Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions.
Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!
Another thing to consider: the Nilai only reaches max output when driven by a power supply capable of providing the necessary input. The stereo Nilai only uses one SMPS, which is shared by the two modules. I don't believe it will drive the two modules to full rated power. You would need a SMPS for each amp module to do that.
OK, changed the jumper to max gain. I now got a lot more power than with the Klout. From what I understand from the graph I lost a bit of SINAD, but whatever. I'm still more than confused about how to understand the relationship between wattage of an amp and volume, but I'll read more about it in the next days. At least now I can compare it with my Klout the way I intend to. Still feel like I should have bought the monobloc for even more power if I had know this power/volume thing. Thanks a lot for your quick reply.
SINAD doesn't matter as long as you don't hear a hiss.
As to the relationship between rated power ("wattage" is a horrible word only used by non-experts, almost like talking about "horsepowerage" of cars), volume and gain - rated power is the maximum power an amp can produce when driven fully (think of it as maximum horsepower of a car). The actual power is determined by the gain and volume. Think of volume as the gas pedal, and gain as the leverage of the gas pedal - how much you have to press the pedal to get the power you want. Gain relates to sensitivity - what signal level is needed to produce full output.
I like to think gain as how loud it starts, and power loud is finishes.
You can have higher gain and low power, will sound loud with the volume knob low, but once you turn the knob it will distort soon.
And the opposite: a low gain with high power sounds low in low volume, but you can turn the knob and it will keep sounding louder and clear for way longer.
And you know you have too low gain or too low source output when the knob hits the max and the amp still had juice left.
SINAD doesn't matter as long as you don't hear a hiss.
As to the relationship between rated power ("wattage" is a horrible word only used by non-experts, almost like talking about "horsepowerage" of cars), volume and gain - rated power is the maximum power an amp can produce when driven fully (think of it as maximum horsepower of a car). The actual power is determined by the gain and volume. Think of volume as the gas pedal, and gain as the leverage of the gas pedal - how much you have to press the pedal to get the power you want. Gain relates to sensitivity - what signal level is needed to produce full output.
Noticed some folk above saying they were waiting for these amps to become available again, I still have a few in stock - https://kjfaudio.com/product-catego...nents/hypex-amplifier-modules/amplifier-kits/ @amirm if that is to overtly advertising then please feel free to take it down, I meant it for reference only, these will sell even if this post isn't here
While searching information on the linn akurate dsm I found some informations about xlr « Electrical XLR inputs Input sensitivity: can be selected from 2 / 4 / 8 V RMS » while we are talking about xlr outputs I am wondering If your input level would be low and therefore your output would be also… impressive dac anyway…
While searching information on the linn akurate dsm I found some informations about xlr « Electrical XLR inputs Input sensitivity: can be selected from 2 / 4 / 8 V RMS » while we are talking about xlr outputs I am wondering If your input level would be low and therefore your output would be also… impressive dac anyway…
I've seen that too, but I think it applied only to the first generation. I can't find anything in the doc or the settings about it. Anyway, the volume issue was with the internal stream/dac, so it can't be this. Thanks for looking it up.
After a few day with the Nilai500, I can say that it sound amazing with newer recording, and not so good with older ones. Older recordings sounds often too lean. Which made me things that in the older recording studio, they were probably using class A, AB or even tube amps, and with slow speakers. Thus the sound they heard / wanted was heavily coloured by their equipment. To have a somewhat faithful reproduction of the sound they were seeking, you probably need equipment that's a match with what they had at the time. Thus slow and coloured. Is this making any sense?
Maybe the less your amplifier colors your music, the more you are finding out their differences? Like blue pill all masterings are the same, red pill they are different?
After a few day with the Nilai500, I can say that it sound amazing with newer recording, and not so good with older ones. Older recordings sounds often too lean. Which made me things that in the older recording studio, they were probably using class A, AB or even tube amps, and with slow speakers. Thus the sound they heard / wanted was heavily coloured by their equipment. To have a somewhat faithful reproduction of the sound they were seeking, you probably need equipment that's a match with what they had at the time. Thus slow and coloured. Is this making any sense?
I have thought of it so much as to research and find what gear they used when making the final decisions in the studios about my favorite classical recordings (1950 and on).
Monkey coffins,tubes,etc.
I even had the chance to replicate it closely but with much nicer gear and admittedly sounds beautiful BUT not far from an accurate (as much as it can be) gear chain.
Not worth the effort,it's nicer to have ample power (that's the most discriminating factor to me) and gear that can effortlessly reproduce every little peak of your desired level.
I have thought of it so much as to research and find what gear they used when making the final decisions in the studios about my favorite classical recordings (1950 and on).
Monkey coffins,tubes,etc.
I even had the chance to replicate it closely but with much nicer gear and admittedly sounds beautiful BUT not far from an accurate (as much as it can be) gear chain.
Not worth the effort,it's nicer to have ample power (that's the most discriminating factor to me) and gear that can effortlessly reproduce every little peak of your desired level.
That's an impressive quest for sound! I'm not saying that it worth the effort, but I think I'll keep my older gear to build a second system that will be slower and more coloured than my main one. The lost of reverb is want stroked me the most. Acoustic guitar sound a lot leaner. And for simple folk music I don't need a lot of power.
Then you think that the sound they get in the recording studio at the time was just as fast and precise as want we get now? Or you don't believe in artist intend? You maybe know that tube in an amp catch the sound waves and create reverb in the sound output to the speakers. If they were using tube amp in thew studio then suddenly those tube were not affected by that? Just answering with a "witty" is not an argument. What about I twist yours?: "Opinions without basic knowledge lead to all sorts of errors of judgement."