Stacked 60 images. Bit tedious manually rolling the microscope stage. Worked better than I thought it would.Is this one frame or a stacking?
Last edited:
Stacked 60 images. Bit tedious manually rolling the microscope stage. Worked better than I thought it would.Is this one frame or a stacking?
I'm shocked by the number 60. Do you know the lens parameters?Stacked 60 images. Bit tedious manually rolling the microphone stage. Worked better than I thought it would.
it was given up to 1.5gr...so in fact it could be really interesting to pass the 1.2-1.4gr for example..Bang & Olufsen (B&O) SP-12
Click to increase size
View attachment 329518View attachment 329519
View attachment 329515View attachment 329514
View attachment 329516View attachment 329517View attachment 329520
View attachment 329521View attachment 329522View attachment 329523
Notes
- NOS, nude elliptical stylus
- They advertised this as a "Micro-Cross mount"
- High compliance cartridge
- I always wanted one of these because of the design
- It looks its best with the Beogram decks it was designed for
- I wonder if the resonance would be better kept in check on the appropriate tonearm
- Still, it was pushed up so as to not affect audible range
- I will be revisiting this cartridge with an increased tracking force and adjusted damping
- Simply to double check given age and for sound comparison sample
Playing outdoors?temperature sensitive and sounds dull at this time of year.
I'm shocked by the number 60. Do you know the lens parameters?
Not especially - this generation needed 72F which they got in the large format parallel tracking models with internal power supplies and lids down. Lower than that and the hf drops. I can't speak for the MMC1 - 5 models, but the previous larger MMC's were all affected to a degree.Playing outdoors?
Bang & Olufsen (B&O) SP-12
Click to increase size
View attachment 329518View attachment 329519
View attachment 329515View attachment 329514
View attachment 329516View attachment 329517View attachment 329520
View attachment 329521View attachment 329522View attachment 329523
Notes
- NOS, nude elliptical stylus
- They advertised this as a "Micro-Cross mount"
- High compliance cartridge
- I always wanted one of these because of the design
- It looks its best with the Beogram decks it was designed for
- I wonder if the resonance would be better kept in check on the appropriate tonearm
- Still, it was pushed up so as to not affect audible range
- I will be revisiting this cartridge with an increased tracking force and adjusted damping
- Simply to double check given age and for sound comparison sample
It is a High Output moving coil design, its inductance would be negligible compared to your typical MM, as a result the LCR EQ is also negligible -what you get is the raw performance of the cantilever/needle.Ortofon MC-3 Turbo broken cantilever restored.
View attachment 329186View attachment 329187View attachment 329188
View attachment 329189View attachment 329190View attachment 329191View attachment 329192View attachment 329193
Thank you, can you take a few photos of what the lens looks like, what the backlight unit looks like?There's no micrometer adjustment for Z so it's a guess. First try was 20 images of just the interesting bit of the stylus, and that didn't turn out great. This was the second attempt. Objective is 10x/0.25 with a 10-20x zoom eyepiece. I turned an adapter to fit a cheap USB scope/camera in front of the eyepiece to capture images.
View attachment 329572
I also wanted the cantilever to be shorter.It is a High Output moving coil design, its inductance would be negligible compared to your typical MM, as a result the LCR EQ is also negligible -what you get is the raw performance of the cantilever/needle.
The rise and peak around 15 to 16kHz is the cantilever resonance - and provides an indication of effective tip mass. (I have the necessary formulae somewhere to calculate tip mass from the resonance frequency.... but would need to dig it up...)
It's a lovely high quality rock on the end there... but, if only that cantilever was lighter!
Not in the pauper UK you don't unless you're seen to be wasteful with shedloads of money to burn. Mid to upper 60's here (18 - 19 Celsius) most of the day and evening and we make up for it with wearing extra layers...@DSJR , 72-73F is quite common room temperature that will suit many I would think. Maybe saving energy by letting temperature dropping below that indoors ? Else it should be easy to maintain stable 72F with a thermostat during winter months, and now indoor temperatures can be controlled and scheduled by a phone app ( for electric heating at least, with gas I do not know) . I saved 25 %of the energy cost by using “night saving “ temperature scheduling. Still I have 72F when I am home in the sofa listening.