This is a review and detailed measurements of the Infinity R253 tower speaker. I purchased this months ago with one of those crazy sales prices JBL often has. Right now is one such occasion with the cost dropping to US $160 from list price of $400.
Considering what you get, the retail cost is hard to believe:
Dual woofers, mid-range, and tweeter in a nicely finished box for just $200? Stunning.
Back panel shows dual ports:
Measurements that you are about to see were performed using the Klippel Near-field Scanner (NFS). This is a robotic measurement system that analyzes the speaker all around and is able (using advanced mathematics and dual scan) to subtract room reflections (so where I measure it doesn't matter). It also measures the speaker at close distance ("near-field") which sharply reduces the impact of room noise. Both of these factors enable testing in ordinary rooms yet results that can be more accurate than an anechoic chamber. In a nutshell, the measurements show the actual sound coming out of the speaker independent of the room.
The system performed over 1000 measurements which resulted in error rate of more or less 1%.
Temperature was 61 degrees F.
Measurements are compliant with latest speaker research into what can predict the speaker preference and is standardized in CEA/CTA-2034 ANSI specifications. Likewise listening tests are performed per research that shows mono listening is much more revealing of differences between speakers than stereo or multichannel.
Reference axis is the center of the tweeter. I also tried it at mid-point between midrange and tweeter but it made no difference.
EDIT: something had gone wrong physically with my measurement mic in the original review. The cap on it had come loose and then proceeded to rotate 45 degrees, hanging by a thread! It was not that way when I started the measurements but somehow ended there. That changed the high frequency resonances of the mic, resulting in peaking that we had. I have remeasured the speaker and edited the data in this review now.
Infinity 253 Measurements
Acoustic measurements can be grouped in a way that can be perceptually analyzed to determine how good a speaker is and how it can be used in a room. This so called spinorama shows us just about everything we need to know about the speaker with respect to tonality and some flaws:
The on-axis response is pretty good from 100 Hz to about 1.5 kHz. Then it becomes a bit messy followed by shelving up starting at 4 kHz. Deviation is not huge but likely going to make the speaker sound bright without the delicious detail I like to hear around 1 to 2 kHz.
Directivity (how similar on and off axis response are) is good so equalization should work.
Because directivity is good, early window reflections show same issues:
Putting the two together tells us what we already know about predicted in-room frequency response:
We like to have more of a tilt than what we have here as otherwise the speaker will sound bright. Reduction of bass energy between 50 and 100 Hz will accentuate this brightness.
Here is the near-field response:
The tweeter level is higher but doesn't peak the same away. Perhaps that bowtie guard keeps it from doing this when measured in near field?
Distortion levels were disappointing as well:
Inclusion of midrange provides good directivity:
Other than that dip around 2 kHz, that is excellent response.
Here is our vertical response:
You have much more degrees of freedom as compared to 2-way bookshelves. Still, best to stay at or below tweeter axis as otherwise you get more of that 2 kHz dip.
Impedance graph shows a couple of resonances although I don't see a sign of the first one in the spin:
Infinity R253 Speaker Listening Tests
In the original review, I failed to get rid of the brightness in this speaker despite using my measurements as a rule. The new measurements show why I went wrong as we just need a broad shelving filter to get rid of the brightness:
I then boosted up the mids around 2 kHz and that provided a bit more detail in that critical region.
I really liked the sound so I started to click to my playlist only to be greeted with my Mark Levinson No 53 shutting down again.
Powered back on and bam, it happened again. Switched in an old Infinity bookshelf speaker. No problem whatsoever. Put the R253 in, turn up the volume and shut down again. Switch to my Revel Salon 2 speakers. No problem with even ear bleeding levels. Something in this speaker is causing the protection in my amplifier to turn on. Having tested nearly 100 speakers with the same amplifier, it definitely is not due to the amp being overly sensitive.
EDIT: Well, it turned out (later) that one of my Mark Levinson amps driving this speaker was indeed failing (gradually). It proceeded to get worse so this should NOT impact this speaker's performance and review.
If it had stayed running, I would have likely added in some bass to level the 40 to 100 Hz as that worked well before.
Conclusions
The Infinity Reference 253 is one hell of a package. You couldn't build one quarter of it for what they are selling it for right now. The new measurements show excellent performance, sans two bits: a dip around 2 kHz and too much treble energy. Both were easily fixable with EQ. Alas, I could not listen for long due to it not getting along with my amplifier. How much this issue translates to others using the speaker, I don't know.
The faults above keep me from recommending the Infinity R253 even though it can be a killer speaker if you use EQ and it doesn't shut down on you. You have the data to decide for yourself.
EDIT: with the fault now identified to be the amp, I am going to move to giving a recommendation to Infinity RS253.
New spin data is enclosed.
------------
As always, questions, comments, recommendations, etc. are welcome.
Any donations are much appreciated using: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/how-to-support-audio-science-review.8150/
Considering what you get, the retail cost is hard to believe:
Dual woofers, mid-range, and tweeter in a nicely finished box for just $200? Stunning.
Back panel shows dual ports:
Measurements that you are about to see were performed using the Klippel Near-field Scanner (NFS). This is a robotic measurement system that analyzes the speaker all around and is able (using advanced mathematics and dual scan) to subtract room reflections (so where I measure it doesn't matter). It also measures the speaker at close distance ("near-field") which sharply reduces the impact of room noise. Both of these factors enable testing in ordinary rooms yet results that can be more accurate than an anechoic chamber. In a nutshell, the measurements show the actual sound coming out of the speaker independent of the room.
The system performed over 1000 measurements which resulted in error rate of more or less 1%.
Temperature was 61 degrees F.
Measurements are compliant with latest speaker research into what can predict the speaker preference and is standardized in CEA/CTA-2034 ANSI specifications. Likewise listening tests are performed per research that shows mono listening is much more revealing of differences between speakers than stereo or multichannel.
Reference axis is the center of the tweeter. I also tried it at mid-point between midrange and tweeter but it made no difference.
EDIT: something had gone wrong physically with my measurement mic in the original review. The cap on it had come loose and then proceeded to rotate 45 degrees, hanging by a thread! It was not that way when I started the measurements but somehow ended there. That changed the high frequency resonances of the mic, resulting in peaking that we had. I have remeasured the speaker and edited the data in this review now.
Infinity 253 Measurements
Acoustic measurements can be grouped in a way that can be perceptually analyzed to determine how good a speaker is and how it can be used in a room. This so called spinorama shows us just about everything we need to know about the speaker with respect to tonality and some flaws:
The on-axis response is pretty good from 100 Hz to about 1.5 kHz. Then it becomes a bit messy followed by shelving up starting at 4 kHz. Deviation is not huge but likely going to make the speaker sound bright without the delicious detail I like to hear around 1 to 2 kHz.
Directivity (how similar on and off axis response are) is good so equalization should work.
Because directivity is good, early window reflections show same issues:
Putting the two together tells us what we already know about predicted in-room frequency response:
We like to have more of a tilt than what we have here as otherwise the speaker will sound bright. Reduction of bass energy between 50 and 100 Hz will accentuate this brightness.
Here is the near-field response:
The tweeter level is higher but doesn't peak the same away. Perhaps that bowtie guard keeps it from doing this when measured in near field?
Distortion levels were disappointing as well:
Inclusion of midrange provides good directivity:
Other than that dip around 2 kHz, that is excellent response.
Here is our vertical response:
You have much more degrees of freedom as compared to 2-way bookshelves. Still, best to stay at or below tweeter axis as otherwise you get more of that 2 kHz dip.
Impedance graph shows a couple of resonances although I don't see a sign of the first one in the spin:
Infinity R253 Speaker Listening Tests
In the original review, I failed to get rid of the brightness in this speaker despite using my measurements as a rule. The new measurements show why I went wrong as we just need a broad shelving filter to get rid of the brightness:
I then boosted up the mids around 2 kHz and that provided a bit more detail in that critical region.
EDIT: Well, it turned out (later) that one of my Mark Levinson amps driving this speaker was indeed failing (gradually). It proceeded to get worse so this should NOT impact this speaker's performance and review.
If it had stayed running, I would have likely added in some bass to level the 40 to 100 Hz as that worked well before.
Conclusions
The Infinity Reference 253 is one hell of a package. You couldn't build one quarter of it for what they are selling it for right now. The new measurements show excellent performance, sans two bits: a dip around 2 kHz and too much treble energy. Both were easily fixable with EQ. Alas, I could not listen for long due to it not getting along with my amplifier. How much this issue translates to others using the speaker, I don't know.
EDIT: with the fault now identified to be the amp, I am going to move to giving a recommendation to Infinity RS253.
New spin data is enclosed.
------------
As always, questions, comments, recommendations, etc. are welcome.
Any donations are much appreciated using: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/how-to-support-audio-science-review.8150/
Attachments
Last edited: