Razorhelm
Active Member
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2020
- Messages
- 160
- Likes
- 317
- Thread Starter
- #41
I agree that 200 watts per channel makes sense however my system is a little unorthodox, i have a software crossover running 6 DAC channels so i have 6 amps driving 6 drivers, i am confident i have enough power for the tweeter and woofer but the subwoofer is a 12-inch driver in a sealed enclosed and i have no idea of its sensitivity.
My system is documented here (https://www.audiosciencereview.com/...e-crossovers-via-rephase-and-camilladsp.19910)
The amp is a Harmon/Kardon avr 255 and its specs say 65 watts per channel into 8ohms but my subwoofers speakers are 4ohm so I should get more watts outs. I have also seen measurements of 90 watts per channel in a review.
With this wattage, I feel I'm right on the edge of what I need. I could just buy a new 6 channel amp with a much higher power spec but I don't want to if there is no need, which is why I wanted to find a test method-based approach to have confidence that what I have is sufficient.
My system is documented here (https://www.audiosciencereview.com/...e-crossovers-via-rephase-and-camilladsp.19910)
The amp is a Harmon/Kardon avr 255 and its specs say 65 watts per channel into 8ohms but my subwoofers speakers are 4ohm so I should get more watts outs. I have also seen measurements of 90 watts per channel in a review.
With this wattage, I feel I'm right on the edge of what I need. I could just buy a new 6 channel amp with a much higher power spec but I don't want to if there is no need, which is why I wanted to find a test method-based approach to have confidence that what I have is sufficient.
Last edited: