• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

How to wire an electret microphone properly?

staticV3

Master Contributor
Joined
Aug 29, 2019
Messages
7,540
Likes
12,011
I want to properly wire a Primo EM272 electret microphone capsule (specs) to use with battery-powered as well as mains-powered (mic->interface->PC->mains) recorders.
Which of these cable layouts would be the correct choice? And Why?

wire1.png
wire2.png
wire3.png
wire4.png

Thank you so much for your help!
 

AnalogSteph

Major Contributor
Joined
Nov 6, 2018
Messages
3,338
Likes
3,278
Location
.de
My order of preference would be either 4 > 3 > 1 > 2 or 4 > 1 > 3 > 2. #2 has poor shield coverage, and #3 may be susceptible to RF ingress at the capsule unless you connect shield to mic case. #4 has lowest shield resistance but also somewhat higher parasitic capacitance than #1, I imagine.

I can see a few potential problems here:
1. While the capsule is quite hot, you would still want to have a quiet bias supply. How do you safeguard against devices with noisy bias (more common than you might think, onboard audio for one is notorious)? Right now you don't. I would contemplate adding a battery and some active circuitry, either in the microphone body itself or as an inline box. This could enable driving substantially longer lengths of cable as well. Somewhere I had also bookmarked an article on distortion compensation for JFETs that may be applicable to electret capsules...

2. What sort of interface will take a consumer electret? It would pretty much have to be a consumer soundcard rather than the typical USB audio interfaces for home studio use with their balanced XLR mic inputs. With extra electronics, you have a chance of accomodating both.

This being an omni capsule, I am guessing it is for some sort of measurement application? Not sure how the recorder would be used in this context though.
 

Cbdb2

Major Contributor
Joined
Sep 8, 2019
Messages
1,530
Likes
1,485
Location
Vancouver
Most mic inputs, including the recorder in your pics are balanced so none of the above. Use a standard mic cable. + to +, - to -, and shield to ground.
 

DVDdoug

Major Contributor
Joined
May 27, 2021
Messages
2,920
Likes
3,834
to use with battery-powered as well as mains-powered (mic->interface->PC->mains) recorders.
Most stand-alone recorders have a "pro" balanced XLR connection (with optional 48V phantom power) and they are not directly-compatible with "computer mics" or an electret element. Computers have a 5V "bias power" for an electret.

"Real" condenser mics work from 48V phantom power. (Dynamic mics don't require power.)

There are some 48V phantom-powered mics made with an electret element and I assume they have an op-amp (or two) inside to get the balanced output. And, there may be a few battery-powered mics with balanced outputs. (Those were popular in the past when most mixers & PA systems didn't have phantom power but they are rare now.)

There are some "cheap" electret-based XLR mics that look like studio mics and I'd guess they don't actually have balanced outputs. Sometimes they claim they'll work with a computer or with phantom power but the specs are vague and I don't trust 'em.
 
OP
staticV3

staticV3

Master Contributor
Joined
Aug 29, 2019
Messages
7,540
Likes
12,011
My order of preference would be either 4 > 3 > 1 > 2 or 4 > 1 > 3 > 2. #2 has poor shield coverage, and #3 may be susceptible to RF ingress at the capsule unless you connect shield to mic case. #4 has lowest shield resistance but also somewhat higher parasitic capacitance than #1, I imagine.

I can see a few potential problems here:
1. While the capsule is quite hot, you would still want to have a quiet bias supply. How do you safeguard against devices with noisy bias (more common than you might think, onboard audio for one is notorious)? Right now you don't. I would contemplate adding a battery and some active circuitry, either in the microphone body itself or as an inline box. This could enable driving substantially longer lengths of cable as well. Somewhere I had also bookmarked an article on distortion compensation for JFETs that may be applicable to electret capsules...

2. What sort of interface will take a consumer electret? It would pretty much have to be a consumer soundcard rather than the typical USB audio interfaces for home studio use with their balanced XLR mic inputs. With extra electronics, you have a chance of accomodating both.

This being an omni capsule, I am guessing it is for some sort of measurement application? Not sure how the recorder would be used in this context though.
Thank you for your preference list and other tips.
Since I've got everything else figured out, I wanted this thread to focus soley on what the best wire configuration would be to connect an electret to a 3.5mm mono plug. To that end, your list was already a big help!
 
OP
staticV3

staticV3

Master Contributor
Joined
Aug 29, 2019
Messages
7,540
Likes
12,011
Most mic inputs, including the recorder in your pics are balanced so none of the above. Use a standard mic cable. + to +, - to -, and shield to ground.
The recorder in my pics is a PCM-D100, which uses a 3.5mm TRS Stereo single-ended microphone input.
 
OP
staticV3

staticV3

Master Contributor
Joined
Aug 29, 2019
Messages
7,540
Likes
12,011
Most stand-alone recorders have a "pro" balanced XLR connection (with optional 48V phantom power) and they are not directly-compatible with "computer mics" or an electret element. Computers have a 5V "bias power" for an electret.

"Real" condenser mics work from 48V phantom power. (Dynamic mics don't require power.)

There are some 48V phantom-powered mics made with an electret element and I assume they have an op-amp (or two) inside to get the balanced output. And, there may be a few battery-powered mics with balanced outputs. (Those were popular in the past when most mixers & PA systems didn't have phantom power but they are rare now.)

There are some "cheap" electret-based XLR mics that look like studio mics and I'd guess they don't actually have balanced outputs. Sometimes they claim they'll work with a computer or with phantom power but the specs are vague and I don't trust 'em.
Thank you for your comments, fortunately I know all this already.
The aim of this thread was to figure out the optimal wire configuration between an electret and a 3.5mm TS plug. Nothing else. Perhaps I should've been clearer about that.
 

EHC

Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2021
Messages
12
Likes
4
Location
Bucharest, Romania
Method 3 is the best, and if you can extend the shield around the capsule without touch it is even better. The parasitic induced currents will flow mostly through the shield.
Method 2 is the worst, almost like connecting the capsule without shielded cable.
Method 4 will give you similar results as 1, but is a shame to not proper use the cable if it has two inner conductors.
You can get away with method 1 if you will use the microphone outdoor and the cable is relatively short, like 1..3 meters. But if the medium is heavy parasitic and/or the cable is longer, use the third method!
 
OP
staticV3

staticV3

Master Contributor
Joined
Aug 29, 2019
Messages
7,540
Likes
12,011
Method 3 is the best, and if you can extend the shield around the capsule without touch it is even better. The parasitic induced currents will flow mostly through the shield.
Method 2 is the worst, almost like connecting the capsule without shielded cable.
Method 4 will give you similar results as 1, but is a shame to not proper use the cable if it has two inner conductors.
You can get away with method 1 if you will use the microphone outdoor and the cable is relatively short, like 1..3 meters. But if the medium is heavy parasitic and/or the cable is longer, use the third method!
Thank you very much for your insight!
I think I'm confident enough to start making a bunch of cables with configuration 3 now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EHC
Top Bottom