I’ve always admired this case!Just get this semi-passive heatsink case for the RPi 4, seems highly recommended.
https://www.amazon.com/Argon-Raspberry-Aluminum-Heatsink-Supports/dp/B07WP8WC3V
I have one. It is a very good case, and also looks good !I’ve always admired this case!
The Sabaj has HDMI input. Will connecting a chrome cast work?
RPI3 has a bottleneck In the input/output. It won’t run Ethernet and usb simultaneously without the occasional click or pop since just one chip is used for both. Prior to RPI4 people used something like the Allo USBBridge sitting on the HAT pins. Expensive but fixed the problem. RPI4 has a more powerful (and power hungry cpu) which we don’t need for streaming but also includes separate 1G Ethernet and usb3 chips. So no bottleneck and no interruptions to the audio. Some pundits say the stray electrical interference on the PI4 is marginally worse than on the PI3. As usual little or no measurements to back the claim. My experience: I’m using a PI4 with a relatively expensive Topping D90 with stock USB cable. Absolutely no USB noise detectable on the start of an exceptionally quiet passage of a 24/96 recording, even with my ear next to the loudspeaker at max volume.RPi3 or RPi4
Which one is better and why?
10x. I have a couple of them, mostly RPi4 but also RPi2 and RPi3A.Wow! Impressive
I forgot to add that if you’re using a HAT DAC (HiFi Berry or Allo for example) then the RPI3 is perfectly OK since there is no use of the usb connectors. Plus the RPI3 does not get so hot. Again some pundits recommend the use of the quiet IFI power supply here. I can’t comment as I have not tried a HAT dac.RPi3 or RPi4
Which one is better and why?
Will this myth never die? Right symptom, wrong cause, and it's not unavoidable. There's a long bug thread about the details in the raspbeery pi kernel github. Having said that I'd go for the Pi 4 anyway as it's better in so many areas - the only thing it's got against it is a little extra heat.RPI3 has a bottleneck In the input/output. It won’t run Ethernet and usb simultaneously without the occasional click or pop since just one chip is used for both.
I didn’t know that. Thanks for putting the record straight. So is the following statement accurate? For someone wanting to stream audio from the Ethernet to usb on the RPI using a standard software unmodified (piCorePlayer, Volumio, Moode etc), then the only way is to use a RPI4.Will this myth never die? Right symptom, wrong cause, and it's not unavoidable. There's a long bug thread about the details in the raspbeery pi kernel github. Having said that I'd go for the Pi 4 anyway as it's better in so many areas - the only thing it's got against it is a little extra heat.
Great choice of DAC! I use a heatsink case FLIRC. This link is to a UK supplier but I expect you can get these locally in France if not from AmazonThank you EdW and somebodyelse .
Like you - using the D90.
I'm hard wired using RJ45 as input and I would rather use the Pi's USB output.
So that you both recommend the Pi 4 ?
I was concerned about the 60+°C heat - but true that there are aluminium housings ... Argon ONE - though the housing is not my taste (looks a bit alien type to me) all connectors in the back seem a big advantage ...
One last question: would it be possible to stream with the Internet's provider ADSL box ?
It has RJ45, Toslink, USB, Coax (maybe) ....
I haven’t heard the Gustard A22 let alone in a true blind test against the Topping D90. I very much doubt if I could distinguish any differences between any of Amir’s top ranking DACs. For sure I don’t have golden ears. and the rest of my system would probably mask most differences anyway!Thank you, there other aluminium heat sinks types on Amazon at half the price ...
I'm not 100% sure about the D90 yet.
I had the A22 before and subjectively, I was more enchanted - I still think that it's analogue output stage is better ... but Topping's company seems more reliable and more communicative.
I don't think I've never had pops/clicks with piCorePlayer on the earlier Pi versions using wired or wireless ethernet and a USB DAC. I tried high sample rate flacs from the 2l.no samples, and a Focusrite Forte that takes 4 channels of 32 bit samples to try to provoke it on a 3 B v1.2 and it was fine. That doesn't mean it's definitely fine with all DACs - the bug thread has reports that some are more likely to have problems than others - but in my experience piCorePlayer is fine on any Pi.I didn’t know that. Thanks for putting the record straight. So is the following statement accurate? For someone wanting to stream audio from the Ethernet to usb on the RPI using a standard software unmodified (piCorePlayer, Volumio, Moode etc), then the only way is to use a RPI4.
So that you both recommend the Pi 4 ?
I was concerned about the 60+°C heat - but true that there are aluminium housings ... Argon ONE - though the housing is not my taste (looks a bit alien type to me) all connectors in the back seem a big advantage ...
Without knowing the details of the ADSL box it's impossible to say. The hardware may well be capable, but the stock firmware probably doesn't include the necessary software.One last question: would it be possible to stream with the Internet's provider ADSL box ?
It has RJ45, Toslink, USB, Coax (maybe) ....