• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

ICEpower Conductor

Not sure the rectangle chip confirms it uses the ICC5 chip. I can understand the logic in that the 125ASX2 data sheet uses an image of a board with the longer rectangle chip where there was previously a square chip. However, there is no definitive evidence (so far) which proves that longer rectangle chip is anything to do with ICC5. The 125ASX2 data sheet clearly states it is using the new “conductor” topology but it could easily be using an image of an earlier version board. A number of the modules in the ICEpower web shop have data sheets using images of older version boards. That seems fine (ish) because version revisions may be so minor there’s no need to update the image. It would be misleading if they are still shipping ICCX boards to customers while stating said product uses the new topology and ICC5 chip. I’ve ordered a couple of 125ASX2 boards directly from ICEpower so we will find out soon enough. If they are using ICCX and none of the chips on the board say ICC5 I’ll be investigating what’s going on directly with ICEpower.

You can zoom in on the chips with a decent phone camera and read the ICC numbers. That’s what I did with the 700as2 boards from Parts Express a few weeks ago. They were a mixture of chips including ICC1, ICC3 etc. Boards that use such a mix are referred to as ICCX, in my understanding.
 
Last edited:
Afaik.
 
For the 125asx2 the pics of the 2 units are pretty stark in its differences and the ones I got have all the different cues…..pretty confident they are the conductor and this is more of a case of Icepower having utter contempt for the hobbyist about why it’s so difficult to know what’s fully going on. lol. The rectangle chip is just the quickest deference to spot.

The 700as2 is a different animal, I haven’t seen pictures or any clear guidance usually to identify tidy the difference. That and I already have a 1200as2 build so I’m in no rush to even worrry about it.
 
This ICEpower 125ASX2 module is sporting the new ICC5 chip. It was ordered from the ICEpower web shop last week:

IMG_5008.jpeg
IMG_5002.jpeg
IMG_5007.jpeg
 
Afaik.
Your list seem to contain a mix of price/pair and mono amps wrt to price. Like 2pcs of 125AXS but just one Topping P5....?

//
 
Last edited:
The 50ASX2SE and BTL are next up. datasheet updated on 17-7-25

On soundimports the modules are €140. A 125ASX2 is €220 and goes up to 500W in BTL with simular thd numbers.

I think it's underpowered for anything other than a nearfield studio monitor when used as a stereo amplifier.
As a BTL amp it is in the realm of the the Fosi Audio V3 Mono that is €160 with the 48V PSU.
A kit with the 50ASX2 is €300 for either the stereo or the mono version.

I don't think there is a place for these in the DIY or budget market. OEM designers might use them when they can get them cheap in bulk.
1753349776729.png




1753350025840.png
 
Any news on moving the rest of the platform to the conductor? Can't wait for a 1200as1 conductor to make the ultimate mono
 
I highly doubt they will re-do the ICEedge boards. They’re just fine the way they are, and they’ll do the other boards first anyway.
Yep, it would make a lot more sense to update 700as1/2 which could be the sweet spot as it's both cheap and modestly powerful, allows hooking 300a1/2 to it, etc.
 
Just wonder why no Chinese companies offer Icepower ICC5 conductor amplifiers, if ICC5 is a much better technology than PFFB as Guntars Smits suggested. Fosi Audio, Aiyima, Doik Audio, O-Noorus, Ampapa, none of them.
 
"Just wonder why no Chinese companies offer Icepower ICC5 conductor amplifiers"
May be because Chinese companies are always going to the cheapest solution (bill of material cost).
 
Just wonder why no Chinese companies offer Icepower ICC5 conductor amplifiers, if ICC5 is a much better technology than PFFB as Guntars Smits suggested. Fosi Audio, Aiyima, Doik Audio, O-Noorus, Ampapa, none of them.
The same reason they also do not offer any Hypex or Purifi-based amps: you have to buy the modules, and they are expensive compared to creating your own PCB and buying the individual parts.
 
There was a flood of counterfakes or rejected modules at sometime, specially 1200as2.
Although no one knowing a thing or two about gear would buy such modules from somewhere other than the official sellers.
 
It’s not like Chinese engineers can’t make/copy a good amp, but to do it properly is no cheaper than Putzey’s and co do it anyway. The fact the Eigentakt modules are even an option (though top tier) for the lay man is a very under appreciated one imo.
 
There was a flood of counterfakes or rejected modules at sometime, specially 1200as2.
Although no one knowing a thing or two about gear would buy such modules from somewhere other than the official sellers.
300%
 
Back
Top Bottom