• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

I DON’T KNOW WHAT TO MAKE OF IT.

Beave

Major Contributor
Joined
May 10, 2020
Messages
1,336
Likes
2,739
Its makes a difference to me and thats all it matters to me. So, this is not up for debate or discussion.

Any claims are up for skepticism, whether the claimant likes it or not.
 

Beave

Major Contributor
Joined
May 10, 2020
Messages
1,336
Likes
2,739
The voltage drop difference across a OFC cable and silver coated cable should be so small as to be imperceptible.

Well, he claimed it increased brightness of his speakers, which would imply a frequency response change - all from a cable coating. Not from a large change in length, nor from a large change in gauge. Just from a coating, from one material to another with very similar conductivity.

The cable resistance would barely change, and same for the capacitance and inductance.

So it's a highly dubious claim.
 

Doodski

Grand Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Dec 9, 2019
Messages
20,753
Likes
20,784
Location
Canada
Well, he claimed it increased brightness of his speakers, which would imply a frequency response change - all from a cable coating. Not from a large change in length, nor from a large change in gauge. Just from a coating, from one material to another with very similar conductivity.

The cable resistance would barely change, and same for the capacitance and inductance.

So it's a highly dubious claim.
I agree.
 

escksu

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Jul 16, 2020
Messages
965
Likes
397
Any claims are up for skepticism, whether the claimant likes it or not.

You are free to interpret it in anyway you want. Btw, stating a personal experience is not a claim. They are 2 different things.

A claim means: an assertion that something is true. I did not ever mentioned that my experience is true. My experience could be placebo, could be due to other factors as well.

So, what I don't agree is you using the word 'claim'.
 
Last edited:

RayDunzl

Grand Contributor
Central Scrutinizer
Joined
Mar 9, 2016
Messages
13,204
Likes
16,986
Location
Riverview FL
A friend was switching out cables in his system. For fun, we were listening as cables were switched out. We were not expecting a difference, and both he and I heard an improvement.


Obvious rhetorical question:

Why don't the new cables ever sound worse?


Disclaimer:

Bi-wire AWG2 occupying a proud position in the rat's nest

19 strands of approximately AWG18 in the sleeve.

The cable was manufactured in 1992.


1628217174018.png


No claims other than low DC resistance, no cost (would have all been sold to the recycler, so that opportunity cost was lost), and they work.
 
Last edited:

MarcT

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Nov 14, 2019
Messages
931
Likes
612
Location
East Texas
Yes, I fully agreed. However, this also means I cannot just put a blanket statement and say ALL cables sound the same (keyword here is ALL). If someone decide to use a 30AWG wire, I don't think it will sound the same as 12AWG one.

So, I would say, as long as we adhere to some simple guidelines (some examples below), its ok.

1. ~12AWG is recommended.
2. Avoid CCA. No reason to use them.
3. Avoid solid core. Use stranded wire.
4. Use a high purity copper. ASTM C11040 specifies 99.9% purity for electrical copper wires. Hence, there is no reason to use one that is copper alloy (eg 70% copper). Oxygen free copper is pretty much the norm these days as well.
5. Shielding is not needed for speaker cables. IF installed in walls, do not run them together with power cables.

Just curious, what is the down side of solid core?
 

MarcT

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Nov 14, 2019
Messages
931
Likes
612
Location
East Texas
So if I understand correctly, you would reject any cable which seemed to sound better than others because that outcome is inconsistent with your beliefs about cables? If so, then I guess you and I have different priorities.

And just for the record, I do not BEGIN to expect you or anyone else to alter their beliefs because of anything I say. I related my experience in response to Chrispy's request.

Yes, it does seem strange that someone would reject a cable which sounded better to them, which presumably would confer greater enjoyment, because it's just not supposed to be possible.
 

MarcT

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Nov 14, 2019
Messages
931
Likes
612
Location
East Texas
Skin effect - affects only alternating current through a conductor.
Now I'm confused. It seems like I consistently see people here say that skin effect is a non-issue in the audible range. Is that not correct?
 

boselover61

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 3, 2020
Messages
302
Likes
310
I bought a new expensive shirt and i felt different too. Not better just different. Probably because the old ones didnt fit anymore since i got fat.
 

Chrispy

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 7, 2020
Messages
7,757
Likes
5,918
Location
PNW
The only thing I wanted to do is to point out what amirm said. Thats all. What you think or believe has nothing to do with me and neither am I here to change it.
You made no such actual connection really. Just self justification for your own wire fetish perhaps? Otherwise what is your point?
 

IronPyrite

Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2021
Messages
35
Likes
32
Location
Seattle Area
Folks... This is first and foremost a science forum. There are plenty of other forums where no one will give you a hard time if you discuss subjective observations. Many folks come here as refugees from other forums, out of exhaustion from hearing "unprovable" at best, and potentially "snake oil" at worst, claims in literally every forum post.

Subjective observations aren't against forum rules, just be prepare to get "where's the data to back your claim?" challenges from folks who come here because they'd rather discuss claims based on facts.

For example, @drplinker stated above that "'Skin effect' affects only alternating current through a conductor." While I disagree based on my own experience of using solid vs. stranded speaker cables, I'm not going to argue the point until I find a scientific source I can cite as evidence to back my assertion (sorry if it sounds like I'm passively arguing the point by using it as an example - that was not my intent).
 

drplinker

Member
Joined
May 1, 2021
Messages
37
Likes
68
Location
Seattle
Now I'm confused. It seems like I consistently see people here say that skin effect is a non-issue in the audible range. Is that not correct?

From my EE course, I recall skin effect being a factor in long distance power transmission at 22kV 60Hz, indeed skin depth (current carrying cross section) reduces with increase in frequency. I don't recall any formulae now, but from wikipedia:

Skin_depth_by_Zureks.png


Found this https://www.belden.com/blogs/broadcast/understanding-skin-effect-and-frequency/ (not verified)
 

escksu

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Jul 16, 2020
Messages
965
Likes
397
You made no such actual connection really. Just self justification for your own wire fetish perhaps? Otherwise what is your point?

What you think has nothing to do with me. I am not obliged to justify anything to anyone in this forum. If you dislike what I post, you are free to ignore. If you think it is against the rules, you are free to report it to the mods.
 

trl

Major Contributor
King of Mods
Joined
Feb 28, 2018
Messages
1,967
Likes
2,523
Location
Iasi, RO
I’m not going to search for adjectives to describe what happened. I’ll just say that the sound was different. Not better but different.

I was stunned. It wasn’t supposed to be different. All cables sound like same. The measurements prove it. But the difference wasn’t subtle, it was unmistakable.

To be continued in Part II.
I do like your article, mostly because this was happening to all of us at least once in a lifetime. I'm not speaking about cables only, but also about perceived (not audible! and not measurable!) differences in sound after changing a piece from our audio gear. Sometimes was maybe a small channel imbalance, sometimes was the same track played at different volumes, but sometimes was simply our mind playing tricks with us, especially when purchasing new audio equipment.

I am going to present here couple of times when this was happening to me:
- 1) When I swapped the amplifier from Pioneer A-209R to Yamaha A-S701 I felt lack of deep bass in the living room, although I had zero expectancy of any sound changing, because I haven't swapped the old amp just to do an upgrade, but I simply needed a new amp in the living room so I can move the old one to my kid's room. I knew my mind is playing tricks on me. So, I decided to not listen to my new amp for two weeks hoping that things will get back to normal and this is what it actually happened after two weeks of waiting: deep bass got back there without doing nothing else. ;)
- 2) I swapped 2 x SVS SB1000 (2 x 300 W RMS) with 1 x SVS SB3000 (1 x 800 W RMS) and I felt a lack of subbas, although the windows were almost cracking during the tests I did. o_O WTF?!? This was impossible, of course, so I left everything untouched for couple of weeks, then I left in vacation (I almost forgot I've upgraded the subs), then when I got back the subbass was absolutely impeccable and way better than it used to be with the older and smaller subwoofers. :cool: I've also compared the REW graphs proving that on the last octave, between 20-40 Hz, the SB3000 is filling it better and at a higher SPL than 2 x SB1000, so I won't let my mind playing tricks on me anymore with this audiophoolia stuff. I will always use REW or null-test or A/B test or I'll simply wait for couple of weeks for the "new audio gear" effect to pass by.

It's all about our mind's expectations when we purchase new audio gear, even if we think that the new gear should not sound and not measure any better, our mind sometimes might disagree.

Note: Hope you noticed I've used the "perceived" term instead of "audible", as I really think this is the most correct word for such cases.

P.S.: Somehow on-topic: I'm using 4mm2 pure OFC copper and gold-plated bananas from my amp to the speakers. This will ensure low cable resistance up to at least 10m lenght, so damping factor and power loss should have almost no effect here. I got the cheapest brand available on Thomann (Sommercable I think)... about 70 EUR per total (about 15 meters for both speakers + 4 bananas).
 

Chrispy

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 7, 2020
Messages
7,757
Likes
5,918
Location
PNW
IF you think that way, so be it. What you think has nothing to do with me.
You were the one who brought it up. Figured where you were going with it in any case.
 

escksu

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Jul 16, 2020
Messages
965
Likes
397
Folks... This is first and foremost a science forum. There are plenty of other forums where no one will give you a hard time if you discuss subjective observations. Many folks come here as refugees from other forums, out of exhaustion from hearing "unprovable" at best, and potentially "snake oil" at worst, claims in literally every forum post.

Subjective observations aren't against forum rules, just be prepare to get "where's the data to back your claim?" challenges from folks who come here because they'd rather discuss claims based on facts.

For example, @drplinker stated above that "'Skin effect' affects only alternating current through a conductor." While I disagree based on my own experience of using solid vs. stranded speaker cables, I'm not going to argue the point until I find a scientific source I can cite as evidence to back my assertion (sorry if it sounds like I'm passively arguing the point by using it as an example - that was not my intent).

This is not recognise by any authority nor and science institutions to be a science forum. Hence, I would not call it a science forum. I would say just forum dedicated to audio related matters.
 
Top Bottom