Hi everyone,
I would like to share a project we have been developing called Home Theater Maestro (HTM).

HTM is a free acoustic room modelling and design tool intended primarily for home audio, hi-fi, home cinema and immersive audio users.
The goal is not to replace acoustic measurements or professional simulation software, but to provide an accessible way to study how room geometry, loudspeaker placement and acoustic treatment interact before making physical changes to a room.
Website: https://hometheatermaestro.fr/en/
Download: available for free for Windows, macOS, Linux and Android.
──────────────────────────
◆ What does HTM actually calculate?
The current version focuses on several relatively well-established acoustic relationships:
The philosophy is deliberately simple:
Model → predict → measure → compare → adjust.
HTM is therefore not intended to tell you that "your room will sound like this". It is intended to help identify potential acoustic problems and test different design choices before implementing them physically.
──────────────────────────
◆ Methodology note
RT60 estimation uses a hybrid Sabine/Eyring approach depending on room absorption characteristics. This is a statistical diffuse-field estimate, most valid above the Schroeder frequency; below it, the discrete modal analysis is the relevant view. HTM reports the Schroeder frequency for that reason.
Room modes are calculated using the standard rigid-wall rectangular-room modal equation, and a 3D modal map is provided. Axial, tangential and oblique modes are all computed and shown. For non-rectangular rooms (L-shapes, sloped/attic ceilings), the modal calculation uses a bounding-box approximation, which is flagged in the interface.
More advanced per-seat metrics (banded RT60, C50, C80, ITDG, STI, IACC), detailed echogram/ETC and full SBIR analysis are part of the Pro version.
I'm happy to detail the exact formulas and assumptions in this thread if people want to check the math.
──────────────────────────
◆ Why did we develop it?
A lot of acoustic software is either designed for professionals, requires significant acoustic knowledge, or focuses on a specific part of the problem.
We wanted to create something that could make some of the underlying acoustic concepts more accessible to enthusiasts without pretending that a simplified model is equivalent to a full numerical simulation.
The project is built around a small founding team with complementary backgrounds:
It has also been shaped by a group of founder beta testers (two acousticians and two software/audio enthusiasts) and a wider volunteer beta-testing team of technically minded users, who tested the software in real-world situations, identified problems, challenged assumptions and helped improve the implementation.
So although HTM is intended for the general public and is free, the underlying objective is to keep the calculations grounded in established acoustic principles rather than relying on subjective "audio" assumptions.
──────────────────────────
◆ An important limitation
I want to be very clear about this because this is an ASR audience:
HTM is not a full-wave acoustic solver, FEM/BEM simulation package, ray-tracing engine, or replacement for professional acoustic measurement.
A room is obviously much more complicated than the simplified models implemented in HTM.
The results depend on assumptions and idealisations, and real rooms contain many variables that cannot be completely represented by a simple geometrical model.
For that reason, I would actually be very interested in having technically minded people here challenge the calculations, methodology and assumptions.
If something is wrong, I would rather have it pointed out than have people blindly trust the software.
──────────────────────────
◆ Measurement integration
One aspect we particularly wanted to include is the ability to work from real measurements.
HTM can import measurement data exported from Room EQ Wizard (REW), allowing the user to compare measured room behaviour with the theoretical model.
This is important to us because the software should ultimately encourage people to measure their rooms rather than relying exclusively on prediction.
The model is a starting point; the measurement is the reality.
──────────────────────────
◆ Who is it for?
HTM is mainly aimed at:
It can also be useful educationally, because you can change room dimensions, speaker positions or treatment and immediately see how the theoretical parameters change.
──────────────────────────
◆ Why make it free?
There is no subscription for the core acoustic modelling features; they are free for everyone.
The project started primarily because we wanted to make some of the basic tools we use ourselves more accessible to enthusiasts.
There is also a paid Pro version with additional advanced/professional functions, but the core modelling workflow is available in the free version.
──────────────────────────
◆ I'd genuinely like technical feedback
I'm posting this here specifically because I know ASR has a technically demanding audience.
I am not presenting HTM as an authoritative acoustic simulation package.
Instead, I would like to invite people who have experience in acoustics, room modelling, REW, measurement or numerical methods to try it and tell us:
Constructive criticism is very welcome.
The software is available here:
Home Theater Maestro: https://hometheatermaestro.fr/en/
The application is currently free of charge for Windows, macOS, Linux and Android, and runs offline.
If there is enough interest, I can also explain the equations and assumptions used for each calculation in this thread.
Please note that we are not yet available in the US.
I would like to share a project we have been developing called Home Theater Maestro (HTM).
HTM is a free acoustic room modelling and design tool intended primarily for home audio, hi-fi, home cinema and immersive audio users.
The goal is not to replace acoustic measurements or professional simulation software, but to provide an accessible way to study how room geometry, loudspeaker placement and acoustic treatment interact before making physical changes to a room.
Website: https://hometheatermaestro.fr/en/
Download: available for free for Windows, macOS, Linux and Android.
──────────────────────────
◆ What does HTM actually calculate?
The current version focuses on several relatively well-established acoustic relationships:
- Room dimensions and geometry
- Room volume
- Room modes (3D modal map)
- Speaker/listener positioning
- First reflections and basic SBIR interactions
- Estimated reverberation time (RT60)
- Acoustic treatment modelling
- Speaker-to-listener geometry
- Import of measurement data from REW
- Comparison between theoretical predictions and measured behaviour
The philosophy is deliberately simple:
Model → predict → measure → compare → adjust.
HTM is therefore not intended to tell you that "your room will sound like this". It is intended to help identify potential acoustic problems and test different design choices before implementing them physically.
──────────────────────────
◆ Methodology note
RT60 estimation uses a hybrid Sabine/Eyring approach depending on room absorption characteristics. This is a statistical diffuse-field estimate, most valid above the Schroeder frequency; below it, the discrete modal analysis is the relevant view. HTM reports the Schroeder frequency for that reason.
Room modes are calculated using the standard rigid-wall rectangular-room modal equation, and a 3D modal map is provided. Axial, tangential and oblique modes are all computed and shown. For non-rectangular rooms (L-shapes, sloped/attic ceilings), the modal calculation uses a bounding-box approximation, which is flagged in the interface.
More advanced per-seat metrics (banded RT60, C50, C80, ITDG, STI, IACC), detailed echogram/ETC and full SBIR analysis are part of the Pro version.
I'm happy to detail the exact formulas and assumptions in this thread if people want to check the math.
──────────────────────────
◆ Why did we develop it?
A lot of acoustic software is either designed for professionals, requires significant acoustic knowledge, or focuses on a specific part of the problem.
We wanted to create something that could make some of the underlying acoustic concepts more accessible to enthusiasts without pretending that a simplified model is equivalent to a full numerical simulation.
The project is built around a small founding team with complementary backgrounds:
- a software development / research engineer, responsible for the core software development: @DTSman
- myself, working primarily in audio and immersive/Atmos mixing, contributing to the functional design and audio-related aspects.
It has also been shaped by a group of founder beta testers (two acousticians and two software/audio enthusiasts) and a wider volunteer beta-testing team of technically minded users, who tested the software in real-world situations, identified problems, challenged assumptions and helped improve the implementation.
So although HTM is intended for the general public and is free, the underlying objective is to keep the calculations grounded in established acoustic principles rather than relying on subjective "audio" assumptions.
──────────────────────────
◆ An important limitation
I want to be very clear about this because this is an ASR audience:
HTM is not a full-wave acoustic solver, FEM/BEM simulation package, ray-tracing engine, or replacement for professional acoustic measurement.
A room is obviously much more complicated than the simplified models implemented in HTM.
The results depend on assumptions and idealisations, and real rooms contain many variables that cannot be completely represented by a simple geometrical model.
For that reason, I would actually be very interested in having technically minded people here challenge the calculations, methodology and assumptions.
If something is wrong, I would rather have it pointed out than have people blindly trust the software.
──────────────────────────
◆ Measurement integration
One aspect we particularly wanted to include is the ability to work from real measurements.
HTM can import measurement data exported from Room EQ Wizard (REW), allowing the user to compare measured room behaviour with the theoretical model.
This is important to us because the software should ultimately encourage people to measure their rooms rather than relying exclusively on prediction.
The model is a starting point; the measurement is the reality.
──────────────────────────
◆ Who is it for?
HTM is mainly aimed at:
- Hi-Fi enthusiasts
- Home-cinema enthusiasts
- DIY acoustic treatment
- Studio owners
- Immersive audio users
- Anyone trying to understand why changing speaker or listening positions can affect a room
It can also be useful educationally, because you can change room dimensions, speaker positions or treatment and immediately see how the theoretical parameters change.
──────────────────────────
◆ Why make it free?
There is no subscription for the core acoustic modelling features; they are free for everyone.
The project started primarily because we wanted to make some of the basic tools we use ourselves more accessible to enthusiasts.
There is also a paid Pro version with additional advanced/professional functions, but the core modelling workflow is available in the free version.
──────────────────────────
◆ I'd genuinely like technical feedback
I'm posting this here specifically because I know ASR has a technically demanding audience.
I am not presenting HTM as an authoritative acoustic simulation package.
Instead, I would like to invite people who have experience in acoustics, room modelling, REW, measurement or numerical methods to try it and tell us:
- where the model is useful,
- where it is too simplistic,
- whether the assumptions are reasonable,
- and, most importantly, where the mathematics or implementation could be improved.
Constructive criticism is very welcome.
The software is available here:
Home Theater Maestro: https://hometheatermaestro.fr/en/
The application is currently free of charge for Windows, macOS, Linux and Android, and runs offline.
If there is enough interest, I can also explain the equations and assumptions used for each calculation in this thread.
Please note that we are not yet available in the US.
Last edited: