Continuing the discussion from this post
I think this long write-up is beside the point. I understand Harman is a well-researched preference, I have no qualms about that. The point I was responding to initially was this statement by Amir: The first bolded part is about that if the producing side of music has disagreeing opinions...
www.audiosciencereview.com
With
@Mr. Haelscheir
Fiest of all, sorry for the late reponse. I had a lot of things happening and I couldn't get back to you sooner.
In the meantime I've tried numerous binauralisers:
- Hesuvi with all the supplied HRTFs
- Equaliser APO with the two crossover options (Jan Meier and ...)
- APL Virtuoso
- My own homebrew plugin stack with EQ'd and Delay crossover.
So this is without any personalised earfish HRTF.
Out of these, APL Virtuoso is the clear winner of giving me the illusion of sitting in a room listening to speakers. It blew my mind to be honest, as if my headphones disappeared. It has gained a permanent place in my monitoring chain, and I use it now 90% of the time mixing.
On the bottom rank are the HRTFs in the Hesuvi pack. I went through all of them, and none of them sound even remotely good to me, in any way. Either weird and unpleasing EQ and phasing, or no noticeable virtualisation effect.
The Jan Meier algorithm in Equaliser APO is alright. A bit more convincing than my homebrew chain, but also a bit more unbalanced in the EQ. Both are servicable but not great.
Have you tried APL Virtuoso?