• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

I did measure a difference between my new Kimber 12TC and AudioQuest 14/4

DannyBukem

Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2021
Messages
26
Likes
13
56852B9F-46E3-4BB4-B046-FAA58250892D.jpeg
Hi folks,
I wanted to get peoples views on this. Like many on here, I am super sceptical about speaker cables making a discernible difference to my system but I wanted to share this to see what people thought. I have been using Audioquest 14/4 for about 9 years, connecting musical fidelity power amp to monitor audio Gold 200. I use it in bi-Amp, so utilising all 4 wires.
I recently acquired some Kimber 12TC, I know gene at Audioholics raves about how they measure. Having got REW and Umik-1 recently I thought I would see if there was a measurable difference between the cables and I was surprised to see there was a difference. I used completely the same settings ‘Pure direct’ in my yammy 3080 and same volume level. The really odd thing is that the only difference was between 120-170 hz. After 170hz they are absolutely identical. See the graph above… the red line is Kimber, the blue is Audioquest. Weirdly you could argue AQ measure better than Kimber but thought the Kimber sounded slightly louder. Interestingly the Kimber seemed to have about an 8db difference in the room mode I seem to have from 160 hz.

For background, I took 5 readings of each cable then averaged them, both the average and every test showed identical results so it’s definitely not just the way I tested it. There is a difference….. anyone know maybe why?
 
OP
D

DannyBukem

Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2021
Messages
26
Likes
13
No mic stayed in the exact same place.

The banana plugs were changed not long ago but the Kimber ones are brand new, they could be a possible reason for sure but why would it only change between 120-170 as I say from 170 hertz to 20khz it’s identical not even a .db difference after 170hz
 

Sokel

Master Contributor
Joined
Sep 8, 2021
Messages
6,038
Likes
6,058
What's really odd is that the difference is not consistent down there,it swings at the opposite at 135Hz or so.
Strange...
 
OP
D

DannyBukem

Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2021
Messages
26
Likes
13
The only big difference physically is far more copper as I’ve bi amped the Kimber with 2 x runs of 12TC to each speaker so there will be an AWG difference for sure but I read on short runs (mine are only 1.5m) awg shouldn’t make that much difference.
 
OP
D

DannyBukem

Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2021
Messages
26
Likes
13
That’s exactly what I did. 5 sweeps of each. You can choose sweep 2 of AQ and sweep 4 of Kimber, the graphs are identical.
 

Sokel

Master Contributor
Joined
Sep 8, 2021
Messages
6,038
Likes
6,058
Real world measurements are my favorites,BUT:
Despite the 5 samples of each,will they be repeatable tomorrow for example (controlled as tight as you can)?
Cause that will be be a very stronger indicator that there is a difference after all.
I mean nothing bad by the above,just to make sure.
 

Sokel

Master Contributor
Joined
Sep 8, 2021
Messages
6,038
Likes
6,058
use 4M long sweeps. and remove smoothing.
We can remove it ourselves if he share the files.

Edit:
It would be nice if acoustic time reference has been used too.
 

MaxwellsEq

Major Contributor
Joined
Aug 18, 2020
Messages
1,717
Likes
2,569
This is very interesting. Have you reversed the process, i.e. run the tests with the new Kimber cable, then plugged the old Audioquest cable back in and run the tests?
 

Blumlein 88

Grand Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 23, 2016
Messages
20,704
Likes
37,443
The low frequencies make me wonder about noise from outside your room. In one band they add to room modes and in another partly cancel them out. Run at a different time of day.

Maybe do a measure at a higher level. Say 10 db higher, assuming that doesn't stress your gear. This would reduce the influence of noise and result in a reduced difference if external noise is the cause of this.

Another check would be to measure the speaker terminals with an ADC (you'll need to step down the voltage) which I would expect to be pretty much identical with either cable.
 

antcollinet

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Sep 4, 2021
Messages
7,622
Likes
12,809
Location
UK/Cheshire
Even if we discount connetion problems:

Are *you* in the room together with the mic? Are you in exactly the same position for the two tests? All furniture, doors etc exactly the same. Any fans running? Temperature the same? No radiators or other heating devices changed state between the tests causing air movement or density changes? Air movement hasn't "settled" between tests? Any other devices in the room (Or outside it) that may be emitting frequencies in that range?

Etc. Etc. Etc.

Problem with audio measurements in the "sound through air" domain, especially when not in an anechoic chamber, is they can be impacted by a hell of a lot of things.

What if you repeat the test, but measure the signals on the speaker terminals instead. You might need to up the game on test gear for this though, but to be honest it is the only way to conclusively check for differences between cables.
 

HarmonicTHD

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Mar 18, 2022
Messages
3,326
Likes
4,834
Where were you during the sweeps?
Did any door / window open?

Can you compare a „simple“ copper loudspeaker cable?
 

Sokel

Master Contributor
Joined
Sep 8, 2021
Messages
6,038
Likes
6,058
Even if we discount connetion problems:

Are *you* in the room together with the mic? Are you in exactly the same position for the two tests? All furniture, doors etc exactly the same. Any fans running? Temperature the same? No radiators or other heating devices changed state between the tests causing air movement or density changes? Air movement hasn't "settled" between tests? Any other devices in the room (Or outside it) that may be emitting frequencies in that range?

Etc. Etc. Etc.

Problem with audio measurements in the "sound through air" domain, especially when not in an anechoic chamber, is they can be impacted by a hell of a lot of things.

What if you repeat the test, but measure the signals on the speaker terminals instead. You might need to up the game on test gear for this though, but to be honest is is the only way to conclusively check for differences between cables.
I thought of exactly the same things but we're talking 5db here,I have never made a measurement that presents such a difference down there at 100-200Hz despite where I sit,what I do,time of day,temp,etc.
I would have to significantly move the speakers or the mic more than 20-30cm to get that (that's why I asked for timing reference)
 
Top Bottom