Waf factor matters for a lot of folks and sometimes it's an artistic/architectural choicePeople are this adverse to seeing speakers in their living room??
Honestly I don't look at the votes very closely most of the time... if you can't judge the measurements for yourself, the crowd can only help you so much.How are people supposed to vote this speaker? It's on false premises as the speaker is not measured as designed; painted inside a wall. I suggest removing the ability to vote on such cases as it makes zero sense to assess something not measured in its intended use case.
There is no upper limit on WAF. And not to blame wives, either... sometimes the look of a space is of overriding importance, and sound quality is not. JBL knows this and has found a way to make money on it.People are this adverse to seeing speakers in their living room??
I did too.I voted great on the ability to be *invisible* with 2mm of paint over it.
What is interesting is that Stealth makes an amplifier preprogrammed with EQ for their speakers. It’s described as a 11 band PEQ.
SA2400-MKII | Stealth Acoustics
www.stealthacoustics.com
And in case it wasn’t clear, Harman and Stealth work together
![]()
Harman and Stealth Acoustics Partner to Debut New JBL Invisible Loudspeakers at CEDIA Expo 2019
Harman and Stealth Acoustics have partnered to create four new invisible speakers designed to install like a drywall patch.www.cepro.com
Honestly I don't look at the votes very closely most of the time... if you can't judge the measurements for yourself, the crowd can only help you so much.
I think a room with these C62 covering every square inch of wall space would be really fun.![]()
For sure. Certainly in higher end houses. Look at this system we installed:People are this adverse to seeing speakers in their living room??
Seems like you have lost the plot. I measure all normal speakers anechoically. That isn't in its "intended use." We want room independent data and that is what you have here, with accommodation of it being mounted on a wall.I suggest removing the ability to vote on such cases as it makes zero sense to assess something not measured in its intended use case.
That's not really what I meant and you know it. So if we can lay off with the insults that'd be nice.Seems like you have lost the plot. I measure all normal speakers anechoically. That isn't in its "intended use." We want room independent data and that is what you have here, with accommodation of it being mounted on a wall.
No, it will not change dramatically with a few layers of paint. The surface is already painted. A millimeter or two of paint is not going to change much at all.This is not the same as your normal speaker. Would you say that we can assess this speaker and compare it to others, while the response will change dramatically when installed as per the manual with layers of paint?
No, I don't know what you meant. All I know is that you made the insulting remark regarding usability of my measurements with no knowledge of the issues you are complaining about. Learn the topic. Make specific remarks and we will be good. Don't just complain and expect a smile back.That's not really what I meant and you know it. So if we can lay off with the insults that'd be nice.
Yes my wife hates the look of speakers in our main "open plan" living space - it's very asymmetrical anyway with one side opening up to a conservatory and windows, so would be problematic anyway. But she would love these.People are this adverse to seeing speakers in their living room??
Insulting? That's on you.No, I don't know what you meant. All I know is that you made the insulting remark regarding usability of my measurements with no knowledge of the issues you are complaining about. Learn the topic. Make specific remarks and we will be good. Don't just complain and expect a smile back.