Fiberglass isn’t necessarily that woven material. It also applies to injection molded and/or compression molded thermoset resins and thermoplastics if they incorporate glass fillers. Think fiberglass boats, surfboards, Corvette body panels, etc.
-
Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!
KEF Blade Two Meta Review
- Thread starter Nuyes
- Start date
Makes sense it would be polyurethane foam. Considering the weight of the speakers, probably a very dense foam.
Digital_Thor
Addicted to Fun and Learning
Oh, I love the honesty, by using the word 'might', rather than claiming it as something you'd most certainly would hear
I bought a set of LS50 Meta to compare directly in my home, to all my DIY creativity, which also included some DIY with the dedicated midrange KEF coax from the 2018 version of KEF R3, that I was lucky to find on EBAY.
Actually, I find them so good, that I would buy a used set of KEF R3, and just take out the Coax for DIY.
You really have to sit calmly at home and listen - I mean - you need to come home and turn on the system, and just say "yes". Otherwise, something is off, and back to the drawing board you go
I read that coax drivers are much more immune to baffle edges, and we see that KEF reference gets by really well, with a very edgy box... no smoothness in that design - especially compared to Blade. So I put together a simple square box for the KEF coax, and made a rather simple cross-over in my DSP, that was crossed a little lower than the 2018 model(around 2800Hz) - meaning - closer to the Meta (around 2200Hz).
Then I used a bit of EQ on the LS50 Meta - from the official data and my own measurements - and compared them to my DIY KEF coax - non Meta.
Proper EQ, made from well-made data, gets you very, very close to the Meta "sound", with a 2018 non-Meta coax, IMO. Though, there is that difference, that the LS50 Meta, uses a bass/midrange, rather than the dedicated midrange that I have from the R3. So, take that into mind, because, maybe... just maybe, it makes a difference in your experience - I haven't tried, so I simply do not know if a KEF R3 Meta dedicated midrange, would be the king in this comparison.
And, this is yet another difference compared to the Blades, which have twice the "pressings" in the midrange cone, making them push the break-up further in frequency, without the rubber bonding/damping between the coil and cone, that they introduced in the 2018 versions. Maybe I remember wrongly, but I think that is the main difference + the more compact neo-magnet system, so that the rear of the cone can breathe more easily, much improved motor system in general and all sorts of little things, that just makes it stand out in every way.
What I'm trying to say is, that you have to have everything dialed in, before you can make any proper judgement between two or more speakers.
We change how we hear on the basis of sleep, food, health, age and so on. So you have to look into the aspects of enjoyment, longevity and everyday life - at the same time.
So when I come home now, and turn on my KEF DIY, then I just enjoy them, no matter if it's youtube, movies or music. Which to me is THAT difference, that makes the most lasting point, in choosing a speaker
Audio Science Pal
Active Member
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2022
- Messages
- 275
- Likes
- 411
The "decoupled diaphragm" is an interesting feature.
from LS50 Meta brochure;
from Blade brochure;
decoupling interface appears to be incomplete in this cut-away illustration?
Digital_Thor
Addicted to Fun and Learning
Exactly... it was THE feature, that really made me aim for KEF coax, since almost every midrange driver has break-up problems, and the first time I really experienced it, was with an Accuton midrange, where I clearly heard the annoying distortion from the break-up right there in the middle of our most sensitive hearing range.
I tried the Dayton RS125, because it did not break-up before almost 10kHz, so crossing at 2kHz should totally steer clear of this, but this driver is better at bass, than higher frequency clarity - IMO.
Then there was the Satori MW13TX that was the best midrange for me so far, but the coax "sound" just fits me the best. The coherent way to have all upper frequencies coming from one place with such ease, is something I've always longed for, and it provides a very good sound stage in my room, like the sound comes from my TV and I almost forget that I have speakers.
I just really enjoy how hard-cones have a much smoother and more even off-axis than softer midrange cones. And I've always preferred the harder cones, since I experience that they provide more "clarity", which might just be, because of the better overall frequency response at all axis'.
But KEF seems to have mastered the combination of durability, sound quality, technical honesty, proper documentation and data, at a price where I have a chance
I tried the Dayton RS125, because it did not break-up before almost 10kHz, so crossing at 2kHz should totally steer clear of this, but this driver is better at bass, than higher frequency clarity - IMO.
Then there was the Satori MW13TX that was the best midrange for me so far, but the coax "sound" just fits me the best. The coherent way to have all upper frequencies coming from one place with such ease, is something I've always longed for, and it provides a very good sound stage in my room, like the sound comes from my TV and I almost forget that I have speakers.
I just really enjoy how hard-cones have a much smoother and more even off-axis than softer midrange cones. And I've always preferred the harder cones, since I experience that they provide more "clarity", which might just be, because of the better overall frequency response at all axis'.
But KEF seems to have mastered the combination of durability, sound quality, technical honesty, proper documentation and data, at a price where I have a chance
Digital_Thor
Addicted to Fun and Learning
I love dark blue, but the Garnet one is kinda nice too. I guess, if you can afford them, you also have a room suitable for them... At least you should try... Harder
ban25
Major Contributor
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2022
- Messages
- 1,280
- Likes
- 1,349
Mine are Frosted Blue. They definitely catch your eye in the room!I love dark blue, but the Garnet one is kinda nice too. I guess, if you can afford them, you also have a room suitable for them... At least you should try... Harder
I love my KEF Blade2 Metas. I got them new about 4 months ago after hearing them at a friend's house. I decided to sell my fantastic Revel Salon2s as the prices for Revel speakers seemed to be falling (after they discontinued the Salons) but also the prices inexplicably were falling for the wonderful F328Be as well. It makes no sense, but I found a great guy that is loving my Salons which enabled me to move on to the Blade2 metas.
I like using the foam plugs in my room (18’x16.5’x8’) and use a pair of KC92 subs, each located midway up my side walls. Without the plugs the Blade2s seem to load the room and excite the LF in an odd way.
I also swapped out a pair of Denafrips Thallo amps that I was using in passive bi-amp mode with a pair of Pass xa60.8 (mono) amps. This was a much bigger improvement than I would have imagined. Spatially, the Pass amps do a much better job floating images in their space, but the biggest change is the tightness of the bass out of the Blades. The biggest downside is the heat/power consumption from 2 Class A amps… The Thallo is a fantastic amp, but I am guessing the low impedance of the Blade is more demanding than they really like.
I like using the foam plugs in my room (18’x16.5’x8’) and use a pair of KC92 subs, each located midway up my side walls. Without the plugs the Blade2s seem to load the room and excite the LF in an odd way.
I also swapped out a pair of Denafrips Thallo amps that I was using in passive bi-amp mode with a pair of Pass xa60.8 (mono) amps. This was a much bigger improvement than I would have imagined. Spatially, the Pass amps do a much better job floating images in their space, but the biggest change is the tightness of the bass out of the Blades. The biggest downside is the heat/power consumption from 2 Class A amps… The Thallo is a fantastic amp, but I am guessing the low impedance of the Blade is more demanding than they really like.
After much fussing, I see we have settled on a similar toe-in, which is very little.
Sokel
Grand Contributor
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2021
- Messages
- 10,467
- Likes
- 11,329
The AR at the bottom of the rack is one I know very well .
How do you manage subs, delays, etc?
Good question! I forgot to mention I use a miniDSP Flex (sitting on top of the Rega turntable controller) to manage the subs using REW.
Sokel
Grand Contributor
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2021
- Messages
- 10,467
- Likes
- 11,329
Similar threads
