Thanks, I will do the search and listen to their arguments.If you do a google search you can find an interview wherein Bruno and Lars discuss GaN fet's and why they haven't felt the need to use them. There are some serious technical reasons why their advantages over silicon fets aren't easily exploited in audio amplifiers.
There's another issue I try to figure out for myself as well, I have 4 rooms all with different equipment build in the last 20-30 years. All different amps and speakers and frequency responses and Sinad and so on.. all different colors, solid state, 300b vs el tube amps, to NOS and OS r2r dacs to the newest AKM chips, different cables, net filters , grounding, chrysek vs accusilicon and so on.
At one day in one of the setups I changed an >300 euro expensive hdmi cable from a wellknown brand for a specific so called 'tailormade' cheap chinese 99.99 silver I2s cable from Ali. I know this sounds like psychiatry but the music started to become very interesting in that I wanted to hear all my favourite tracks again and again. Since this eye /ear opening moment I am starting to become a little frustrated with expensive audiophile recommendations and marketing of expensive stuff.
this said, If you ask me to choose between timing , frequency or resolution, at this moment in my journey I would say it's 'timing' worth doing the further research.
and this braught me in the hands of the marketeers of the SMSL PA200 with their 'short dead time nanoseconds' but I now get the feeling I might be misled, or just don't understand how it works from an engineer's perspective.
Does this dead time shortening has any correlation with something our brains pick up?
Last edited: