D2013
Major Contributor
GOOD! We need a block feature. Make it so Scotty!
To an extent your requested functionality already exists.
GOOD! We need a block feature. Make it so Scotty!
Yes, just noticed the "ignore" feature after searching for block. Never felt the need before. Will put the feature to use. Thanks.To an extent your requested functionality already exists.
I agree. It is certainly possible to limit discussion to the objective impact the tariff actions have on our hifi purchases. First and foremost, the elimination of the de minimis exemption. Then the % applied and the sometimes absurd brokerage fees that come along for the ride once duties are applied. Is a $100 amp now $150? $350? This could be an apolitical discussion, but in this day and age its unlikely to stay that way.It's safe to say that these tariffs will affect the cost of nearly all the audio equipment discussed here. How can that be ignored, and why would it necessarily include a political point of view?
The duties to Europe, for now, have been suspended but they are there.I am not directly affected by these specific tariffs as I live in the EU, but if every imported item to be reviewed is going to be affected then a comment seems reasonable
I agree. It is certainly possible to limit discussion to the objective impact the tariff actions have on our hifi purchases. First and foremost, the elimination of the de minimis exemption. Then the % applied and the sometimes absurd brokerage fees that come along for the ride once duties are applied. Is a $100 amp now $150? $350? This could be an apolitical discussion, but in this day and age its unlikely to stay that way.
The challenge comes with a large part of our community being either unable or unwilling to self-censor and limit their discussion to the numbers and not wander off into opinions about if we should have the tariffs or not, the intelligence of those who favor or oppose them, etc. Case in point: the very first reply to your statement (post #95 above) immediately wandered into opinion on political motivations behind the tariffs.
Its disappointing to me that we cannot discuss the former without being swamped by the latter. Because I think the U.S. folks here on the forum would probably like to know that sub-$800 shipments from China will have a $100 per item tariff applied to them beginning May 1 (rises to $200 on June 1) plus brokerage fees which could easily add $20-50 on top of that. This is by far the single most impactful event on this community's purchasing habits in the history of this forum, and we are expected to pretend its not happening?
I'm withholding my opinions on the intelligence of these tariffs and the likely social/political consequences. Amir, on other other hand, felt compelled to not limit his thoughts. As the proprietor of this site, he has that freedom. But I can understand the frustration of the moderators in response to that apparent double standar
My father fought in Korea and the Cold War for 30 years in the Air Force and 13 years working for the Navy until his retirement in 1993. I spent my 4 years fighting the Cold War (literally and figuratively, was stationed in Alaska) and moved to forward bases several times when Russian bombers encroached. To see the traitors in our government supporting Russia now fills me with rage. I took an oath to to fight America's enemies both foreign and domestic.The duties to Europe, for now, have been suspended but they are there.
This question of duties is bringing together nations that have always been "enemies" like Japan and China who are looking for trade agreements.
China is negotiating with Europe to remove duties on electric cars produced in China.
Europe will invest 800 billion in armaments (which will be produced at home...).
Outside the USA the rest of the world is reacting and not as the American administration thought ("kiss my ass").
Good evening to all of you
Dude doesn't abide?Is it possible to block an entire thread?
Is it possible to block an entire thread?