Bren Derlin
Active Member
That's great. Where does the program material from the center go?
It’s split into stereo, like music with great imaging. It doesn’t magically disappear.
That's great. Where does the program material from the center go?
I don't understand. How does one route dedicated center channel content into 2 channels? Downmixing from 5.1? Can an AVR do this?It’s split into stereo, like music with great imaging. It doesn’t magically disappear.
Does anyone who says they prefer a phantom center have identical speakers in all 3 positions? I suspect that's really the issue - a subpar, not timbre matched, center
It’s magic….Yes. The receiver does the work for you.I don't understand. How does one route dedicated center channel content into 2 channels? Downmixing from 5.1? Can an AVR do this?
At this point I assume you're trolling.It’s magic….Yes. The receiver does the work for you.![]()
Um. No. The receiver figures out how it’s going to split the center channel audio between the LR speakers.At this point I assume you're trolling.
I’m listening to movies in a 4.1 rig (two fronts, to surrounds, and a sub). No center channel.We're totally OT but you're listening to 2 ch PCM movie content playing through L/R and a sub? No upmixing? In "stereo"?
I'm saying a lot of dedicated centers are awful. Anything mtm is definitely awful. Comb filtering is a fundamental problem that center speakers solve, if they don't introduce other issues.Are you saying Polk, Revel, Elac, KEF, Focal, Sonus Fabre, Et Al are fibbing when they say their family matched centers are timbre matched?
I had the LSi15 towers and the LSiC, which, when you flipped vertically, matched the top third of the LSi15. …just had no room to flip it vertically, much less add a third LSi15 below the TV.
I wonder, if people who don’t like a phantom center, sit too far away from their front channel speakers, and outside of “the triangle”, and/or have their speakers buried in the corners of their space, and just don’t get that beautiful holographic stereo imaging from the front L/R speakers.![]()
In 2 channel PCM?I’m listening to movies in a 4.1 rig (two fronts, to surrounds, and a sub). No center channel.
2ch pcm via PLII or DSUR, to 4.1 sounds reasonable to me...In 2 channel PCM?
But what happens to center content? I suppose it's not dedicated center content if it's upmixed?2ch pcm via PLII or DSUR, to 4.1 sounds reasonable to me...
If you set up an AVR with no center channel, it will map 5.1 sound to 4.1 speakers; mixing the center channel to the front two channels on the fly.But what happens to center content? I suppose it's not dedicated center content if it's upmixed?
Ah. I forgot that-I believe I used that method early in my audio adventure. Thanks for the clarification.If you set up an AVR with no center channel, it will map 5.1 sound to 4.1 speakers; mixing the center channel to the front two channels on the fly.
Phantom CenterBut what happens to center content? I suppose it's not dedicated center content if it's upmixed?
It's called a tangent. It's ok. These things happen on messageboards.With respect, what are these center channel talks have to do with the new Integra?
I hope too, but I'm afraid that the "cheap prepro" market segment has disappeared and ATM prepros are just offered at ultra-highend price tags.I too waiting for a new substitute of my Onkyo PR-RZ5100. I tink, and hope, that Onkyo will come back, after about 6 years, with a new surprising prepro. If Onkyo wants to return great and competitive on prepros market, then he must to made something of valid. This DRX-8.4 with Dirac Live is a good news for the future.