• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Is high-resolution audio audible or not audible and a waste of data?

Chaconne

Active Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2021
Messages
152
Likes
266
Honestly if you're worried about that kind of resolution, your speakers are probably the weak link by orders of magnitude.
Something I've always wondered about: Exactly how big is an order of magnitude?
 

fpitas

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jul 7, 2022
Messages
9,885
Likes
14,191
Location
Northern Virginia, USA
Something I've always wondered about: Exactly how big is an order of magnitude?
10x is the usual definition. Anymore it is used more loosely, especially when not in a scientific context.
 

antcollinet

Master Contributor
Joined
Sep 4, 2021
Messages
7,408
Likes
12,291
Location
UK/Cheshire
Yes, I had already seen this interesting video some time ago. But the theme here is slightly different: we are talking about the time spread of transients when switching from signals with a high sampling frequency to a lower one and the fact that our auditory system could detect this effect in the form of an alteration of the localization of the sources in the space.
If the sample rate doesn't "time spread" the transient down to a 20kHz bandwidth, then your ears will. Your ears are bandwidth limited also.
 
OP
Pinox67

Pinox67

Member
Editor
Joined
Apr 8, 2020
Messages
85
Likes
148
Location
Italy
If the sample rate doesn't "time spread" the transient down to a 20kHz bandwidth, then your ears will. Your ears are bandwidth limited also.

This is something that puzzled me too at first. The 20KHz bandwidth is related to the spectral analysis of the sound performed by the cochlea, to determine its "timbre". But for localization aspects, for which signal time arrival and differential time/or signal levels between ears (ITD and ILD) are important, this limit should be carefully managed. In modern psychoacoustic texts these mechanisms are well explained.
 
Last edited:

fpitas

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jul 7, 2022
Messages
9,885
Likes
14,191
Location
Northern Virginia, USA
So, everything gets filtered to a 20kHz BW by all the electronics and (especially) the speakers. But that 5uS sort of stuff still appears?
 

restorer-john

Grand Contributor
Joined
Mar 1, 2018
Messages
12,579
Likes
38,274
Location
Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
Oh brother. Not again. And especially after this week’s DAC, Measurement and Breakin audibility nonsense and fairytales.

Edit. And I forgot the all time favorite in yet another season of “the difference in power cables” featuring GR.

It's definitely the season for it. :)
 

danadam

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Jan 20, 2017
Messages
956
Likes
1,496
But for localization aspects, for which the differential analysis of arrival time and/or signal levels (ITD and ILD) counts, this limit does not apply.
And arrival time difference in stereo channels of 16/44 can be much less than 22 or even 5 µs.
 

Blumlein 88

Grand Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 23, 2016
Messages
20,521
Likes
37,050
And arrival time difference in stereo channels of 16/44 can be much less than 22 or even 5 µs.
Yes the ears aren't timing transients of 5 microseconds. They are timing arrival differences. CD can do that down to at lest 110 picoseconds. Here is the longer explanation of how that works.

 

valerianf

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Dec 15, 2019
Messages
691
Likes
442
Location
Los Angeles
"I listen to music in the car"
In my car I can clearly ear the difference between Sirius radio (flat sound stage) and a CD or better Amazon Music HD from my phone.
For sure I am speaking the when the car is idle in the traffic.
 

krabapple

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Apr 15, 2016
Messages
3,168
Likes
3,713
I don't know if anyone is capable of feeling such differences. I can't distinguish a 320 mp3 file from FLAC,
FLAC is just a lossless compression scheme. What you mean is you can't distinguish 320 mp3 (a type of lossy compression at a high quality setting) from lossless PCM (which could be any of these file types: WAV, AIFF, FLAC, MLP...)
 

Blumlein 88

Grand Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 23, 2016
Messages
20,521
Likes
37,050
"I listen to music in the car"
In my car I can clearly ear the difference between Sirius radio (flat sound stage) and a CD or better Amazon Music HD from my phone.
For sure I am speaking the when the car is idle in the traffic.
Ewwww! Sirius radio hurts my ears. I forget, but it is some very low bit rate early codec. 64 kbps.
 

dorakeg

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2022
Messages
326
Likes
187
Regarding this, I have to say I don't know. I don't think its possible to tell by looking at such a short sample. In a real world scenario, the amplitude and frequency is changing all the time.

A thought experiment. Assume 2 identical albums, 1 in high resolution (say 24/192), the other in 16/44. Then we down sample the high resolution to 16/44, will we get identical data? Probably not exactly the same. Then we need to compare where are the differences and when we convert the bits into analogue wave, whats the differences? I dont expect big difference but I am not sure if some of the differences are audible or not.

Even after knowing the differences, we still have to test if an audio equipment will be able to reproduce the differences at audible volume. This is what I am thinking. For albums that have rapid and frequent changes in volume/frequency (perhaps an orchestra playing), I believe its possible to have difference. But for slow pieces like JAzz, solo instruments, probably not.
 

blueone

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
May 11, 2019
Messages
1,179
Likes
1,494
Location
USA
We have SXM in all three of our vehicles, because my wife likes it. I haven't noticed SXM audio quality is any worse than FM radio, but all of our vehicles have such noisy tires that the differences between SXM and lossless streaming from Amazon Music is pretty much undetectable to me. One of our vehicles has an over-priced B&O audio system in it, and even with that I can't get excited about differences. To paraphrase a line from an old movie, when I drive, I drive. When I listen to music, I listen to music. Music while driving is difficult for me to get excited over.
 

Blumlein 88

Grand Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 23, 2016
Messages
20,521
Likes
37,050
Regarding this, I have to say I don't know. I don't think its possible to tell by looking at such a short sample. In a real world scenario, the amplitude and frequency is changing all the time.

A thought experiment. Assume 2 identical albums, 1 in high resolution (say 24/192), the other in 16/44. Then we down sample the high resolution to 16/44, will we get identical data? Probably not exactly the same. Then we need to compare where are the differences and when we convert the bits into analogue wave, whats the differences? I dont expect big difference but I am not sure if some of the differences are audible or not.

Even after knowing the differences, we still have to test if an audio equipment will be able to reproduce the differences at audible volume. This is what I am thinking. For albums that have rapid and frequent changes in volume/frequency (perhaps an orchestra playing), I believe its possible to have difference. But for slow pieces like JAzz, solo instruments, probably not.
Download samples from 2L as they have multiple resolutions of entire demo tracks. Then use Deltawave that pkane wrote. It will upsample to match and compare the nulling of two files with different sample rates. Oops looks like 2L has removed their free sample download in a website upgrade.

Of course I can tell you that you are barking up the wrong tree. Does not seem to matter how many times it is demonstrated, people just want to believe more rez is better.
 

Mr. Widget

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Oct 11, 2022
Messages
1,146
Likes
1,697
Location
SF Bay Area
I've got shocking news for OP...even on "highy resolving boutique audiophile gear" you're going to have a REAL hard time in a blind test distinguishing high res from a 320kb mp3 (I'd be willing to bet nearly impossible actually). CD quality is more than enough resolution.
I have one of those systems... I'm on the fence about the higher res mp3s, but I certainly can't hear a difference between 16 bit 44.1KHz and any of the various higher resolutions.

On a related note: I'm not sure what algorithm Harman is using with their Clari-Fi circuit, but it tends to make many mp3s sound better and makes most CD or better files sound odd.
 

dorakeg

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2022
Messages
326
Likes
187
Download samples from 2L as they have multiple resolutions of entire demo tracks. Then use Deltawave that pkane wrote. It will upsample to match and compare the nulling of two files with different sample rates. Oops looks like 2L has removed their free sample download in a website upgrade.

Of course I can tell you that you are barking up the wrong tree. Does not seem to matter how many times it is demonstrated, people just want to believe more rez is better.

Haha, true. People will want to believe that higher resolution is better....

But then, even if higher resolution is indeed better, the important thing is still the source. Eg. for 4K movies. Not even movie on blu ray is native 4K. Quite alot are actually upscaled from 2K. In such cases, there isn't going to be much improvement. I saw another thread that some of the old recordings are remastered into high resolution audio. For such cases, I doubt its going to improve anything.

IMHO, if the information isn't there in the first place, using higher resolution and increase sampling rate isn't going to reveal anything.
 

Talisman

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Mar 27, 2022
Messages
897
Likes
2,546
Location
Milano Italy
FLAC is just a lossless compression scheme. What you mean is you can't distinguish 320 mp3 (a type of lossy compression at a high quality setting) from lossless PCM (which could be any of these file types: WAV, AIFF, FLAC, MLP...)
If that's why mp3 is also one of the many audio compression protocols, I simply gave an example between the two most used protocols of lossy and lossless audio (which are the ones I use)
 
Top Bottom