That's more subjective than a Spinorama. We like how they look in our room precisely because they don't look like speakers.
Last edited:
-
Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!
KEF Blade Two Meta Review
- Thread starter Nuyes
- Start date
Multicore
Major Contributor
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2021
- Messages
- 3,984
- Likes
- 4,867
The answer to these questions seems obvious to me. To the consumer who's into the audiophile aesthetics and lifestyle KEF products offer the best value for money. On performance they beat most audiophile speakers, on looks they mostly deliver as audiophile-looking at their price point, and on price they are expensive enough to be proper audiophile while undercutting a lot of the market. If you want audiophile speakers and are prepared to pay then I recommend KEF in all seriousness.
I try to distance myself from audiophile but that's just me.
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2020
- Messages
- 351
- Likes
- 507
Great review. Nice to see how top of the line stuff measures up. Hmmm how much more or less do you gain or lose by choosing the R11 meta?..
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2020
- Messages
- 351
- Likes
- 507
you mount 3 of these to a wind turbine and have a great outdoor speaker as well.
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2020
- Messages
- 873
- Likes
- 2,058
You gain more low-end and a smoother frequency response, you lose your wife and/or children.
R11 meta + 2 subs + room treatments still leaves, I don’t know...13-14k in the bank.
Cote Dazur
Addicted to Fun and Learning
“I believe it will deliver exceptional results — no matter where you place it.”
Really?
Really?
IngMishael
Active Member
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2024
- Messages
- 196
- Likes
- 230
Erin's review marries the two and it's worth checking out. I understand you though
Did I miss something in this Blade review - how do they actually sound? What other equipment were they paired with?
I know this is a measurements-biased forum, but some objective or even subjective feedback on whether these speakers delivered sounds that sounded like music, is surely what music lovers are looking for. If we are not music lovers, why do we consider luxuries such as Blade speakers? I'm confused!
Curvature
Major Contributor
- Joined
- May 20, 2022
- Messages
- 1,938
- Likes
- 2,932
Same data but presented using extraction, including an on-axis measurement from KEF as well. The small variations are interesting.
On axis FR: Using an image editing program, I copy-pasted Nuyes' measurements on Erin's and adjusted the graph to the same scale. Black = Erin, green = Nuyes. Nuyes' measurements have too much smoothing. Above about 1kHz, the two measurements are quite comparable, including the small dip at about 1.5kHz and the treble roll-off at about 16kHz. Below 200Hz, Nuyes' measurements are more lumpy, probably indicating limitations of his measurement setup. But it does capture the roll-off below 25Hz, although it appears to roll-off a bit earlier with Nuyes.
I would tend to agree with @sigbergaudio. Using the same technique I took the data from the peaks of MTD graph to create a rough room response, since that chart shows the most room effects, and compared it to the compression chart. There is some similarity. Maybe the culprit is that different windows are used from chart to chart in Nuyes' reviews.
Compression test, Erin (left) vs. Nuyes (right). Erin does his test down to 40Hz, Nuyes stops at 100Hz. Both tests use the conventional +/-3dB vertical scale. Erin starts his test at 86dB, Nuyes starts his test at 76dB. The results are dramatically different. Erin tested to a louder volume (102dB) than Nuyes (96dB), yet his results show remarkable linearity. Nuyes shows +/-1dB on the same test. Nuyes' results are also really jagged with a lot of tweeter distortion, despite testing at a lower SPL than Erin.
So: either Erin was measuring at a lower SPL than indicated, or Nuyes was testing at a higher SPL than indicated. Either that, or there is something wrong with Nuyes' sample.
Keith_W
Master Contributor
@Curvature how did you extract an impulse response from an image?
Curvature
Major Contributor
- Joined
- May 20, 2022
- Messages
- 1,938
- Likes
- 2,932
https://automeris.io/ Excellent tool. For the MTD graph I used the peak values of each tone, to be clear, as plotted.
A little more zoom on the compression results, with Erin's included.
sceptical1
Active Member
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2025
- Messages
- 157
- Likes
- 133
sceptical1
Active Member
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2025
- Messages
- 157
- Likes
- 133
Erin's review shows -3db at 31hz. Nuyes shows what looks to be the FR not including the port output?
.IngMishael
Active Member
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2024
- Messages
- 196
- Likes
- 230
Well that's a false equivalence. Home audio isn't livePoint source vs wide dispersion.
I haven't heard a live concert yet that was Point Source based.
staticV3
Grand Contributor
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2019
- Messages
- 13,737
- Likes
- 23,540
Ah yes, as opposed to the numerous MTM-based concertsPoint source vs wide dispersion.
I haven't heard a live concert yet that was Point Source based.
I hope this isn't supposed to be an argument against point source because if it is, it's stupid.
"Never seen a quantum-depth lit vista in real life before" etc etc
Point source vs wide dispersion.
I haven't heard a live concert yet that was Point Source based.
Point source doesn't sound like it ..sounds like it sounds. More like the opposite.
I would love to see how you can design a speaker that is actually concert-wide-dispersion. The world's largest Magnepans perhaps?Point source vs wide dispersion.
I haven't heard a live concert yet that was Point Source based.
(Wisdom Audio Infinite Grande, circa early 2000s at CES) …Similar threads
