Here is one, with not only me in our Brigand, but a couple of older ones:
That is definitely not an average car.Here is one, with not only me in our Brigand, but a couple of older ones:
That is definitely not an average car.
True!
I have had a sporty car ever since I could afford one.
I worked in the motor racing business most of my career and have had plenty of experience being driven around a circuit by F1 drivers, a trip round the old Nurburgring with Keke Rosberg and Brands Hatch with Carlos Reutemann being very memorable, so I know how far from state of the art my driving is.
Keke is a good friend, I ran his car when he was WC, and I have known Nico since he was a bump in Sina's tummy.Heh, Keke likes to drive rallycars too!
ps. How many of you knew that Keke lived in Iisalmi (home of Genelec) as a kid? Of course G came 30 years after that..
The biggest issue i notice is when that a lot of reviewers love saying ignorant things that have no objective basis, it comes off as them making up terms like BA bass or timbre. The andro, W40 and more are 6db and above bass wise i know some who will argue how there still weak to a Dynamic with any reason why beyond trust my ears.
Although I don't know what "BA bass" refers to, timbre is quantifiable (though only qualified subjectively perhaps). Psycho-acoustic phenomenon might differ in description or desirability - but that doesn't mean most of it isn't easily measureable (and certainly isn't "made up words"). The simple fact that a stereo signal is perceived to have depth and width of sound-stage is psycho-acoustics as well... but that doesn't mean phase and impulse can't be measured and described objectively. Same applies to timbre. It's just that it's nearly impossible to determine from those measurements what a particular listener will prefer or perceive with specificity.
If I misunderstood your post - then I apologize in advance. I've been up working for way too long today.
The words I detest the most in subjective reviews is "synergy" or "PRAT". Completely meaningless descriptors that vary depending on the person talking.
Slam. Air. Along with PRaT “pace, rhythm, timing”.
Sometimes you have a glass of wine and listen to a great recording and are carried away. This, of course, must be attributed to the (insert florid and vague adjectives here) properties of the most expensive, blingy, and visible, parts of the system. After all, you were looking at them when it happened.
Or the wine...
Yes, wine is an underrated component of any good system. Like tube and SS preferences, some prefer Scotch. Meditation, in fact, is a severely underrated component.
Actually, the alcohol does get into the inner ear, specifically into the endolymph of the inner ear's scala media (not shown in the diagram).There are benefits to moisturizing the cochlea with spirits to improve the listening experience.
View attachment 32204
Actually, the alcohol does get into the inner ear, specifically into the endolymph of the inner ear's scala media (not shown in the diagram).
I have lots of personal data, some of it blind.Who knew.
I'll test it out with a single-malt tomorrow.