It's easier to ask how many don't, generally too. Depending on how low in terms of hearing damage you put the threshold, it's not an epidemic but what we call "Volkskrankheit" in German - a common disease virtually everyone has.Makes you wonder how many people who obsesses over the power output of headphone amps have hearing damage...
2/3 volume on Android for my JM20 Max + HD650 is a already plenty loud for me.
It's easier to ask how many don't, generally too. Depending on how low in terms of hearing damage you put the threshold, it's not an epidemic but what we call "Volkskrankheit" in German - a common disease virtually everyone has.
Afaik, tinnitus is just a symptom, and the cause can hardly ever be treated successfully. The usual "treatments" are largely palliative.I found the article entertaining and somewhat useful.
But I found two points very entertaining. Don't remove ear wax and treat the Tinnitus. I am sure people can try both and report back with any success they might have had. Wax build up is individual and should be treated as such. Tinnitus, yeah know a few people that treated it without any sucesss.
None of that applies to music listening unless your music is constant, broadband noise for those entire durations. I have corrected these claims multiple times and even done a video on it. Please don't keep posting it. It is just nonsense.Safe for human hearing:
85dB: Safe for 8 hours
91dB: Safe for only 2 hours
100 dB: Damage can occur within 15 minutes
115 dB: Hearing damage can occur within 30 seconds
120 dB: Often cited as the human threshold of pain
130dB: Can cause immediate, permanent damage to the structure of the inner ear.
While I would not want to test it, I theorize the difference between 115.79dB and 116.46dB will mostly be measured by the brain in pain levels - not sound quality.
None of that applies to music listening unless your music is constant, broadband noise for those entire durations. I have corrected these claims multiple times and even done a video on it. Please don't keep posting it. It is just nonsense.
Once more, we don't listen to noise much less on repeated basis. Massive power is needed in bass frequencies in music where our ears have little sensitivity to.Repeated short term exposure to loud noise has a cumulative and permanent effect, period.
Please define "short term", "loud", and what frequency we are talking about.Repeated short term exposure to loud noise has a cumulative and permanent effect, period.
https://hearingandme.com/can-loud-music-cause-hearing-loss-understanding-the-risks-and-prevention/Once more, we don't listen to noise much less on repeated basis. Massive power is needed in bass frequencies in music where our ears have little sensitivity to.
You're not providing enough information to make a good judgement. What sources? Is 85dB average or peak? How is that SPL level determined: A- or C-weighted (or some other weighting)? What is an "extended period"? You're not doing anyone favors with vague statements that lack any sort of technical details.I would suggest people who value their hearing do their own research. Most sources indicate prolonged music listening above 85db for extended periods can create a negative impact on human hearing. The longer the listening period and the higher the volume the more impact. Taking advice on this topic from people on an audio forum is not the best protection for ones ears.
I don't think the author realizes the irony of giving this advice on this topic in an audio forum.Taking advice on this topic from people on an audio forum is not the best protection for ones ears.
No good for me - far too much sugar sadly - and I love orange juice