Some speakers are just poor designs that only exist because of historical precedent.
Keith
Keith
But then that is a 3-way speaker! No 1000Hz leaking out from port.Almost all serious ATCs (≥SCM50) have ports.
KEF do pretty well in blind testing from what I've seen. This article compares about a dozen budget bookshelf speakers and the Q150 was the overall winner and the Upgrade pick. They mention how they evaluated but it was blind with a switcher capable of instantly switching between 3 pair of speakers at a time.
https://thewirecutter.com/reviews/best-bookshelf-speakers/
Q350 is really good, I used to own a pair. Come on amirm, you did enjoy the bloated midbass of the M16, why did you mistreat the Q350?
Doesn't seem to help much the poorly designed 700 series...Check the filter of a B&w 700 speaker the difference is huge. B&W use munforf cap.
Their older models measure better, so the only explanation is that that is the intended house curve they are after.Doesn't seem to help much the poor designed 700 series...
They should rather work on their crossover...
View attachment 64616
(704 S2)
Their older models measure better, so the only explanation is that that is the intended house curve they are after.
Doesn't seem to help much the poor designed 700 series...
They should rather work on their crossover...
View attachment 64616
(704 S2)
Although this series of B&W speakers leaves a lot to be desired, in this case I think the dip seen in the measurements is mostly attributable to the measurement having been taken on the wrong axis, and the crossover being at a very high frequency relative to the C2C distance between the drivers.
The 702 S2 was measured by Stereophile, who essentially found the midrange axis to be the design axis, not the tweeter axis:
EDIT: I take that back partially.
Obviously, neither axis is ideal, with a dip in the upper midrange swapping places with a dip in the mid-treble. Perhaps the optimum axis was somewhere in between (or perhaps the speaker is just a mess, lol).
Agreed. None of both curves look good to me!EDIT: I take that back partially.
Obviously, neither axis is idea
But it gets smoothed out off-axis:Which revealed even deeper 5kHz dip.
But it gets smoothed out off-axis:
Still not an ideal design.
Probably. But that doesn't excuse this terrible FR, even if it has been designed that way on purpose.I think the b&w curve is a deliberate choice and not a failure .
Probably. But that doesn't excuse this terrible FR, even if it has been designed that way on purpose.
Probably. But that doesn't excuse this terrible FR, even if it has been designed that way on purpose.
Instead of inexcusable I would say it’s its even a bigger crime if done purposely.
I'm wondering what could be the purpose?
I'm wondering what could be the purpose?