• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Jensen PI-XX Isolation Transformer Review

Rate this isolation transformer:

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 3 3.4%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 10 11.2%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther)

    Votes: 59 66.3%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 17 19.1%

  • Total voters
    89

amirm

Founder/Admin
Staff Member
CFO (Chief Fun Officer)
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Messages
48,896
Likes
287,317
Location
Seattle Area
This is a review and detailed measurements of the Jensen ISO-MAX IP-XX balanced isolation transformer. It is on kind loan from a member and costs US $220.
Jensen Iso-Max PI-XX single channel line input isolator balanced review.jpg

While the enclosure is small, it is quite heavy for its size and feels solid as a rock. The weight likely comes from the transformer which passively provides isolation between input and outputs. Standard balanced inputs should provide fair amount of that already but this steps that up in case you are still getting hum and buzz. Here are the company bullet points:
  • Eliminates hum and buzz caused by ground loops
  • Delivers exceptionally low distortion down to 20 Hz
  • Ruler flat frequency response from 5 Hz to 40 kHz
  • Plug and play easy to use, no power required
Let's see if it meets the detailed specs the company provides.

Jensen ISO-MAX PI-XX Measurements
I treat the box as if it were a preamp and ran our standard dashboard:
Jensen ISO-MAX PI-XX isolation transformer balanced measurement.png

There is a small insertion loss, causing 0.1 volt minimal reduction in output voltage at the impedance used for testing (40/200K ohm). Third order harmonic is responsible for some 15 dB reduction from what the analyzer is capable of. But this is not the full story as they say. Distortion in transformers gets worse as frequencies go down. And also increase with voltage. Let's examine these effects:
Jensen ISO-MAX PI-XX isolation transformer balanced thd distortion vs frequency measurement.png

We see a pretty dramatic increase in distortion when sweeping backwards from 20 kHz. It is reasonable down to about 500 Hz below which, you start to compromise 16 bit fidelity. Lowering the voltage to 2 volts help but not much more below that. We can see this better in family of frequency and voltage sweeps:
Jensen ISO-MAX PI-XX isolation transformer balanced thd distortion vs level vs frequency measu...png


So best to stay below 2 volts. As transformers go though, these are pretty good distortion numbers.

There is naturally phase error proportional with frequency:
Jensen ISO-MAX PI-XX isolation transformer balanced phase measurement.png


Main claim to fame is isolation and we can test that with CMRR:
Jensen ISO-MAX PI-XX isolation transformer balanced CMRR measurement.png


These are very good numbers.

EDIT: Forgot the frequency response:
Jensen ISO-MAX PI-XX isolation transformer balanced frequency response measurement.png


Conclusions
If you have ground loops/mains leakage, any solution will mean Christmas coming early! :) Lots of solutions out there but many add noise and distortion. The Jensen PI-XX being transformer based, doesn't impact noise but does add distortion. It is a high quality transformer though and tolerates fair bit of input voltage before getting unhappy at lower frequencies. Ultimately though, you don't want to use it if you don't have to.

I am going to recommend the Jensen ISO-MAX PI-XX isolation transformer.
------------
As always, questions, comments, recommendations, etc. are welcome.

Appreciate any donations using: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/how-to-support-audio-science-review.8150/
 
Last edited:
Specs...

All levels are input unless noted, +4 dBu = 1.23 V RMS
Input impedance, Zi1 kHz, +4 dBu, test circuit 1
Insertion loss1 kHz, +4 dBu, test circuit 1
Magnitude response, ref 1 kHz20 Hz, +4 dBu, test circuit 1
Magnitude response, ref 1 kHz20 kHz, +4 dBu, test circuit 1
Deviation from linear phase (DLP)20 Hz to 20 kHz, +4 dBu, test circuit 1
Distortion (THD)1 kHz, +4 dBu, test circuit 1
Distortion (THD)20 Hz, +4 dBu, test circuit 1
Maximum 20 Hz input level1% THD, test circuit 1
Common – mode rejection ratio (CMRR) 600 Ω balanced / unbalanced source60 Hz, test circuit 2 / 3
Common – mode rejection ratio (CMRR) 600 Ω balanced / unbalanced source3 kHz, test circuit 2 / 3
Output impedance, Zo1 kHz, test circuit 1
Allowable source impedance(output impedance of device driving the ISO-MAX input)
Allowable load impedance(input impedance of device loading the ISO-MAX output)
Allowable load capacitance(cable & input capacitance loading the ISO-MAX output)
Optimal cable lengthinput
Temperature rangeoperation or storage
Input to Output Voltage Difference*any input to any output shield or any shield to case, 60 Hz
[td]
22.0 kΩ​
[/td][td]
23.5 kΩ​
[/td][td]
25.0 kΩ​
[/td]​
[td]
[/td][td]
1.6 dB​
[/td][td]
2.0 dB​
[/td]​
[td]
-0.15 dB​
[/td][td]
-0.03 dB​
[/td][td]
±0.0 dB​
[/td]​
[td]
-1.0dB​
[/td][td]
-0.70 dB​
[/td][td]
±0.0 dB​
[/td]​
[td]
[/td][td]
+1.4/-0°​
[/td][td]
±2.0°​
[/td]​
[td]
[/td][td]
<0.001%​
[/td][td]
[/td]​
[td]
[/td][td]
0.04%​
[/td][td]
0.10%​
[/td]​
[td]
+17 dBu​
[/td][td]
+19 dBu​
[/td][td]
[/td]​
[td]
[/td][td]
124 dB / 95 dB​
[/td][td]
[/td]​
[td]
85 dB​
[/td][td]
95 dB / 85 dB​
[/td][td]
[/td]​
[td]
[/td][td]
4.65 kΩ​
[/td][td]
[/td]​
[td]
0​
[/td][td]
600 Ω​
[/td][td]
2 kΩ​
[/td]​
[td]
10 kΩ​
[/td][td]
20 kΩ​
[/td][td]
[/td]​
[td]
0​
[/td][td]
50 pF​
[/td][td]
100 pF​
[/td]​
[td]
[/td][td]
1 m (3.3’)​
[/td][td]
3 m (9.8’)​
[/td]​
[td]
0°C​
[/td][td]
[/td][td]
70°C​
[/td]​
[td]
[/td][td]
[/td][td]
24 V RMS 34 V peak​
[/td]​
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ISO-MAX IP-XX
Just a slight typo there mate in the title, PI-XX. :)

Jensen do have some form of measurements on their site for this too;

1760597403051.png



This pic is the PI-2XX (2 channel version), not the PI-XX;

1760597677106.png


Thanks for the testing Amir as always.


JSmith
 
The complete datasheet linked in the post above yours.
Yeah saw that after I posted, but it includes the spec's which usually is reserved for @RickS to post, so I just took a screenshot of the AP measurements. :cool:

Certainly fairly detailed though, which compared to some other companies is very positive.


JSmith
 
Thanks @amirm for a very interesting review!
A variant of the same transformer from the reviewed box (Jensen JT-11P-1) is what I used to build my DIY reamp box (measured here).
Jensen transformers are pricy but they really are some of the best-performing audio transformers out there!
 
Thanks Amir. I really appreciate you looking closely at how distortion varies with respect to both frequency and amplitude.

This isn't something that I've thought about before, but would a fully balanced preamp with a high CMRR be able to achieve similar isolation?
 
Thanks Amir. I really appreciate you looking closely at how distortion varies with respect to both frequency and amplitude.
All this info (and more) is in the product datasheet, contrary to many budget components producers. Amir has just confirmed the datasheet plots, which is also respectable.
 
This is a review and detailed measurements of the Jensen ISO-MAX IP-XX balanced isolation transformer. It is on kind loan from a member and costs US $220.
View attachment 483421
While the enclosure is small, it is quite heavy for its size and feels solid as a rock. The weight likely comes from the transformer which passively provides isolation between input and outputs. Standard balanced inputs should provide fair amount of that already but this steps that up in case you are still getting hum and buzz. Here are the company bullet points:
  • Eliminates hum and buzz caused by ground loops
  • Delivers exceptionally low distortion down to 20 Hz
  • Ruler flat frequency response from 5 Hz to 40 kHz
  • Plug and play easy to use, no power required
Let's see if it meets the detailed specs the company provides.

Jensen ISO-MAX PI-XX Measurements
I treat the box as if it were a preamp and ran our standard dashboard:
View attachment 483422
There is a small insertion loss, causing 0.1 volt minimal reduction in output voltage at the impedance used for testing (40/200K ohm). Third order harmonic is responsible for some 15 dB reduction from what the analyzer is capable of. But this is not the full story as they say. Distortion in transformers gets worse as frequencies go down. And also increase with voltage. Let's examine these effects:
View attachment 483423
We see a pretty dramatic increase in distortion when sweeping backwards from 20 kHz. It is reasonable down to about 500 Hz below which, you start to compromise 16 bit fidelity. Lowering the voltage to 2 volts help but not much more below that. We can see this better in family of frequency and voltage sweeps:
View attachment 483424

So best to stay below 2 volts. As transformers go though, these are pretty good distortion numbers.

There is naturally phase error proportional with frequency:
View attachment 483425

Main claim to fame is isolation and we can test that with CMRR:
View attachment 483426

These are very good numbers.

Conclusions
If you have ground loops/mains leakage, any solution will mean Christmas coming early! :) Lots of solutions out there but many add noise and distortion. The Jensen PI-XX being transformer based, doesn't impact noise but does add distortion. It is a high quality transformer though and tolerates fair bit of input voltage before getting unhappy at lower frequencies. Ultimately though, you don't want to use it if you don't have to.

I am going to recommend the Jensen ISO-MAX PI-XX isolation transformer.
------------
As always, questions, comments, recommendations, etc. are welcome.

Appreciate any donations using: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/how-to-support-audio-science-review.8150/
Very interesting, thanks Amir.

I wonder how much commercially available music has passed through Jensen transformers!
 
Great, but couldn't they add a volume knob? It would be even better.
 
I assume there are no input coupling capacitors? I assume the winding resistance is very low, if so, be careful connecting the input to DC coupled devices!
 
I assume there are no input coupling capacitors? I assume the winding resistance is very low, if so, be careful connecting the input to DC coupled devices!
There will be no coupling capacitors (the capacitance had to be huge), only R-C on the secondary. However, your note is perfect. Even low DC voltage is an additional killer of transformer distortion and output DC from the preceding stage is to be kept below 1mV.

Below is the THD vs. frequency of quite good link transformer measured at 1.27Vrms. DC coupled (with output DC below 1mV) and AC coupled (2 x 1000uF inn series):

linktrafo.png
 
I wonder if transformer-coupled tube-output "purists" know their music has varying phase angle...
 
It is not a good idea. The trasformer circuit is to be balanced, adding a pot would kill the CMR and let the hum get through.
Thanks for your reply, but then I need more explanations.
Where to place a volume pot then? Upstream or downstream?
Why couldn't it be integrated to the device?
 
Back
Top Bottom