Soria Moria
Addicted to Fun and Learning
Soria Moria slott was written down first in 1843.That would be older than Soria Moria slott in writing. Not bad. (I'm guessing not really.)
Soria Moria slott was written down first in 1843.That would be older than Soria Moria slott in writing. Not bad. (I'm guessing not really.)
It always looks bright in your twenties, that's the trick. And it always is. It all changes slowly but when another twenty years passes the world looks much more to your liking as you're not alone with those new ideas. (Yeah, I guess I have so called positive attitude but this is my experience during this single run we all get.)I don't think you're describing kids anymore, but rather Millennials who are now in their 30s and 40s. For those of us who in their 20s, it's hard to say what the future holds but to me it looks brighter than what those Millennials are dealing with.
Whups, I really don't know what I was thinking about.Soria Moria slott was written down first in 1843.
It is. The last subjectivist forum I ran was dominated by the older bracket.I wonder if the distribution might be different on a subjectivist forum.
Kids are interested,they just don't have the money and space (yet).I guarantee you the average age on ASR is not 46 or 47. Everyone lies about their age!
It's very likely the majority of audiophiles will die off in the next 10 years.
Kids are not interested in big speakers, SINAD or any of that. They are totally happy with earbuds and boom boxes. Even standard TV speakers are fine for most of them. They are having trouble affording a place to live and Audio is far down the list of wants.
The alignment with x-axis seems weird. As if bin width was not 1 year.How about a histogram?
I'm a regular ASR reader and am 77 years old, dag nabbit.
And yet I imagined it wouldn't be.It is. The last subjectivist forum I ran was dominated by the older bracket.
I went to get Google stats but the largest category is "unknown:"
View attachment 385177
That category is larger than the sum of the rest!
Ok, here's a new and improved histogram with the widths fixed:The alignment with x-axis seems weird. As if bin width was not 1 year.
View attachment 385182
In a way, that's good, at least demonstrates somewhat its not just us dinosaursDamn !! At almost seventy, I’m on the backside of the curve
1. ASR users are overwhelmingly in their 40s, with a sharp rise starting around 24 (college grads?), and a smooth slope downward starting at 50So what did you conclude from this?
I'm thinking its more than 40s as a guess, but would be glad to see a younger population of participants, just don't generally expect that.1. ASR users are overwhelmingly in their 40s, with a sharp rise starting around 24 (college grads?), and a smooth slope downward starting at 50
2. Many more members provide their age than those who don't, with 51666/77082 = 67% providing it
3. Many users appear to be fibbing with substantially more members born on an "even" decade than any other years
lots of people put something like jan 1 2001 just because it's easy and they don't want to give their actual age
Why was I not informed of this? (See previous post.)
LOL reminds me when asked for the stupid voluntary birthdate for the computer entry I just use 1/1/(my year, well into my 60s). Today a cashier bless her heart said I wasn't so young (altho I use my birth year I use 1/1 to preface just to make it easier, but am 68).Just remember to take this data with a grain of salt because there are many, many profiles on here with, well, inaccurate birthdates (eg, lots of people put something like jan 1 2001 just because it's easy and they don't want to give their actual age).