Pugsly
Member
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2021
- Messages
- 98
- Likes
- 122
Hey All,
Early this morning (gotta love insomnia) I ran across the following interview with John Seaber of JDS Labs:
Some key points of interest:
(1) Amplifiers and DACS have reached the point where the advances in measurements are far beyond what is audible
(2) In particular, J.S. cites the fact that the new Atom+ measures better than the old Atom, but no one could hear it - indeed, they were shipping the new version for a month before announcing it, and just giving ppl the updated version
(3) J.S. is committed to being honest and giving them real, meaningful improvements, but at this point there is no further advancement to be made in that direction
(4) because of this J.S. says that in the future they will not continue to chase measurements. He was (understandably) cagey about what they do have in the works and plan to do instead... but any suspicions or hopes?
(5) Maybe it is just me, but I feel like J.S. was doing his best to be polite and avoid telling the interviewer that the claim that he could hear substantial differences between the Element II and Atom stack with his very expensive new headphones are highly implausible... and instead deflected/ignored the claim and insisted that the E2 is 'better' in terms of premium materials, looks, feel, etc.
I found 4 quite interesting, particularly as with the recent crop of Topping, etc. offerings that are also measurably transparent, cheap, and include more features (e.g. bluetooth) there is certainly a danger, I would suspect, that their market share will start get cannibalized by the increasingly inexpensive and ever more superlatively measuring Chinese gear. So what direction can they go in?
(a) start adding more features such as bluetooth, etc (but then wouldn't they be following the Chinese hifi market instead of innovating and end up in the same place?)
(b) branch out from headphone amplifiers into other electronics such as speaker amplifiers? Or headphones? Or speakers?
(c) start working on/including dsp functions? So 'the JDS Subjective' on steroids?
(d) design equipment that will emulate other kinds of 'less perfectly' measuring gear (in the direction of Solderdude's Project Polaris)?
C strikes me as the most plausible and exciting options for an honest EE who expresses some personal appreciation in this interview for, e.g., some 'subjective' things like bass boosting subs, etc.
At any rate, I hope you all enjoy. I really liked John after listening to the interview, and was amazed by his commitment to giving the straight goods even when going along with the interviewer would have been both easy (say by saying that the EL2 is more powerful and maybe that was the difference) and financial advantageous!
Pugs
Early this morning (gotta love insomnia) I ran across the following interview with John Seaber of JDS Labs:
Conversations With: John Seaber of JDS Labs
Listen to this episode from The Curiosity Project on Spotify. Brew a cup and join Omar and John for a chat! For those who are veteran listeners of the show, you will be familiar with JDS Labs, Omar uses their equipment to test almost all headphones and earphones that we talk about but in todays...
open.spotify.com
Some key points of interest:
(1) Amplifiers and DACS have reached the point where the advances in measurements are far beyond what is audible
(2) In particular, J.S. cites the fact that the new Atom+ measures better than the old Atom, but no one could hear it - indeed, they were shipping the new version for a month before announcing it, and just giving ppl the updated version
(3) J.S. is committed to being honest and giving them real, meaningful improvements, but at this point there is no further advancement to be made in that direction
(4) because of this J.S. says that in the future they will not continue to chase measurements. He was (understandably) cagey about what they do have in the works and plan to do instead... but any suspicions or hopes?
(5) Maybe it is just me, but I feel like J.S. was doing his best to be polite and avoid telling the interviewer that the claim that he could hear substantial differences between the Element II and Atom stack with his very expensive new headphones are highly implausible... and instead deflected/ignored the claim and insisted that the E2 is 'better' in terms of premium materials, looks, feel, etc.
I found 4 quite interesting, particularly as with the recent crop of Topping, etc. offerings that are also measurably transparent, cheap, and include more features (e.g. bluetooth) there is certainly a danger, I would suspect, that their market share will start get cannibalized by the increasingly inexpensive and ever more superlatively measuring Chinese gear. So what direction can they go in?
(a) start adding more features such as bluetooth, etc (but then wouldn't they be following the Chinese hifi market instead of innovating and end up in the same place?)
(b) branch out from headphone amplifiers into other electronics such as speaker amplifiers? Or headphones? Or speakers?
(c) start working on/including dsp functions? So 'the JDS Subjective' on steroids?
(d) design equipment that will emulate other kinds of 'less perfectly' measuring gear (in the direction of Solderdude's Project Polaris)?
C strikes me as the most plausible and exciting options for an honest EE who expresses some personal appreciation in this interview for, e.g., some 'subjective' things like bass boosting subs, etc.
At any rate, I hope you all enjoy. I really liked John after listening to the interview, and was amazed by his commitment to giving the straight goods even when going along with the interviewer would have been both easy (say by saying that the EL2 is more powerful and maybe that was the difference) and financial advantageous!
Pugs
Last edited: