The 1.3 kHz peak looks like it is helping to fill in a dip in the woofer's response. It doesn't look to be negatively affecting the directivity index too much. The question is whether it is generating high THD. If not, I think it looks quite nice. Good job on the crossover design!it has a distortion peak around 1.3 kHz.
Directivity and Power Response look really good. Shame about that distortion. Is it really audible at -18db? Seems like just too low to overcome the woofer contribution.
The 1.3 kHz peak looks like it is helping to fill in a dip in the woofer's response. It doesn't look to be negatively affecting the directivity index too much. The question is whether it is generating high THD. If not, I think it looks quite nice. Good job on the crossover design!
Speaking of DXT-Mon, have you seen these tweeter tests, some with adapted waveguides?Thanks! For the price, the tweeter is still a good value. The woofer is too at OEM pricing. Audibility may be moot and for the C-Note looks like it was buried in the woofer resonance. My distortion measurements are not ideal and so will take another pass under more controlled conditions. Do not like that it occurs in key midrange but might be a reasonable compromise for some.
I realized that the using the DXT would very closely resemble the DXT-Mon and want something more unique. There is a Wavecor tweeter that seems a better match and so will likely try it. Then Denotiva perhaps becomes Wavenotiva?![]()
Speaking of DXT-Mon, have you seen these tweeter tests, some with adapted waveguides?
https://heissmann-acoustics.de/treibertests/
You misunderstood me, I was talking about all the normal tweeter tests, as there are also cheaper ones.Thanks, but while interesting, this effort is focused on off-the-shelf drivers.
As with Directiva, want to make this easy to build for even the layman. DIY hobbyists can always take it another direction with mods, but is not my focus here.
You misunderstood me, I was talking about all the normal tweeter tests, as there are also cheaper ones.
The thing about the adapted waveguides was just an additional hint.
With the WF182 and passive radiator involved, adding the DXT would line up with Heissmann's DXT-Mon-182 more so than the original DXT-Mon.I realized that the using the DXT would very closely resemble the DXT-Mon and want something more unique.
With the WF182 and passive radiator involved, adding the DXT would line up with Heissmann's DXT-Mon-182 more so than the original DXT-Mon.
Personally I wouldn't object to a "free" design of the DXT-Mon-182 that used the WF182BD10 8 ohm version, which seems more widely available than the 4 ohm WF182DB09 version that Heissman specs.
FWIW, Heissmann claims an F3 of ~ 36Hz in an 18L cabinet w/ the affordable Dayton DSA-215PR.
Using the same drivers but designing a different crossover is not duplicating someone's design nor unethical in any way. Buying his design and then publishing his exact crossover would be unethical.Why not let that lay down..? Heissman has been generous with the DIY community, with nice stuff for free on his site, duplicating one of is designs, that he developed for (little) profit doesn't seem ethical to me.
Why not let that lay down..?Heissman has been generous with the DIY community, with nice stuff for free on his site, duplicating one of is designs, that he developed for (little) profit doesn't seem ethical to me.
I tend to agree with e4audio on this one.Using the same drivers but designing a different crossover is not duplicating someone's design nor unethical in any way. Buying his design and then publishing his exact crossover would be unethical.
Why not let that lay down..?Heissman has been generous with the DIY community, with nice stuff for free on his site, duplicating one of is designs, that he developed for (little) profit doesn't seem ethical to me.