• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Hypex Nilai 500 DIY Stereo Amp Kit Review

Rate this amplifier:

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 4 1.7%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther)

    Votes: 47 20.0%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 184 78.3%

  • Total voters
    235
1765621076733.png


Hoho, somebody is sharing a power supply with two channels
 
The switching components (the heaty stuff) on the PSU are connected to the heatsink on the top side of the board, unlike, say, the other modules (like the amp board) where they are underside.

The former more conventional approach means bolting the PCB to the chassis is unnecessary. This helps prevent physical damage to the switching components, and usually also means the cooling would be sufficient regardless of the bottom chassis. Also gives me a piece of mind knowing the 400V transistors and consequently painful death is not being separated from me by just one thermal pad or a paper-thin silver mica.
 
I don't like the 15K results. I would rather have a Purifi design. The Purifi runs cooler and is more energy efficient.



Nilai500 Stereo Hypex Class D Stereo Amplifier Kit Audio Power 4 ohm vs distortion vs frequenc...png
 
Yes, the 15kHz distortion is lower on other amps... but then this here is also lower than the distortion at much lower frequencies of yet other amps. Haha!

It's a purely academic issue anyway. Yet again we're complaining about lack of total technological perfection that has exactly zero consequence in practical use. The 2nd harmonic of 15 is 30, nobody can hear that except Manbat.

This is a great option if you want true state of the art performance for more than okay money, squeaky clean big power, and a bit of building fun on the side.
 
Last edited:
Wow, wish I needed one.

Unfortunately for my long suffering bank account, I tend to define “want” and “need” interchangeably.

Excellent review Amir!
I haven’t checked prices, but I’m still a Buckeye fan though. I’ve really enjoyed watching their business mature, and at some point I “want/need” to jump into the class D fray.
 
The case gets quite warm to the touch after several hours of use, or on but sitting idle. I'm very happy with the performance of this amp and plan to keep it. One lesson I gleaned from this site is that heat is the enemy of electronic components so I would like to do what I can to improve cooling.
I also converted mine to be dual mono. With the second power supply, it does run warmer than stock. For mine, it was fine with both power supplies as long as I kept my cabinet door open, but it ran warmer than I wanted with the cabinet door closed (but still cooler than my old Adcom amp). Nonetheless, I added Noctua low noise/low rpm fans to the cabinet, and used the included low noise adapters (simple resistors that plugin in series with the fans). Now all of my amps run cool with the cabinet door closed, and I cannot hear the fans. The only time I can hear the fans is if the cabinet door is open and I am standing right next to the cabinet.

In hindsight, had I known that I was going to upgrade it, I just would have started off by buying two mono versions of the amplifier.
 
Last edited:
I like the low profile look, on the other side I wonder if by having such a small case, will the heat impact the long term reliability.
In stock form, I think long term reliability will be fine. I never noticed mine getting too warm, even with my cabinet door closed, until I modified it by adding a second power supply.
 
Just curious as a non-engineer normie, do these class D amps ever get as warm as class A amps that people had for decades?
 
This is a review and detailed measurements of the Hypex Nilai500 DIY Stereo Kit Amplifier. Company sent me an assembled version. The kit costs €1,225.00 (ex VAT) or about US 1,490.
View attachment 496881
The case is rather hefty and I like its horizontal and thin configuration. Rear panel shows purely balanced connections and trigger input:
View attachment 496882
There are three internal gain settings. It was shipped to me set to medium gain and that is how I tested. For other gain settings see my review of Nilai 500 Mono Kit.

Hypex Nilai 500 DIY Stereo Amplifier Measurements
It is reassuring that the medium gain setting matched my previous testing of the mono kit:
View attachment 496883

Distortion if vanishingly low which causes SINAD to be dominated by noise which by itself is superb:
View attachment 496884

Left side of the chart indicates that for any 16 bit content you play, the amplifier is virtually noiseless eve at low power of 5 watts.

The same excellent class D amplifier technology is at play here with wideband gain, eliminating load dependency well into ultrasonics:
View attachment 496885

Crosstalk is excellent:
View attachment 496886

Multitone performance is superb above bass:
View attachment 496887
I didn't see the slightly elevated floor in mono testing. It is harmless though.

19+20 KHz intermodulation highly differentiates it from desktop class D amps with still superbly low distortion:
View attachment 496888

The amplifier protection circuit is quite aggressive in the way it shuts down the amplifier before much, if any, clipping occurs at 4 ohm. This made some of my power measurements hard as I had to choose much lower distortion levels (and as a result, reduce the reported power level). Still, there is plenty of juice visible:
View attachment 496889
View attachment 496890
View attachment 496891
View attachment 496892

For some reason, our power sweeps vs frequency were substantially better than my previous test in mono:
View attachment 496893

Finally the amplifier is stable on power up:
View attachment 496894

And only has a power off potential for noise:
View attachment 496895

Conclusions
The Nilai 500 stereo kit delivers state of the art amplifier performance with plenty of power. You can do slightly better in measured performance by giving up more power -- something I like NOT to do. With 300 or so watts power on tap into 4 ohm, you will be able to drive just about any speaker to very loud levels, reducing the anxiety over what amp to buy.

Needless to say, it is my pleasure to recommend the Hypex Nilai500 DIY Stereo Kit amplifier.
----------
As always, questions, comments, recommendations, etc. are welcome.

Any donations are much appreciated using: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/how-to-support-audio-science-review.8150/

It's truly remarkable how Bruno Putzeys consistently delivers. The man is a living legend!



And he's also a fantastic explainer of technical concepts:

 
Great amp but a bit expensive...
Will take a look at the Purifi 1et9040ba first, checkout APx555 measurements here :


The French can be proud of their Audiophonics.fr

And the 1ET6525SA module is able to deliver us also some exceptional clean Watts (even as an integrated and completely build amp):


without Preamp:

 
It's truly remarkable how Bruno Putzeys consistently delivers. The man is a living legend!



And he's also a fantastic explainer of technical concepts:


He is brilliant!
 
It's truly remarkable how Bruno Putzeys consistently delivers. The man is a living legend!



And he's also a fantastic explainer of technical concepts:

He left Hypex 11 years ago. The man is brilliant but I have some doubts on his capacity to do electronics development for companies he doesn't work for.
 
That case is from Ghent in Hong Kong. I used the same case to build my Purifi Eigentact Eval 1. When I bought it, I originally intended to use it to assemble the Hypex SMPS and a pair of their NC 400 modules to make a Stereo Hypex amp, but the Eval 1 came out at that time to exemplary reviews so I installed an Eval 1 module in it instead after having a metalworking/laser cutting fabricator make a custom back for me. My Putifi Amp has been trouble free in that case for five years. It's on around 14 hours a day and not a single hiccup, nor does it run excessively hot. I think the case's heat sink properties are OK.

It's a very nice case: It goes together very well, the parts fit together smoothly, all the screw holes are in the proper place, making it a breeze to put together. And it has plenty of room for the components. It stands in marked contrast to the Nord NC-252 build Amir reviewed last week which looked like everything was shoehorned into a tiny box. So it should be a very easy DIY with Hypex on call if trouble occurs.

As for the Nilai-500, it very closely resembles the performance of the Eigentacts and should provide years of trouble free performance. If you want an amp you can keep for a very long while which will just drive everything and not call attention to itself ever, this looks like a great choice. And the price is fair for what you're getting (internal power supply, nice case, quality modules, a single company for customer service). Great review, Amir. Thank you.
 
The French can be proud of their Audiophonics.fr

And the 1ET6525SA module is able to deliver us also some exceptional clean Watts (even as an integrated and completely build amp):


without Preamp:

Nilai was once the king of class D before 1ET6525SA came out.
 
He left Hypex 11 years ago. The man is brilliant but I have some doubts on his capacity to do electronics development for companies he doesn't work for.
I'm not sure where you are going here. Just because he left Hypex doesn't mean he is not still contributing great designs to the audio industry. Indeed, the Purifi Eigentakt class D amplifiers and Kii speakers are extremely well engineering products.
 
Last edited:
Just curious as a non-engineer normie, do these class D amps ever get as warm as class A amps that people had for decades?
Depends on how much cooling each has. My desktop CPU runs cooler than a typical phone.
 
I'm not sure where you are going here. Just because he left Hypex doesn't mean he is not still contributing great designs to the audio industry. Indeed, the Purify Eigentakt class D amplifiers and Kii speakers are extremely well engineering products.
Just replying to a person thinking that this product was designed by BP while it was not. I do not see what the problem is.
It's Purifi with a i, not a y.
 
Back
Top Bottom