• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

I discovered something very interesting about digital vs vinyl.

Status
Not open for further replies.

FrantzM

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Mar 12, 2016
Messages
4,372
Likes
7,864
I took both of those files, inverted the polarity of one of them, and then mixed them together.

This was the result.

(Complete silence proves there was absolutely no difference between the files.)
Perhaps if I had used an audio chain with blacker backgrounds... I might have heard .... something. :cool:
 

Guermantes

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2018
Messages
486
Likes
562
Location
Brisbane, Australia
@guitar sam, Here are the first clips you posted (Lady Writer), spectrums compared with DeltaWave (thanks @pkane):
1606437730207.png


So I converted the FLAC (0) file to FLAC (4) myself using iZotope RX6 and got a bit-perfect match at 16 bits:
1606441611969.png


So something in your conversion has caused aliasing. Check your RX chain.
 

voodooless

Grand Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jun 16, 2020
Messages
10,372
Likes
18,290
Location
Netherlands
We’re repeating ourselves..
 

Joachim Herbert

Senior Member
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 20, 2019
Messages
465
Likes
680
Location
Munich, Germany

RayDunzl

Grand Contributor
Central Scrutinizer
Joined
Mar 9, 2016
Messages
13,247
Likes
17,162
Location
Riverview FL
OP
G

guitar sam

Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2020
Messages
12
Likes
2
guitar sam here and i'm quite aware that flac 16/44 at 0 compression is the same as flac compression level 4 however in a/b testing i can pick out the flac 4 every time because it's like comparing mono to stereo just like listening to a remastered vinyl album cut from a digital copy of the master will have mono depth perception which is nothing more than a vinyl cd and vinyl cut directly from the reel to reel master will have stereo depth perception which is why vinyl made a big comeback because teenagers started listening to there parents old vinyl record and when the record companies started pressing vinyl again they made sure that the new vinyl had mono depth perception to remove the hypersonic effect which made your brain release dopomine and you no longer needed prozac. it's only a conspiracy until you can prove it. my settings for izotope rx5/rx7 are comercial flac at 16/44 compression level 0 to level 4 + i use the time & pitch filter to remove the dynamic compression from digital audio which increases the dynamic range along with the sound quality.
 

danadam

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Jan 20, 2017
Messages
978
Likes
1,522
RMS of the difference of spectra: –385dB

I think it's fair to say that the two audio streams are as close as it gets
@pkane Out of curiosity, shouldn't that be "−inf" for identical files?
 

voodooless

Grand Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jun 16, 2020
Messages
10,372
Likes
18,290
Location
Netherlands
@pkane Out of curiosity, shouldn't that be "−inf" for identical files?

384 dB is the dynamic range of a 64 bit integer, so that is probably where it comes from.

But indeed these files are identical in contrary to the first set. I don't even need any advanced audio software to prove that:

MD5 (04 - it's oh so quiet - Björk (0).wav) = eed2b79435ea7a72b1babbaa029560b5
MD5 (04 - it's oh so quiet - björk (4).wav) = eed2b79435ea7a72b1babbaa029560b5
 

voodooless

Grand Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jun 16, 2020
Messages
10,372
Likes
18,290
Location
Netherlands
Yes. But he result is displayed for the the limit of accuracy of internal calculations, done in double-precision floating point.

But a 32 bit floating point already has a dynamic range of 1540 dB :oops:
 

andreasmaaan

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jun 19, 2018
Messages
6,652
Likes
9,403
guitar sam here and i'm quite aware that flac 16/44 at 0 compression is the same as flac compression level 4 however in a/b testing i can pick out the flac 4 every time because it's like comparing mono to stereo just like listening to a remastered vinyl album cut from a digital copy of the master will have mono depth perception which is nothing more than a vinyl cd and vinyl cut directly from the reel to reel master will have stereo depth perception which is why vinyl made a big comeback because teenagers started listening to there parents old vinyl record and when the record companies started pressing vinyl again they made sure that the new vinyl had mono depth perception to remove the hypersonic effect which made your brain release dopomine and you no longer needed prozac. it's only a conspiracy until you can prove it. my settings for izotope rx5/rx7 are comercial flac at 16/44 compression level 0 to level 4 + i use the time & pitch filter to remove the dynamic compression from digital audio which increases the dynamic range along with the sound quality.

Very cute how you introduce yourself as "guitar sam" at the beginning of each post.

However, we have already "proved it". The two tracks that you believe you're hearing a difference between are absolutely identical down to at least -385dB (limit of calculation), which is almost 300dB below the absolute threshold of audibility for humans.

It literally does not matter what your software is or what your settings are; the files are identical. Case closed.

Goodbye :p
 

Pluto

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Sep 2, 2018
Messages
990
Likes
1,631
Location
Harrow, UK
my settings for izotope rx5/rx7 are comercial flac at 16/44 compression level 0 to level 4 + i use the time & pitch filter to remove the dynamic compression from digital audio which increases the dynamic range along with the sound quality.
This is the audio equivalent of giving an 8 year old a chainsaw to play with.
 

Pluto

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Sep 2, 2018
Messages
990
Likes
1,631
Location
Harrow, UK
Izotope RX is a set of highly innovative, very powerful but complex, tools that can be commercial lifesavers. I bought a copy a couple of years ago (c. £1k) that paid for itself in just one job as I was able to rescue the audio from an unrepeatable shoot which, otherwise, might have been a commercial disaster for the parties involved. I was able to restore the audio to usability. NB, not magnificent hi-fi, usable.

Needless to say, a toolkit this powerful gives you the ability to truly ruin otherwise decent sound.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom