I got a taste for IEMs, and now I want more

[ziggurcat]

The Zero 2.https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/7hz-x-crinacle-zero-2-iem-review.50534/unread

You mean the bit where he says, "Stunningly low distortion!", and the graph shows it barely registers?

Also:

 

[zorox]

Wrong link. Scroll down to conclusions.https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/truthear-x-crinacle-zero-red-iem-review.44865/unread. Like i said, i could be wrong.

 

[ziggurcat]

Wrong link. Scroll down to conclusions.https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/truthear-x-crinacle-zero-red-iem-review.44865/unread. Like i said, i could be wrong.

Your link is for the Zero Red, not the Zero 2. I mentioned that I got the Zero 2 in the OP. I don't mean this to be mean, but I think you are confusing the Zero 2 with a different IEM.

 

[zorox]

Did you scroll down to his conclusion? In his review of the zero red, he mentions his preference for the red over the 2 . Bye.

 

[Asher]

Did you scroll down to his conclusion? In his review of the zero red, he mentions his preference for the red over the 2 . Bye.

He referenced distortion with the original Truthear Zero, not the 7Hz Zero:2. The Zero:RED review was 5/20/23, the Zero:2 wasn't reviewed until 12/18/23.

 

[ziggurcat]

Did you scroll down to his conclusion? In his review of the zero red, he mentions his preference for the red over the 2 . Bye.

The conclusion:

"I am happy with either but like the lower distortion in RED. If I want more spatial effects, I can dial up the mid treble. I could not reduce distortion the original Zero."

What @Asher said. Plus, the Zero 2 shows much better distortion measurements than the RED, so it doesn't make sense that he would complain about distortion on the Zero 2 when it's virtually non-existent.