As a brand, I have to admit a love for the iconic company.
But as things stand now it appears the powers that be at D-M are attempting to push Marantz into the High End tier of current audiphool components.
Not quite as high as say the D'Agostino, Pass Labs stuff, but a acceptable alternative just below it, while Denon lives as a good blue-collar piece..
Time will tell.
It's a kind of "yes and no". That amp, if it delivers what it is supposed to, with the dealer support network and warranty, as a powerful integrated amplifier, is expensive: but I wouldn't necessarily call it "audiophool". I don't like the word but I do think the spirit of it would apply to the accompanying streamer and SACD player, based on the features and the likely prices. There is always going to be a price to pay for luxury features as well as for what we might expect (and may or may not get) in terms of long term support.
I see no reason for the copper lining business though, even though in that amp it looks pretty.
I do own and appreciate the previous "Reference" products and think they were only overpriced (I got a good discount of course, and they were actually available immediately during early covid). As they are also the only electronic products I've ever bought that my wife hasn't cursed, I'm happy. I won't be upgrading to or buying the new stuff.
What I don't like is that the cheaper Marantz stereo products seem to be hobbled in terms of noise unnecessarily, to make the expensive ones look better. No need for it, let the expensive stuff live on proper build quality and power.
As an "incidentally", I believe that Denon had some more expensive products than the last Marantz ones, but available only in Japan, at the time. So they shouldn't necessarily be let off lightly - and remember their 110 Anniversary products.