PristineSound
Major Contributor
- Thread Starter
- #41
You actually already answered the question on post 21 but Amir provided the scientific explanation. And after reading the simple and elegant explanation, I feel stupid because the science is obvious. But sometimes, obvious is what you miss.So what did you do? Sounds like what you're saying is that you have found a solution where at lower levels, you are not bothered by the room modes, which is nice. They're still there all the same.
I am not sure your question makes much more sense by adding "practical" to the sentence. The answer is still no. I for one still don't quite understand what you're asking for. You're at the same time saying you understand you can't get rid of room modes, but you are still asking how you can get rid of room modes. It would be helpful if you tried to elaborate or rephrase what you are trying to figure out.
The Internet does get a bit annoying when back and forth happens, so I'll just say this is the "practical" that I'm referring to but perhaps unsuccessfully articulate myself. By using speaker positioning and listening positioning, one can reduce the room modes such that in a practical scenario of listening, you have reduced the room mode to the point that it's not bothersome.
Now that Amir got me thinking, this also may imply that such positioning may result in a non equilateral triangle, possibly affecting imaging.