Humans are not audio machines

[Deleted member 21219]

There is a subforum on this site that may help you understand quite a few things.

Audio Reference Library

Formal educational posts and articles on science and engineering of digital audio. Only site admin can create new threads. But anyone can comment.

www.audiosciencereview.com

In it there is a great deal of information on the very topics that you have mentioned.

JJ's Signal Processing and Psychoacoustics Master Library

We are privileged to have James Johnston ("JJ") as one of our members. As one of the luminaries in audio research, it has been a pleasure to read his past presentations to the local chapter of Audio Engineering Society. JJ has kindly given me permission to post links to his work per below. I...

www.audiosciencereview.com

Can You Trust Your Ears? By Tom Nousaine

I went looking for the original text of this often talked about article by Tom Nousaine but could not find it. Eventually found an optical scan with fair number of errors. I fixed most of them and thought I post it here for future reference before any trace of it disappears from the Internet...

www.audiosciencereview.com

And two entries that help explain the most commonly used test for scientific comparisons:

AES Paper Digest: Sensitivity and Reliability of ABX Blind Testing

This is abbreviated synopsis of the paper, Ten Years of ABX Testing, by David Clark: http://www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=5549 ABX testing as you may know is a double blind testing methodology aimed at determining if someone can reliably identify A from B. Both A and B are presented to the...

www.audiosciencereview.com

Statistics of ABX Testing

Statistics of ABX Testing By Amir Majidimehr ABX is by far the most talked about type of listening test on the Internet to demonstrate audible difference between two devices, or two audio files. As the name implies, the test involves two inputs, "A" and "B" and the listener is asked to vote...

www.audiosciencereview.com

If you posted on this site because you're frustrated with the difficulty of learning the truth about audio, these will help.

If, on the other hand, you just want to spew filth and insults, display ignorance and resist learning, there are other audio sites that I am sure you will find more amenable.

Jim

 

[AdamG]

Nah am going to swear like a bitch, just as will use more "moderate" language. As a successful EE I have earned the right
Not a question more an observation.
As for proof , which bit ?
Neural network function is very much known, and indeed old hat by now. The brain does work primarily as a pattern recognition system, I can not see much argument there. Yes we do process sound we receive real time, and yes we are able to derive much more from that input than a frequency spectrum.
Do I want to go and spend thousands and loads of time testing hundreds of people so I can firmly say that have proved my thesis, NOPE !!! Got high speed layout to do this weekend then its drugs sex and rock and roll

Just Trolling then. Got it! Bye bye now…. Thread closed. Yawn…..