• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Hypex UcD180HG HxR amplifier module analysis and review

somebodyelse

Major Contributor
Joined
Dec 5, 2018
Messages
3,682
Likes
2,959
That's a fair assessment. I'd look on the continued availability of the UcD modules as spares for those with existing amps. If you want to DIY the FusionAmp line is probably the cheapest way to get the nCore modules, and you get some DSP thrown in which you can use or sell.
 
OP
pma

pma

Major Contributor
Joined
Feb 23, 2019
Messages
4,591
Likes
10,727
Location
Prague
New measurements of my UcD180 implementation, using Topping D10s DAC and E1DA Cosmos ADC. Measurement bandwidth 45kHz and it makes no problem, no parameters degradation.

UcD180_thdpower_4ohm_22-14kHz_BW45kHz.png


UcD180_thdnpower_4ohm_22-14kHz_BW45kHz.png


Please note good consistency of results regardless test frequency and wider measurement bandwidth 45kHz.
 

tmtomh

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Aug 14, 2018
Messages
2,636
Likes
7,486
New measurements of my UcD180 implementation, using Topping D10s DAC and E1DA Cosmos ADC. Measurement bandwidth 45kHz and it makes no problem, no parameters degradation.

View attachment 267186

View attachment 267187

Please note good consistency of results regardless test frequency and wider measurement bandwidth 45kHz.

Dude, how long are you going to bang this drum? Here's @amirm 's test of THD+N, by frequency, using a 45kHz bandwidth signal, for the Audiophonics HPA-S400ET Purifi-based amp:

View attachment 194302

Who cares if your amp has more similar distortion levels by frequency when distortion at the WORST-performing frequency with the Audiophonics amp is LOWER than the distortion at the BEST-performing frequency of yours?

I don't mean to sound rude, but you are obsessed with the distortion being very similar at every frequency, and it's almost pathological how you are so obsessed with this that you ignore what level the distortion is actually at.
 
OP
pma

pma

Major Contributor
Joined
Feb 23, 2019
Messages
4,591
Likes
10,727
Location
Prague
Dude, how long are you going to bang this drum? Here's @amirm 's test of THD+N, by frequency, using a 45kHz bandwidth signal, for the Audiophonics HPA-S400ET Purifi-based amp:

View attachment 194302
And this is the test of UcD180HG with 80kHz measuring BW. And, no low pass measuring filter was used. HF linearity of the 20+years old UcD180 is better than that of NCore and Purify, this is my whole point. Still long way to go for class D to get perfect.
UcD180 spectrum has no rise at high frequency, no HF noise modulation, no HF garbage except for inevitable carrier frequency products. On the contrary, NCore spectrum is full of garbage just above 22kHz. That's why it is measured with low BW to look good in the datasheet.

UcD180 BW80kHz thdfreq 75W4R2.png


UcD180 BW80kHz 15k 75W4R.png


Who cares
Almost no one here, I agree. And almost no one here is able to have a look under the surface and has sufficient circuit design knowledge to be able to discuss and argue in other manner than popular mainstream ASR view.
 
Last edited:

tmtomh

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Aug 14, 2018
Messages
2,636
Likes
7,486
And this is the test of UcD180HG with 80kHz measuring BW. And, no low pass measuring filter was used. HF linearity of the 20+years old UcD180 is better than that of NCore and Purify, this is my whole point. Still long way to go for class D to get perfect.
UcD180 spectrum has no rise at high frequency, no HF noise modulation, no HF garbage except for inevitable carrier frequency products. On the contrary, NCore spectrum is full of garbage just above 22kHz. That's why it is measured with low BW to look good in the datasheet.

View attachment 267322

View attachment 267323


Almost no one here, I agree. And almost no one here is able to have a look under the surface and has sufficient circuit design knowledge to be able to discuss and argue in other manner than popular mainstream ASR view.

Once again you are intentionally avoiding the issue. The newer designs have lower distortion in the audible range. You can keep using words like garbage, but ultrasonic content isn’t garbage or a deviation from “perfection” unless it makes a difference in the audible range.

You are also being quite shady by simply quoting my statement of the phrase "who cares" without quoting the full question I asked: "Who cares if your amp has more similar distortion levels by frequency when distortion at the WORST-performing frequency with the Audiophonics amp is LOWER than the distortion at the BEST-performing frequency of yours?"

You are saying it's better to have higher distortion at ALL frequencies, if the distortion level at EACH frequency is more similar. This is nonsense. At the 10-20 watt range where there are distortion peaks for both designs, the distortion of your preferred module ranges from 0.01% to 0.018%. The distortion of the Purifi ranges from .00006% to 0.009%. If we ADDED 10 times the distortion to the Purifi module at lower frequencies, to bring that 0.0006% up to 0.006%, then by your definition the Purifi would be BETTER than it is now and BETTER than the UcD180.

This is not about perfection. This is about your obsession with a measurement that doesn't matter. Even that would be fine, if your obsession did not lead you to ignore or discount other performance measures that actually do matter.
 
Last edited:

voodooless

Grand Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jun 16, 2020
Messages
10,223
Likes
17,799
Location
Netherlands
Let’s do a ABX between UcD180 (or 400 if you want comparable power) and Nilai…. Would be a fun experiment.
 

DonH56

Master Contributor
Technical Expert
Forum Donor
Joined
Mar 15, 2016
Messages
7,834
Likes
16,496
Location
Monument, CO
Is the UcD180 a self-oscillating design? I am curious where the HF spurs are coming from, too many possibilities...
 

voodooless

Grand Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jun 16, 2020
Messages
10,223
Likes
17,799
Location
Netherlands
Is the UcD180 a self-oscillating design? I am curious where the HF spurs are coming from, too many possibilities...
Yes it is. It’s the “ancient” ancestor of the Nilai and the ones before.
 
OP
pma

pma

Major Contributor
Joined
Feb 23, 2019
Messages
4,591
Likes
10,727
Location
Prague
Output DC offset protection test:

UcD180_DCoffset_response.png


Contrary to the NC252MP, this amplifier has no problems with output DC offset protection. The amplifier does not transfer DC from input to output. For slow input DC rise, the output does not follow the input. For sudden deep input DC overload (-9V), the DC protection has worked after 125ms, which is fine.

Burst power tests

1. 100Hz burst


UcD180_burstpower_100Hz_sm.png

Burst power is limited by the power supply used with "soft" transformer.

UcD180_burstpower_100Hz-2_sm.png

100Hz burst power is 156W/4ohm.

2. 1kHz burst

UcD180_burstpower_1kHz_sm.png

1kHz burst power is 208W.

3. 10kHz burst

UcD180_burstpower_10kHz_sm.png

10kHz burst power is 193W.
 

Freeform

Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2023
Messages
15
Likes
17
I can see the UcD as a very viable option if one already has a chassis and - or with - a transformer / power supply. Soon as I can find that 500+ VA toroidal, check the voltage and it's fit in the box I have, I think that's what I'll do.

If you have to buy chassis, power supply and hardware, the total cost can get too close to the the Hypex kits, or well assembled commercial implementations.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: pma

wizardofoz

Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2019
Messages
41
Likes
34
Location
Singapore
I happened to acquire 2 ucd180hxr modules and an SMPS400a180 so I added 2 amp more modules and a pair of ucd400’s and smps400a400 for my linkwitz LXmini+2 setup, but did a new chassis to hold it all
 

Attachments

  • IMG_6467.jpeg
    IMG_6467.jpeg
    399.3 KB · Views: 123

FrankW

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2023
Messages
393
Likes
373
Yeah yeah, but how does it sound? Maybe you could send to Matt Hooper for a 18000 words review?
 

wizardofoz

Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2019
Messages
41
Likes
34
Location
Singapore
Yeah yeah, but how does it sound? Maybe you could send to Matt Hooper for a 18000 words review?
It’s not done yet but I’m sure it sounds just fine…there are plenty of details out there already, this was really just a post to say that they are still available and work plenty well enough

got mine from http://www.KJFAudi.com … build is in Singapore so I’m not sending anywhere.
 
Top Bottom