• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Is Digital Audio Transmission Analog? [video]

DonR

Major Contributor
Joined
Jan 25, 2022
Messages
2,971
Likes
5,615
Location
Vancouver(ish)
Just a silly question: is this thread now about how ultrasonic noise on an Ethernet connection may impact music payload bit integrity and hence sound quality?
I think it is more about RF noise coupling and demodulating to the analog stage but who knows?
 

KSTR

Major Contributor
Joined
Sep 6, 2018
Messages
2,690
Likes
6,013
Location
Berlin, Germany
Just a silly question: is this thread now about how ultrasonic noise on an Ethernet connection may impact music payload bit integrity and hence sound quality?
No, its about the effect of RF noise directly induced into the analog sections of a DAC. We silently always assume bit perfect data and this can be easily monitored if in doubt.

While this kind of disturbance should not happen with competent circuit design and layout, it does happen in practise. Same goes for direct GND voltage drop errors inside a DAC, a very related issue, 8kHz "USB packet noise being" one commonly observed effect. Unless these disturbances create actual malfunction or readily audible noise a device having these problems may still pass EMC tests with regard to robustness.

How relevant could these effects become in actual listening practise? As of yet, I'd say we simply don't know because there has not been a thorough investigation as of yet, to my knowledge.
 

DonDish

Active Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2022
Messages
205
Likes
161
Location
Scandinavian peninsula
The usual blubbety blubbery. I like Hans, when he stick to the facts! When he wonders about he is not so smart
 

pablolie

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jul 8, 2021
Messages
2,025
Likes
3,327
Location
bay area, ca
So now Hans is suggesting that network switches can introduce jitter. In the intro he talks about how one audiophile switch sounds better than another. Ugh.

...

Of course network equipment can introduce jitter and latency, and if poorly planned even packet loss. Completely irrelevant with something as low bitrate as audio, no matter how HD you want to get - worry about that when you support high volume real time trading, where 10ms can mean several million bucks lost, easily. :-D [1]

BTW there's a reason why buffering exists. It corrects jitter if it's relevant to the application. Another thing about jitter: the dumber your network device is -ie. the less queueing/buffering- the less jitter you'll have as a rule. Price to pay: potential packet loss at high utilization.

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS AN AUDIOPHILE NETWORK SWITCH/ROUTER. Period.

[1] I work for one of the top high-end networking companies in the world. Friendly provider of mega-Terabit routers etc. The deals with financial, government or healthcare institutions call for immense penalties if something goes wrong. You'd think those audiophool network comanies would try to enter such very profitable and large markets... note they don't - and never will. They'd end up bellyup like goldfish in boiling water in a sec... and know it.
 
Last edited:

Vacceo

Major Contributor
Joined
Mar 9, 2022
Messages
2,635
Likes
2,753
Of course network equipment can introduce jitter and latency, and if poorly planned even packet loss. Completely irrelevant with something as low bitrate as audio, no matter how HD you want to get - worry about that when you support high volume real time trading, where 10ms can mean several million bucks lost, easily. :-D

BTW there's a reason why buffering exists. It corrects jitter if it's relevant to the application. Another thing about jitter: the dumber your network device is -ie. the less queueing/buffering- the less jitter you'll have as a rule. Price to pay: potential packet loss at high utilization.

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS AN AUDIOPHILE NETWORK SWITCH/ROUTER. Period.
So in essence, they are functionally the same as electricity wires for audio gear: they work or they do not.
 

pablolie

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jul 8, 2021
Messages
2,025
Likes
3,327
Location
bay area, ca
So in essence, they are functionally the same as electricity wires for audio gear: they work or they do not.
Exactly. Except with good network gear you get the managment tools to establish traffic trends and act on stuff before it bites you in the derriere. You get all the stats: latencies and jitter and packet loss, warnings with exact pointers to the location etc etc.

A well designed network doesn't suddenly fail if you truly examine what lead to it. If you look at the famous big network outages, it's human error >95% of the time. When hardare fails it's trivial - people have a response plan and spares in place. When software fails, it can go from trivial to being a nightmare that keeps you up at night until it's fixed. If it's user error, it takes very careful case management to not discredit your best customers in front of their bosses.... :)
 
Last edited:

antcollinet

Master Contributor
Joined
Sep 4, 2021
Messages
7,409
Likes
12,294
Location
UK/Cheshire
Of course network equipment can introduce jitter and latency, and if poorly planned even packet loss. Completely irrelevant with something as low bitrate as audio, no matter how HD you want to get - worry about that when you support high volume real time trading, where 10ms can mean several million bucks lost, easily. :-D [1]

BTW there's a reason why buffering exists. It corrects jitter if it's relevant to the application. Another thing about jitter: the dumber your network device is -ie. the less queueing/buffering- the less jitter you'll have as a rule. Price to pay: potential packet loss at high utilization.

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS AN AUDIOPHILE NETWORK SWITCH/ROUTER. Period.

[1] I work for one of the top high-end networking companies in the world. Friendly provider of mega-Terabit routers etc. The deals with financial, government or healthcare institutions call for immense penalties if something goes wrong. You'd think those audiophool network comanies would try to enter such very profitable and large markets... note they don't - and never will. They'd end up bellyup like goldfish in boiling water in a sec... and know it.
Jitter (as it applies to audio) only has any effect at the point where digital samples are converted to analogue.

Jitter (such as it exists) in any digitial to digital device has no impact at all, unless it is so severe that it causes data to be corrupted. And then in an ethernet domain, you'd sort of hope error detection and retransmission would eliminate that as a problem.
 

redstang

Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2021
Messages
70
Likes
43
Location
Minnesota
Of course network equipment can introduce jitter and latency

How can it introduce jitter if the clocking is all done by the DAC? The DAC either has the packet to assemble into the bitstream (which I assume is buffered) or it doesn't.
 

pablolie

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jul 8, 2021
Messages
2,025
Likes
3,327
Location
bay area, ca
Jitter (as it applies to audio) only has any effect at the point where digital samples are converted to analogue.
Bingo.The only problem with jitter is when the receiving codec is "starved" ie doesn't receive the next packet in time. Buffers eliminate that possibility to zero if well designed for the application.
Jitter (such as it exists) in any digitial to digital device has no impact at all, unless it is so severe that it causes data to be corrupted. And then in an ethernet domain, you'd sort of hope error detection and retransmission would eliminate that as a problem.
Not just Ethernet - *any* network... routing (IP) or switching (Ethernet)... and actually data corruption that isn't corrected is *extremely* seldom, cosmic ray stuff. I mentioned this before, but in my venerable 30+ year networking career I just have *heard* about undetected data corruption through the network (it does happen in static storage though, but they have methods to address that). I have never once experienced it. Packet loss is another matter altogether - that happens, for a variety of reasons. And like you said, retransmission is there.
 

pablolie

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jul 8, 2021
Messages
2,025
Likes
3,327
Location
bay area, ca
How can it introduce jitter if the clocking is all done by the DAC? The DAC either has the packet to assemble into the bitstream (which I assume is buffered) or it doesn't.
The DAC clocking is entirely internal to the end device. The end device has a network layer that receives the data without being impacted by *network* jitter (if the designer passed a basic test or two in DAC design). That's why you have a buffer stage *between* the network layer and the application layer (which is what the DAC is).

The OSI model is not entirely accurate in the current world, but it stll represents the design concerns of the different domain responsibilities that need to be in an end-to-end system to perfection. Separation of duties with a layered model is *vital* to any working design.
 

Ken Tajalli

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Sep 8, 2021
Messages
1,995
Likes
1,773
Location
London UK
Just little common-sense observations:
How many switches, servers, b;ah blah does streaming music go through, before it gets me?
I mean, on something like Qubuz or Amazon HD?
I still manage to get the data in bit-perfect condition, despite all that, don't I?
How much of a difference does one switch, or router at my house, can make?

Edit:
BTW, I am going to blame bad switches and serveres for all my past and future spelling missstakes. :cool:
 
Last edited:

Laotze

Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2023
Messages
19
Likes
27
I think that all analog audio is actually digital!

Only a discrete number of electrons jump across the bandgap of whatever amplification device.

Therefore it's all digital.
/Tongue out of cheek
 
OP
amirm

amirm

Founder/Admin
Staff Member
CFO (Chief Fun Officer)
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Messages
44,368
Likes
234,394
Location
Seattle Area
So now Hans is suggesting that network switches can introduce jitter. In the intro he talks about how one audiophile switch sounds better than another. Ugh.

Shame that he spends so much time on stuff that doesn't matter, and so little on what does. It is only towards the end that he claims jitter on Ethernet magically jumps to jitter in a DAC. Where are the pretty graphs to show that let alone measurements?

Fortunately, we have those measurements. :) I tested EtherRegen which he says is better than any commercial IT switch: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/.../uptone-audio-etherregen-switch-review.10232/

Here is the jitter test using it, or generic switch:

index.php


There is absolutely no difference in jitter. Same is true above audio band:

index.php


There are more tests there that prove beyond any doubt that the network switch makes no difference whatsoever.

Please link to my EtherRegen review to his youtube and see if he a) leaves it there and b) what he has to say. As far as I know, he deletes such comments so clearly he is not interested in learning as he says in his video.

Bottom line, a bit of knowledge here is dangerous. Yes, jitter is like what he says. But no, it has no merit in this discussion since the two components of the system run asynchronous from each other and are separated by many moats. He would have known this if he had measured. But he didn't despite the equipment sitting behind him which is capable of such.

As to what he has heard, that is obviously done sighted and without controls. So he might as well say the color of the switch changes the sound!
 
OP
amirm

amirm

Founder/Admin
Staff Member
CFO (Chief Fun Officer)
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Messages
44,368
Likes
234,394
Location
Seattle Area
As an aside, measuring jitter directly from say a clock requires high-end measurement gear. However, measuring it using FFT spectrum as I show above, is trivial. We are able to use signal processing to significantly reduce measurement noise and then be able to measure jitter down to sub picoseconds (well below resolution of 24 bit audio). So his implication that jitter can't be measured is wrong. It is done in every measurement I make of DACs as you all know.
 

Laotze

Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2023
Messages
19
Likes
27
As an aside, measuring jitter directly from say a clock requires high-end measurement gear. However, measuring it using FFT spectrum as I show above, is trivial. We are able to use signal processing to significantly reduce measurement noise and then be able to measure jitter down to sub picoseconds (well below resolution of 24 bit audio). So his implication that jitter can't be measured is wrong. It is done in every measurement I make of DACs as you all know.
Maybe they are right about you damaging your hearing Amir. I mean, you can't hear femtosecond delays like the self proclaimed golden ears obviously can.

Personally, I switched to the old horned record players. Since the jitter of the (lossy digital) electrons sounds grating to me.
 

redstang

Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2021
Messages
70
Likes
43
Location
Minnesota
Shame that he spends so much time on stuff that doesn't matter, and so little on what does. It is only towards the end that he claims jitter on Ethernet magically jumps to jitter in a DAC. Where are the pretty graphs to show that let alone measurements?

Fortunately, we have those measurements. :) I tested EtherRegen which he says is better than any commercial IT switch: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/.../uptone-audio-etherregen-switch-review.10232/

Here is the jitter test using it, or generic switch:

index.php


There is absolutely no difference in jitter. Same is true above audio band:

index.php


There are more tests there that prove beyond any doubt that the network switch makes no difference whatsoever.

Please link to my EtherRegen review to his youtube and see if he a) leaves it there and b) what he has to say. As far as I know, he deletes such comments so clearly he is not interested in learning as he says in his video.

Bottom line, a bit of knowledge here is dangerous. Yes, jitter is like what he says. But no, it has no merit in this discussion since the two components of the system run asynchronous from each other and are separated by many moats. He would have known this if he had measured. But he didn't despite the equipment sitting behind him which is capable of such.

As to what he has heard, that is obviously done sighted and without controls. So he might as well say the color of the switch changes the sound!
I have to think he is deleting any negative comments or even anything that refute his claims because all the comments on there now are 100% positive.
 
Top Bottom