• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Interesting admission from Steven Wilson

TLDR: duh ...
Some interesting snippets, and good to see this in writing. Mentions, and glosses over that CD quality is already beyond normal human hearing limits even before age related hearing degradation sets in.
Ends with a view that Atmos will grow in popularity (nothing to do with high res)
 
I do not like how he uses words like "Clarity" and "Detail" when describing CD or "Higher res" recordings.

It either captures the signal fully or does not.
I mean if no one can audibly tell them apart, I would say that it captures it well enough in reality.

I know over at the S.H. "Temple" many make huge arse claims, and then belittle anyone that questions them.....lol
 
I do not like how he uses words like "Clarity" and "Detail" when describing CD or "Higher res" recordings.

It either captures the signal fully or does not.
I mean if no one can audibly tell them apart, I would say that it captures it well enough in reality.

I know over at the S.H. "Temple" many make huge arse claims, and then belittle anyone that questions them.....lol
SH himself thinks he can hear differences between DACs. I started a thread on there about it once and it was a never ending debate.
 
The problem with CD is not 16/44 limit, but permanent loudness war.

I believe, that Atmos could be a cure, if the format include reference level and required headroom. I don't konow details, but average volume of Atmos albums is like 12-18dB less than CD.
 
Back
Top Bottom