Even I'm speechless.
Even I'm speechless.
To solve your MIT cable pricing dilemma, just special order a longer set than you need. Every additional millimeter improves the sound. Or, maybe just have them wrapped in a custom color cotton sleeve. Maybe authentic Ferarri red or something. Or, do like Manafort and get them in Python skin. That should put you over the magic $100k mark.You got it..
On top of the products I looove to hate
The ... WAVAC !!! It was $350,000 in 2004!! I shudder to know what it would cost today, 14 years later, perhaps > $500K .. Prices do not go down in High End Audio, they only increase. This thing is the epitome of Low Fidelity to the signal but is highly musical ... whatever that means to you plebeian objectivists ... (Actually if you were to ask us, subjectivists what that means you would get a very different answer from every respondent.
The Link to John Atkinson measurements (Click here)
Since we are dealing with the absurd, here is another link ... I like the Nordost Fiber Optics cable a lot ...
Click HERE The link is a little behind the times for speaker cables but I believe the fiber optic cables form Nordost is still the king of fiber optic cables ... I think they should use that particular brand of fiber for Transcontinental Internet connection. Those slow undersea cables in use today are no match for it... Only problem would have been the cost $33,000 for 2 meters! NY _london is 5,585,000 meters but hey!! Jeff Bezos could pay for it to allow Amazon customers to have a better Internet Experience
I am also looking for a $100K speaker cable .. The MIT ACC 268 at $80,000 (No TYPO, Click here), comes close but I need $100K models to bring my speakers/system to the next level: Blacker background, stadium-sized soundstage, more extension in the highs ... Magic elimination of room nodes and other objectivist fixations such as rooms peaks or even the arcane Allison effect. True the MIT with its many poles of Articulation is only $80K (By the way the value of the poles can be calculated since those are poles of something mathematical, equation perhaps.. and it is from MIT ) perhaps a few additional meters woud bring it to the magical threshold of $100K but I am partial to short speaker cable and long interconnects ....
Really? The discrepancy would drive me crazy.Not sure about decals but I'd probably fall for just sticking a VU meter that moved around without actually being connected to anything!
Used a lot of that back in the day for a custom colored anodized braided oil line look on motorcycles.You can wrap any cable in Techflex quite affordably. They also have the good heatshrink.
https://www.techflex.com/general-purpose/flexo-remix?part=PTM0.50FI
Do you think that getting the Topping DX7 is aiming high?
Frantz, what is Topping DX7?
Edging closer to the $1,000,000 ticket:
https://www.higherfi.com/phono/av-design-haus-dereneville-vpm
Its designer is a very nice guy, very respectful and always very polite, a true gentleman; Rainer Horstmann.
• http://www.dj-rooms.com/avdesignhaus-dereneville-vpm2010/
But that turntable is unique, if you want one you have to order it and probably wait few weeks, months, ...
I would never have my pure pristine analogue corrupted by the mere presence of digital in the same chassis. I mean! having a lot of digital stuff, right Inside my TT? If the scanner, HDTV camera and control were all analog then and only then would I consider this TT. don’t mind the result product to cost much more.Its designer is a very nice guy, very respectful and always very polite, a true gentleman; Rainer Horstmann.
• http://www.dj-rooms.com/avdesignhaus-dereneville-vpm2010/
But that turntable is unique, if you want one you have to order it and probably wait few weeks, months, ...
Might be a nice person and lots of bits there for the money but IME the arm in 4 rods is a catastrophe of added resonance and it looks like the pivot isn't at the same height as the stylus (sadly common) and the drive system uses what is generally considered poor practice amongst engineers.Its designer is a very nice guy, very respectful and always very polite, a true gentleman; Rainer Horstmann.
• http://www.dj-rooms.com/avdesignhaus-dereneville-vpm2010/
But that turntable is unique, if you want one you have to order it and probably wait few weeks, months, ...
There was a time when Linn and others insisted that even having a CD player in the same room, connected or not, negatively affected the sound from your TT.I would never have my pure pristine analogue corrupted by the mere presence of digital in the same chassis. I mean! having a lot of digital stuff, right Inside my TT? If the scanner, HDTV camera and control were all analog then and only then would I consider this TT. don’t mind the result product to cost much more.
Rube Goldberg would have had a field day with this TT.
Does anyone, I mean just one person, ever bought one?
He is. His earlier prototypes were much more beautiful than this one.Its designer is a very nice guy, very respectful and always very polite, a true gentleman; Rainer Horstmann.
He will nicely charge so much?
Compare R&D and manufacturing costs for these products: http://www.businessinsider.com.au/t...4?r=US&IR=T#10-saleen-s7-twin-turbo--600000-1
I would never have my pure pristine analogue corrupted by the mere presence of digital in the same chassis. I mean! having a lot of digital stuff, right Inside my TT? If the scanner, HDTV camera and control were all analog then and only then would I consider this TT. don’t mind the result product to cost much more.
Rube Goldberg would have had a field day with this TT.
Does anyone, I mean just one person, ever bought one?
Looks like somebody spent too much time with the Erector Set toy when they were a child.
Might be a nice person and lots of bits there for the money but IME the arm in 4 rods is a catastrophe of added resonance and it looks like the pivot isn't at the same height as the stylus (sadly common) and the drive system uses what is generally considered poor practice amongst engineers.
He is. His earlier prototypes were much more beautiful than this one.
He is. His earlier prototypes were much more beautiful than this one.
Might be a nice person and lots of bits there for the money but IME the arm in 4 rods is a catastrophe of added resonance and it looks like the pivot isn't at the same height as the stylus (sadly common) and the drive system uses what is generally considered poor practice amongst engineers.