't listen to Rock and Metal) the old series is more suitable.
Of course we can't rely on remote recording, don't refer to what I'm saying, it would be interesting to understand what the guy who made the video says.
See you soon.
You can not judge a speaker by a YouTube video. We went over this here recently ad infinum. You can look it up and read all the facts about.
Gave it to my Slovak partner. Piss poor review. The only sentence of substance he said that bass was more precise and it wasn’t throwing bass at him like old R7 which was something he didn’t like before. Then he talks about using different microphone for this comparison and hoping we will hear the difference even though it’s uploaded to YouTube blah blah blah.Anyone speak Czech here?