• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Kali LP-6 Review: Studio Monitor

LTig

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 27, 2019
Messages
5,759
Likes
9,433
Location
Europe
I think the small bass droop we see here (and in a few preceding measurements) is caused by low temperature. Here it really looks like KH80DSP #1.
 

Juhazi

Major Contributor
Joined
Sep 15, 2018
Messages
1,717
Likes
2,897
Location
Finland
So, basically sound of 650-1100Hz comes from the pipe, not the driver... I'd like to see impulse and step responses (on-axis)
 

ROOSKIE

Major Contributor
Joined
Feb 27, 2020
Messages
1,912
Likes
3,390
Location
Minneapolis
Not sure if this speaker has internal ADC + DSP, but if it does, I would expect the manufacturer to do the EQ for me. If it doesn't then, perhaps they should consider that if its the more economical way towards better response.
Well I suppose with all due respect you can expect whatever you wish.
Reality is that they are $298 and decent DSP software programs are free and additionally a basic MiniDSP physical unit is $100usd.
Great way to have excellent sound and get to play with DSP which IMHO is fun.
Plus you will need that DSP/PEQ for room correction anyway.
 

Francis Vaughan

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Dec 6, 2018
Messages
933
Likes
4,696
Location
Adelaide Australia
+ another measurement review with high-res PCB photo

Well the really interesting part of that review is the photos comparing the PCB with that from an LSR 306. Apart from a small amount of tweaking of the layout the PCB, the Kali is identical to the JBL. Really, they would appear to contain essentially the same electronics.
 

napilopez

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Oct 17, 2018
Messages
2,080
Likes
8,318
Location
NYC
Seems like a fantastic choice for the price! The horizontal beam width is one of the very best we've seen, I think. The only thing that really seems to need EQing is that resonance at 1 kHz that I doubt would show its face too often.

I've not seen measurements of the 306p, but compared to the 305P at least, there appear to be far fewer significant resonances:

Screenshot_20200531-121337.png


The Kali also has a more neutral tonal balance.

The caveat being that this was one of the very first speakers amir reviewed and I'm not 100 percent sure if some of the treble bumps are from the speaker or the rig. But looks like the speaker.
 

3125b

Major Contributor
Joined
May 18, 2020
Messages
1,351
Likes
2,201
Location
Germany
Considering the price, 300$ including the amps, this is pretty impressive. Of course you can get better speakers for more money, but then again, you can certainly get worse for way more money as well.
I haven't heard these Kali irl, but from what I have heard I'd really like to see the Focal Alpha 65 measured, see how they stack up against some of the other choices. They are unusually bulky for theis small woofers and I think they sound excellent for their price.
 

Robbo99999

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 23, 2020
Messages
6,847
Likes
6,663
Location
UK
Nice speaker for the money for sure! Doesn't seem too far off character from the JBL 308p Mkii which was reviewed here (https://www.audiosciencereview.com/...ds/jbl-308p-mkii-studio-monitor-review.17338/), although 308p is 8" woofer vs the 6.5" of the Kali, but the reach of the bass is quite similar. Also the distortion levels and patterns are similar (at least at 86dB) with it having a peak between 1-2kHz:
Kali:
1606728857764.png

JBL 308p Mkii:
1606728889380.png

However my in-room measurements at a broadly equivalent 86dB/1metre show a lot lower distortion in my 308p speakers:
absolute max listening level (percentage).jpg

absolute max listening level.jpg
I also think the 308p has slightly better directivity if you look at the spinoramas, but they're both good on that front. Kali wins on price here in the UK though, 308p is about £200 (although I got mine for £150 in March) whereas Kali is £135. I think I'm leaning towards the 308p as being a better speaker though because the spinorama is better with a smoother frequency response & directivity, and I think distortion is similar although my particular sample of 308p doesn't seem to suffer from it as bad......I also don't like 1kHz sharp resonance peak in the Kali which is in like the most sensitive to our hearing part of the frequency response. This Kali is a nice speaker though, and probably slightly better value than the 308p in the UK.

EDIT: Kali LP-8 might be a better/fairer contender against JBL 308p as LP-8 is 8" woofer:
https://smile.amazon.co.uk/Kali-Aud...eywords=Kali+Audio+LP-8&qid=1606729365&sr=8-1 and is also about £15 cheaper than the 308p here in the UK. Would quite like to see the LP-8 reviewed here.
 
Last edited:

Hayabusa

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Oct 12, 2019
Messages
778
Likes
517
Location
Abu Dhabi
@amirs:

The directivity plots indicate r=10meter.
Most listening distances are much shorter that that.
The closer you get the more irregularties you would expect to happen in the directivity plots.
So would a more 'typical' r=(3-4 meters?) be use full in showing what happens at the listening position directivy wise?
 

tuga

Major Contributor
Joined
Feb 5, 2020
Messages
3,984
Likes
4,281
Location
Oxford, England
So, basically sound of 650-1100Hz comes from the pipe, not the driver... I'd like to see impulse and step responses (on-axis)

I'd like to see the step response of all measured speakers, and the CSD.

The Kali LP-6 despite its ridiculously low price produced excellent performance.
Excellent performance?

Directivity perhaps, but what else...
 

MZKM

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Dec 1, 2018
Messages
4,237
Likes
11,434
Location
Land O’ Lakes, FL
the above measurements have extended response to 30 kHz.
Is this going to be standard moving forward? If so, that’s good as many metal dome tweeters have a ~27kHz resonance that may get activated with ultrasonic issues during vinyl playback (which will cause IMD in the audible range; and while an IMD test would be awesome, just seeing THD distortion ~27kHz is fine).
 

Bruce Morgen

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Aug 3, 2019
Messages
851
Likes
1,213
I'd like to see the step response of all measured speakers, and the CSD.

The Kali LP-6 despite its ridiculously low price produced excellent performance.
Excellent performance?

Directivity perhaps, but what else...

I think what's clearly implied by the sentence you cited is the product's excellent price/performance ratio rather than "excellent performance" in some sort of absolute sense of that phrase, e.g. when compared to cost-is-no-object-monitor designs like the $20k USD Kii Three system.
 

tuga

Major Contributor
Joined
Feb 5, 2020
Messages
3,984
Likes
4,281
Location
Oxford, England
I think what's clearly implied by the sentence you cited is the product's excellent price/performance ratio rather than "excellent performance" in some sort of absolute sense of that phrase, e.g. when compared to cost-is-no-object-monitor designs like the $20k USD Kii Three system.

Perhaps it would make more sense to write that then, "excellent price/performance ratio".

Soon people will be writing in forums that these Kali speakers are the Topping of the speaker world, like David, able to knock down the speakers costing 10x as much...

Meanwhile small desktop speakers are listened to nearfield, where directivity quality is often a negligeable or at least minor parameter.
 

Bruce Morgen

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Aug 3, 2019
Messages
851
Likes
1,213
Perhaps it would make more sense to write that then, "excellent price/performance ratio".

Soon people will be writing in forums that these Kali speakers are the Topping of the speaker world, like David, able to knock down the speakers costing 10x as much...

Meanwhile small desktop speakers are listened to nearfield, where directivity quality is often a negligeable or at least minor parameter.

Amir's clear implication suffices for yours truly, but I take your point.
 

Maiky76

Senior Member
Joined
May 28, 2020
Messages
439
Likes
3,680
Location
French, living in China
Hi,

Here is my take on the EQ.

Some data for the LP8 is available here
https://www.audiosciencereview.com/...orama-and-eq-design-inside.16689/#post-539358

The raw data with corrected ER and PIR:

Score no EQ: 5.18
With Sub: 7.06
Spinorama with no EQ:
  • Too bad for the resonances in the 600 - 1500Hz range
  • The directivity is excellent, good candidate for EQ
  • Decent LF for the size without large boost in the 100-200Hz range, may be temperature dependent.
Kali LP6 No EQ Spinorama.png

Directivity:
Better stay at tweeter height
Horizontally, almost perfect 0 t0 +/-20deg maybe toe-in the speakers by 10deg and have the axis crossing in front of the listening location could help dosing the reflexions .
Kali LP6 LW better data.png

Kali LP6 2D surface Directivity Contour Only Data.png

EQ design:
I have generated two EQs. The APO config files are attached.
  • The first one, labelled, LW is targeted at making the LW flat
  • The second, labelled Score, starts with the first one and adds the score as an optimization variable.
  • The EQs are designed in the context of regular stereo use i.e. domestic environment, no warranty is provided for a near field use in a studio environment although the LW might be better suited for this purpose.
  • It would be great if we had some measurements of the built in controls, they may make additional EQ redundant as we saw with the JBL 308p mkII
Kali LP6 EQ Design.png


Score EQ LW: 5.72
with sub: 7.66
Score EQ Score: 6.24
with sub: 8.12
Code:
Kali LP6 APO EQ LW 96000Hz
November302020-180916

Preamp: -1.3 dB

Filter 1: ON HPQ Fc 45.7 Hz Gain 0 dB Q 1.01
Filter 2: ON PK Fc 126 Hz Gain -0.79 dB Q 3.48
Filter 3: ON PK Fc 326 Hz Gain -0.84 dB Q 6.08
Filter 4: ON PK Fc 991 Hz Gain -3.14 dB Q 13.5
Filter 5: ON PK Fc 1759 Hz Gain -2.1 dB Q 3.85
Filter 6: ON PK Fc 2302 Hz Gain -1 dB Q 4.73
Filter 7: ON PK Fc 14756 Hz Gain -1.11 dB Q 6.59

Kali LP6 APO EQ LW 96000Hz
November302020-175738

Preamp: -1.3 dB

Filter 1: ON HPQ Fc 45.7 Hz Gain 0 dB Q 1.01
Filter 2: ON PK Fc 130 Hz Gain -0.71 dB Q 2.42
Filter 3: ON PK Fc 331 Hz Gain -1.06 dB Q 3.7
Filter 4: ON PK Fc 983 Hz Gain -4.4 dB Q 14.3
Filter 5: ON PK Fc 1777 Hz Gain -2.6 dB Q 2.85
Filter 6: ON PK Fc 2448 Hz Gain -1.62 dB Q 7.22
Filter 7: ON PK Fc 3533 Hz Gain -0.95 dB Q 5.88
Filter 8: ON PK Fc 6973 Hz Gain -1.3 dB Q 0.84
Filter 9: ON PK Fc 14813 Hz Gain -2.26 dB Q 4.85

Spinorama EQ LW
Kali LP6 EQ LW Spinorama.png

Spinorama EQ Score
Kali LP6 EQ Score Spinorama.png

Zoom PIR-LW-ON
Kali LP6 Zoom PIR-LW-ON.png

Regression - Tonal
Kali LP6 Regression-Tonal.png

Radar no EQ vs EQ score not night and day
Kali LP6 EQ Score Radar.png

The rest of the plots are attached.

At 300USD/pair including the amps go find something better...
 

Attachments

  • Kali LP6 APO EQ Score 96000Hz.txt
    490 bytes · Views: 204
  • Kali LP6 APO EQ LW 96000Hz.txt
    394 bytes · Views: 150
  • Kali LP6 2D surface Directivity Contour Data.png
    Kali LP6 2D surface Directivity Contour Data.png
    275.3 KB · Views: 116
  • Kali LP6 3D surface Vertical Directivity Data.png
    Kali LP6 3D surface Vertical Directivity Data.png
    464 KB · Views: 105
  • Kali LP6 3D surface Horizontal Directivity Data.png
    Kali LP6 3D surface Horizontal Directivity Data.png
    461.4 KB · Views: 136
  • Kali LP6 Normalized Directivity data.png
    Kali LP6 Normalized Directivity data.png
    480.8 KB · Views: 104
  • Kali LP6 Raw Directivity data.png
    Kali LP6 Raw Directivity data.png
    823.1 KB · Views: 107
  • Kali LP6 Reflexion data.png
    Kali LP6 Reflexion data.png
    245 KB · Views: 126
  • Kali LP6 LW data.png
    Kali LP6 LW data.png
    254.2 KB · Views: 208

thewas

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 15, 2020
Messages
6,668
Likes
15,916
Also the distortion levels and patterns are similar (at least at 86dB) with it having a peak between 1-2kHz:
Kali:
index.php

JBL 308p Mkii:
index.php
Interesting that the smaller 6,5" Kali woofer is quite superior to the 8" JBL woofer in the mid and upper bass distortion at 96dB, am curious how then the Kali LP-8 will do.
 

Robbo99999

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 23, 2020
Messages
6,847
Likes
6,663
Location
UK
Interesting that the smaller 6,5" Kali woofer is quite superior to the 8" JBL woofer in the mid and upper bass distortion at 96dB, am curious how then the Kali LP-8 will do.
True!
 

Robbo99999

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 23, 2020
Messages
6,847
Likes
6,663
Location
UK
Hi,

Here is my take on the EQ.

Some data for the LP8 is available here
https://www.audiosciencereview.com/...orama-and-eq-design-inside.16689/#post-539358

The raw data with corrected ER and PIR:

Score no EQ: 5.18
With Sub: 7.06
Spinorama with no EQ:
  • Too bad for the resonances in the 600 - 1500Hz range
  • The directivity is excellent, good candidate for EQ
  • Decent LF for the size without large boost in the 100-200Hz range, may be temperature dependent.
View attachment 96583
Directivity:
Better stay at tweeter height
Horizontally, almost perfect 0 t0 +/-20deg maybe toe-in the speakers by 10deg and have the axis crossing in front of the listening location could help dosing the reflexions .
View attachment 96592
View attachment 96584
EQ design:
I have generated two EQs. The APO config files are attached.
  • The first one, labelled, LW is targeted at making the LW flat
  • The second, labelled Score, starts with the first one and adds the score as an optimization variable.
  • The EQs are designed in the context of regular stereo use i.e. domestic environment, no warranty is provided for a near field use in a studio environment although the LW might be better suited for this purpose.
  • It would be great if we had some measurements of the built in controls, they may make additional EQ redundant as we saw with the JBL 308p mkII
View attachment 96579

Score EQ LW: 5.72
with sub: 7.66
Score EQ Score: 6.24
with sub: 8.12
Code:
Kali LP6 APO EQ LW 96000Hz
November302020-180916

Preamp: -1.3 dB

Filter 1: ON HPQ Fc 45.7 Hz Gain 0 dB Q 1.01
Filter 2: ON PK Fc 126 Hz Gain -0.79 dB Q 3.48
Filter 3: ON PK Fc 326 Hz Gain -0.84 dB Q 6.08
Filter 4: ON PK Fc 991 Hz Gain -3.14 dB Q 13.5
Filter 5: ON PK Fc 1759 Hz Gain -2.1 dB Q 3.85
Filter 6: ON PK Fc 2302 Hz Gain -1 dB Q 4.73
Filter 7: ON PK Fc 14756 Hz Gain -1.11 dB Q 6.59

Kali LP6 APO EQ LW 96000Hz
November302020-175738

Preamp: -1.3 dB

Filter 1: ON HPQ Fc 45.7 Hz Gain 0 dB Q 1.01
Filter 2: ON PK Fc 130 Hz Gain -0.71 dB Q 2.42
Filter 3: ON PK Fc 331 Hz Gain -1.06 dB Q 3.7
Filter 4: ON PK Fc 983 Hz Gain -4.4 dB Q 14.3
Filter 5: ON PK Fc 1777 Hz Gain -2.6 dB Q 2.85
Filter 6: ON PK Fc 2448 Hz Gain -1.62 dB Q 7.22
Filter 7: ON PK Fc 3533 Hz Gain -0.95 dB Q 5.88
Filter 8: ON PK Fc 6973 Hz Gain -1.3 dB Q 0.84
Filter 9: ON PK Fc 14813 Hz Gain -2.26 dB Q 4.85

Spinorama EQ LW
View attachment 96580
Spinorama EQ Score
View attachment 96582
Zoom PIR-LW-ON
View attachment 96577
Regression - Tonal
View attachment 96578
Radar no EQ vs EQ score not night and day
View attachment 96581
The rest of the plots are attached.

At 300USD/pair including the amps go find something better...
LP-8 definitely looks like an excellent contender given the impressive Preference Score you gave it in your link (6.24 Preference Score).....yeah would be great to see LP-8 measured here.
 
Top Bottom