Subject to further discussion, I certainly don't think readers should be comparing speakers where one set of measurements is yours and the other is Amir's.
Since the veracity of the measurements has been called into question, let's compare
@Nuyes measurements with
Erin's. It is not my intention to criticize Erin or Nuyes, I am only comparing the two measurement sets to see how similar/different they are.
On axis FR: Using an image editing program, I copy-pasted Nuyes' measurements on Erin's and adjusted the graph to the same scale. Black = Erin, green = Nuyes. Nuyes' measurements have too much smoothing. Above about 1kHz, the two measurements are quite comparable, including the small dip at about 1.5kHz and the treble roll-off at about 16kHz. Below 200Hz, Nuyes' measurements are more lumpy, probably indicating limitations of his measurement setup. But it does capture the roll-off below 25Hz, although it appears to roll-off a bit earlier with Nuyes.
Horizontal Contour Plot, Erin (left) vs Nuyes (right). Both are using the same colour scale where one colour transition equals -3dB, but the difference is that Nuyes did not normalize his plot to 0dB so the contour plots are not strictly comparable. Regardless, with an eye of faith you can see that they are about the same.
Polar Plot, Erin (left) vs. Nuyes (right). I took the liberty of flipping Erin's plot upside down for easier comparison. The difference is that Nuyes chose to normalize the plot to the same SPL so we can compare the directivity at different frequencies. Erin did not. So even though the two graphs are not directly comparable, it is remarkable how similar they look.
Compression test, Erin (left) vs. Nuyes (right). Erin does his test down to 40Hz, Nuyes stops at 100Hz. Both tests use the conventional +/-3dB vertical scale. Erin starts his test at 86dB, Nuyes starts his test at 76dB. The results are dramatically different. Erin tested to a louder volume (102dB) than Nuyes (96dB), yet his results show remarkable linearity. Nuyes shows +/-1dB on the same test. Nuyes' results are also really jagged with a lot of tweeter distortion, despite testing at a lower SPL than Erin.
So: either Erin was measuring at a lower SPL than indicated, or Nuyes was testing at a higher SPL than indicated. Either that, or there is something wrong with Nuyes' sample.
Impedance vs. Frequency, Erin (left) vs Nuyes (right). There is nothing to see here except different vertical scales.
IMO the two sets of measurements are very much in agreement with the exception of the compression test.
