• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

KEF Blade Two Meta Review

Point source vs wide dispersion.
I haven't heard a live concert yet that was Point Source based. :D

Why on earth would anyone want a concert sound at home. I work in live sound and compared to a well executed home audio system, live sound kind of sounds terrible. Most acoustic instruments by themselves don't sound great. Do people actually want the sound of an un-mic'd unprocessed drum kit in their home? Home audio reproduction has always been about creating an engaging illusion. The entire art of mixing is there to create and aid the illusion.
 
Why on earth would anyone want a concert sound at home. I work in live sound and compared to a well executed home audio system, live sound kind of sounds terrible. Most acoustic instruments by themselves don't sound great. Do people actually want the sound of an un-mic'd unprocessed drum kit in their home? Home audio reproduction has always been about creating an engaging illusion. The entire art of mixing is there to create and aid the illusion.
Well live sound is not always good but it's loud, and when the sound is good AND loud...... for the vast majority of people it's an experience they will never have at home

For me live and studio are complementary, both for acoustic music where it's nice to hear the real thing, and amplified music where it is also often a great experience in addition to the studio
 
Yes, they do project sound.

There you go, subjective review completed
If that's how you choose your costly hi-fi, please listen to it on your own!
 
Last edited:
Most acoustic instruments by themselves don't sound great.
???
I have never heard a (nicely made) instrument sound bad when played by formally educated people, except if you do it on purpose.

(not that we can reproduce that at home of course, no matter how big and accurate our set-up is but we can at least get close to the usable DR with a well treated room and adequate speakers and electronics. Think of a control room with its nice, big mains)
 
The very best passive crossovers are very effective these days, but if the drivers are properly designed and implemented, I'd still suggest that going active is a far better option for peeps like us! properly done, dsp doesn't need to be heavy-handed either and sonically, I gather that's the best way for our ears and minds to respond to...

The thing is, 'active' as a concept simply hasn't caught on in the great unwashed audiophile-land and dealers don't like all-in-one options as they can't sell up to more expensive amps and so on (it's all about money/profit for most, if not survival in dealerships here in the UK once the pension-pots run dry prior to tax increases and so on).

I mentioned before that the already expensive ATC 100A SE (fancy cabinet, more expensive to make discrete and separated active card and so on at around forty-two grand [£] from memory) is easily better than a Naim/Kudos active set (they claim hearing only in the design) costing upwards of £120k. My local dealer has several clients halfway up the Naim ladder and they'd lose a bomb if they sold or traded it all in for the ATCs say (Genelec and Neumann not available via a domestic network I believe). PMC are now offering active amp plates to replace the passive ones on some of their stylish slimline models but no idea of the takeup here.


So, arguably a good thing for KEF to keep these Blades passive, as it opens up the market for buyers. Got to say I was disappointed to read here a while ago about reliability issues with the active LS50s and after-care seemingly not being quite as thorough as I'd have liked...
I would argue that the speakers (systems better) at the top price range (north of $200k maybe) do tend to use active filtering, at least at low, like Magico M9 for example.
Lots at cheaper too, just not too advertised.
 
It's weird to me that this whole discussion of the Blade One vs. Blade Two has happened without mentioning what seems to me to be the obvious goal of the Blade Two: achieve substantially the same performance of the Blade One while being smaller and much lighter.

Blade One:
1754424439202.png


Blade Two:

1754424462635.png


If you don't care about the size/weight differential, then getting the Blade One for cheaper seems to make sense. The mating of smaller woofers to the coaxial also gives the Blade Two slightly better directivity control, also.

Edit: Also, in terms of the material, KEF themselves describe it as "Made from an ultra-high density polyurethane composite".
 
If the speaker measures accurately, then it will reproduce your music accurately.

No one's asking about the emotional impact that a certain TV delivers for example.
If it has accurate color and luminance, then it'll faithfully reproduce whatever you're watching.

Same deal with speakers. They're tools, nothing more.
This!
Also, @Nuyes what smoothing was used with FR plot?
 
This!
Also, @Nuyes what smoothing was used with FR plot?
Was it smoothed or is that just a result of the resolution of the measurements?
 
Well the plot does say Klippel in the upper right corner...
Yes but Klippel has other products besides the NFS. I believe Nuyes uses the Klippel Analyzer, although I could be remembering the specific product incorrectly.
 
Well the plot does say Klippel in the upper right corner...
Klippel has a lot of products and the NFS isn't the only one
 
So, Nuyes didn't use any smoothing, that what you're saying? :)
 
1000113938.jpg

The Blade One Meta is only $7K more
Why would you want the smaller model if you're already paying that much?
 
So, Nuyes didn't use any smoothing, that what you're saying? :)
Nope, I was asking which is why I phrased it as a question. It's possible he's using smoothing, I just wouldn't assume that's the case given the difference in measurement methods. Most measurements are not nearly as high resolution as what you get from the Klippel NFS which is why they might look smoothed when they're in fact just the result of the measurement method.
 
Back
Top Bottom